BACKGROUND: An understanding of prognosis following burns is important. It alleviates patient and familial stress, provides a framework for better resource use, and facilitates benchmarking of performance between specialist centers. METHODS: Data were collected from eight tertiary referral burns centers in Australia and New Zealand. Our aim was to identify factors independently associated with mortality to develop a mortality prediction model, which accurately quantifies the risk of death among adults with burns who require intensive care. RESULTS: Between January 2005 and December 2011, 1,715 patients were admitted to intensive care unit with acute thermal burns. The mean (SD) age was 41.1 (18.0) years, and 20.3% (n = 348) were female. Median percentage of total body surface area was 17% (6-35%) and percent full-thickness surface area was 4% (0-20%). Inhalational injury was documented as present in 36.2%. Accidental injury was the most common etiology of burn (70.4%) and most frequently via a flame (68.3%). Overall hospital mortality was 10.9% (n = 187). Independent risk factors for death were age (odds ratio [OR], 1.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.06-1.10; p < 0.001), percentage of full-thickness surface area (OR, 1.07; 95% CI 1.06-1.08; p < 0.001), and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score excluding age (OR, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.07-1.15; p < 0.001) and female sex (OR, 3.35; 95% CI, 1.84-6.11; p = 0.001). There was no association between inhalational injury or deliberate self-harm and death, as well as etiology or type of burn. CONCLUSION: A highly discriminatory mortality prediction model was developed using logistic regression. Risk of death following major burns can be predicted from a combination of physiologic and burns specific parameters. Female sex is a highly significant risk factor.
BACKGROUND: An understanding of prognosis following burns is important. It alleviates patient and familial stress, provides a framework for better resource use, and facilitates benchmarking of performance between specialist centers. METHODS: Data were collected from eight tertiary referral burns centers in Australia and New Zealand. Our aim was to identify factors independently associated with mortality to develop a mortality prediction model, which accurately quantifies the risk of death among adults with burns who require intensive care. RESULTS: Between January 2005 and December 2011, 1,715 patients were admitted to intensive care unit with acute thermal burns. The mean (SD) age was 41.1 (18.0) years, and 20.3% (n = 348) were female. Median percentage of total body surface area was 17% (6-35%) and percent full-thickness surface area was 4% (0-20%). Inhalational injury was documented as present in 36.2%. Accidental injury was the most common etiology of burn (70.4%) and most frequently via a flame (68.3%). Overall hospital mortality was 10.9% (n = 187). Independent risk factors for death were age (odds ratio [OR], 1.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.06-1.10; p < 0.001), percentage of full-thickness surface area (OR, 1.07; 95% CI 1.06-1.08; p < 0.001), and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score excluding age (OR, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.07-1.15; p < 0.001) and female sex (OR, 3.35; 95% CI, 1.84-6.11; p = 0.001). There was no association between inhalational injury or deliberate self-harm and death, as well as etiology or type of burn. CONCLUSION: A highly discriminatory mortality prediction model was developed using logistic regression. Risk of death following major burns can be predicted from a combination of physiologic and burns specific parameters. Female sex is a highly significant risk factor.
Authors: Wojciech Witkowski; Marek Kawecki; Agnieszka Surowiecka-Pastewka; Wojciech Klimm; Katarzyna Szamotulska; Stanisław Niemczyk Journal: Med Sci Monit Date: 2016-10-17
Authors: Inge Spronk; Nancy E E Van Loey; Charlie Sewalt; Daan Nieboer; Babette Renneberg; Asgjerd Litleré Moi; Caisa Oster; Lotti Orwelius; Margriet E van Baar; Suzanne Polinder Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-01-10 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Kajal Mehta; Hana Arega; Natalie L Smith; Kathleen Li; Emma Gause; Joohee Lee; Barclay Stewart Journal: Am J Surg Date: 2021-07-24 Impact factor: 2.565
Authors: Inge Spronk; Catherine M Legemate; Jan Dokter; Nancy E E van Loey; Margriet E van Baar; Suzanne Polinder Journal: Crit Care Date: 2018-06-14 Impact factor: 9.097