Literature DB >> 23887337

A comparison of demographic and psychosexual characteristics of women with primary versus secondary provoked vestibulodynia.

Lori A Brotto1, Leslie A Sadownik, Sydney Thomson, Marcy Dayan, Kelly B Smith, Brooke N Seal, Melissa Moses, Areiyu Zhang.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Provoked vestibulodynia (PVD) is a distressing genital pain condition affecting approximately 12% of premenopausal women. It has been speculated that primary (ie, lifelong) and secondary (ie, acquired) PVD may represent 2 distinct conditions with different etiologies. There is also evidence that primary and secondary PVD subtypes may respond differently to conventional treatments. The goal of this study was to compare the demographic, clinical, and psychosexual characteristics of a large sample of premenopausal women with primary and secondary PVD.
METHODS: A total of 132 premenopausal women (n=42 primary; n=90 secondary) with PVD who sought treatment in a Multidisciplinary Vulvodynia Program completed demographic questions and a battery of validated self-report measures before treatment.
RESULTS: Women with primary PVD had a longer duration of PVD as well as more time before diagnosis. Women with secondary PVD reported significantly more clitoral hood pain, higher overall vestibular pain levels, more overall sexual dysfunction and sex-related distress, and proportionately more intercourse occasions that were painful. Women with primary pain stated they had significantly more dysmenorrhea and were more likely to report that their partners were unaware of their PVD symptoms. There were no significant subtype differences on any psychological measure but a trend towards higher magnification of symptoms in women with secondary PVD. DISCUSSION: Overall the findings suggest some important differences in the characteristics of women with primary versus secondary PVD which may have management-related implications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 23887337     DOI: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e31829ea118

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin J Pain        ISSN: 0749-8047            Impact factor:   3.442


  7 in total

1.  Differences in pain subtypes between Hispanic and non-Hispanic white women with chronic vulvar pain.

Authors:  Ruby H N Nguyen; Robyn L Reese; Bernard L Harlow
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 2.681

2.  Patterns in Vulvodynia Treatments and 6-Month Outcomes for Women Enrolled in the National Vulvodynia Registry-An Exploratory Prospective Study.

Authors:  Georgine Lamvu; Meryl Alappattu; Kathryn Witzeman; Mark Bishop; Michael Robinson; Andrea Rapkin
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2018-04-07       Impact factor: 3.802

3.  Menstrual Cycle Characteristics and Vulvodynia.

Authors:  Vanessa Estibeiro; Allison Juntunen; Julia C Bond; Bernard L Harlow
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 3.017

4.  Vulvodynia is not created equally: empirical classification of women with vulvodynia.

Authors:  Meryl Alappattu; Georgine Lamvu; Jessica Feranec; Kathryn Witzeman; Michael Robinson; Andrea Rapkin
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2017-07-06       Impact factor: 3.133

5.  How Does Myofascial Physical Therapy Attenuate Pain in Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome?

Authors:  Keren Grinberg; Irit Weissman-Fogel; Lior Lowenstein; Liora Abramov; Michal Granot
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 3.037

Review 6.  Vulvodynia-It Is Time to Accept a New Understanding from a Neurobiological Perspective.

Authors:  Rafael Torres-Cueco; Francisco Nohales-Alfonso
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 7.  Similarities between interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome and vulvodynia: implications for patient management.

Authors:  Jennifer Yonaitis Fariello; Robert M Moldwin
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2015-12
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.