Literature DB >> 23887144

Blood pressure relation to body composition and age: analysis of a nurse-led investigation and consultation program.

Mária Boledovičová1, Jan Hendl, Lubica Lišková, Alica Slamková, Martin Matoulek, Zuzana Stránská, Štěpán Svačina, Miloš Velemínský.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Blood pressure (BP) increases with age and obesity. We have assessed the relative contribution of age and fatness to BP regulation in a healthy population investigated by nurse practitioners.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Preventive investigation and counseling was offered at the entrance hall of the regional authority´s office in the town of Nitra by 2 nursing specialists who investigated 120 men and 276 women. In men the mean body mass index (BMI) was 26.8 kg/m2, mean weight was 84.4 kg, mean fat percentage was 23.3, mean age was 46.1 years, mean systolic BP was 133.1 mmHg, and mean diastolic BP was 82.5 mmHg. In women the mean BMI was 24.8 kg/m2, mean weight was 67.3 kg, mean fat percentage was 29.4, mean age was 45.4 years, mean systolic BP was 127.7 mmHg, and mean diastolic BP was 78.5 mmHg. Correlation analysis was performed and in multiple regression analysis we used BP values as the dependent variable and fat percentage and age as independent variables. Normality of variables distribution was checked and found satisfactorily.
RESULTS: Most of the subjects had an untreated component of metabolic syndrome. There was a correlation between BP values, age, and percent body fat. BP was regulated only to a certain degree by fatness and age, with the influence being relatively small. Our results showed that BP was more influenced by fatness than age, and body fatness was more related to higher systolic than to diastolic BP.
CONCLUSIONS: Age and fatness could explain BP values by only 3-30%, although BP was more influenced by fatness than by age. Nurse practitioners can effectively detect and motivate people with metabolic syndrome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23887144      PMCID: PMC3728227          DOI: 10.12659/msm.883984

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Monit        ISSN: 1234-1010


Background

Evaluating the presence of metabolic syndrome components in a healthy population is not easy because it is difficult to find a reasonably defined healthy population. Nurse specialists can design and perform such studies. Essential hypertension is an important disease with a great impact on the mortality and morbidity of all populations. The precise pathogenesis of this common type of hypertension is still unresolved. The role of genetic factors is very likely, but the most important causality is its relation to metabolic syndrome including obesity [1]. It is known that blood pressure typically increases with age and obesity [2,3]. In the present study, we have, therefore, assessed in more detail the relative contribution of age and fatness to blood pressure regulation in a healthy population.

Material and Methods

We have investigated a sample of 120 men and 276 women in a relatively non-selected population. The subjects visited the office of the regional authority in the town of Nitra, Slovakia, for non-medical reasons. At the entrance hall nursing specialists offered them a basic preventive exam that included a blood pressure measurement, measurement of percentage of body fat content, and weight and height measurements. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated. Percentage of body fat was measured bimanually using an OMRON 306 device. Blood pressure was measured 3 times during 90 seconds using a classical mercury sphygmomanometer and the mean value was calculated. Subjects who were treated for hypertension, cardiovascular or other severe disease including diabetes were not included in the final calculation. Since the aim of the study was to investigate the presence of obesity and hypertension in younger and older adults and the role of age and fatness on blood pressure regulation, we have grouped subjects into two main categories: below and above the age of 40. The NCSS 2007 program [4] was used for statistical calculations. Mean values of BMI, weight, height, fat percentage, age, and systolic and diastolic blood pressure were calculated. Pearson’s correlation coefficients were calculated in both samples after confirmation of normality. According to the interdependence of anthropometric variables, we have used only fat percentage and age in the regression analysis. The protocol of this study was approved by the ethics committee of Nitra Faculty Hospital and all participants signed an informed consent.

Results

Means and standard deviations of variables are shown in Table 1. Mean value of BMI in men was found to be in the lower range of overweight and in women in upper range of normal. The percentage of fat was slightly above normal in men and in the upper range of normal in women – normal 20% and 30%, respectively, according to Jaffrin [5]. Mean age was comparable in men and women (approximately 45 years). Mean blood pressure was in the normal range in women and in the upper normal range in men [6].
Table 1

Basic sample characteristics – men.

VariableCountMeanStandard deviation
BMI12026.83.9
Weight [kg]12084.413.2
Fat percentage12023.37.0
Age [years]12046.116.6
Height [cm]120176.97.6
BPs [mmHg]120133.117.0
BPd [mmHg]12082.511.6

BMI – Body Mass Index [kg/m2]; Fat percentage – percentage of total body fat [%]; BPs – systolic blood pressure; BPd – diastolic blood pressure.

Correlation analysis is shown in Table 2. In both men and women, significant correlation of systolic and diastolic blood pressure was found with weight, BMI, fat percentage, and age. No significant correlation of blood pressure to height was found. In both men and women a negative correlation of height and age was present as a typical secular trend, as was a negative correlation of fat percentage with height.
Table 2

Basic sample characteristics – women.

VariableCountMeanStandard deviation
BMI27624.84.6
Weight [kg]27667.312.8
Fat percentage27629.48.3
Age [years]27645.415.4
Height [cm]276164.76.1
BPs [mmHg]276127.717.5
BPd [mmHg]27678.510.6

BMI – Body Mass Index [kg/m2]; Fat percentage – percentage of total body fat [%]; BPs – systolic blood pressure; BPd – diastolic blood pressure.

In multiple regression analysis we used blood pressure values as the dependent variable and fat percentage and age as independent variables. The following models were obtained: Women: Blood pressure systolic = 100.13 + 0.332 × fat percentage + 0.365 × age Blood pressure diastolic = 65.56 + 0.214 × fat percentage + 0.141 × age Men: Blood pressure systolic = 112.15 + 0.89 × fat percentage − 0.003 × age Blood pressure diastolic = 73.87 + 0.27 × fat percentage + 0.045 × age 40 years of age and less: Women: Blood pressure systolic = 99.55 + 0.417 × fat percentage + 0.352 × age Blood pressure diastolic= 61.93 + 0.205 × fat percentage + 0.267 × age Men: Blood pressure systolic = 103.72 + 0.994 × fat percentage + 0.295 × age Blood pressure diastolic = 69.28 + 0.313 × fat percentage + 0.207 × age Above 40 years of age: Women: Blood pressure systolic = 89.92 + 0.333 × fat percentage + 0.549 × age Blood pressure diastolic = 71.35 + 0.204 × fat percentage + 0.045 × age Men: Blood pressure systolic = 101.24 + 0.952 × fat percentage + 0.148 × age Blood pressure diastolic = 72.53 + 0.294 × fat percentage + 0.056 × age Validity of the calculated models (Tables 3 and 4) is low for diastolic pressure, especially in the age 40 and over group (Table 5) (R2 below 10% is low by convention according to Cohen 2002 and Hendl 2009 [7]).
Table 3

Correlation Report 276 women (Pearson Correlations and significance levels p).

AgeWeightHeightFatPercentageBPsBPdBMI
Age1.000.36−0.230.630.460.330.44
p0.000.000.000.000.000.000.00
Weight0.361.000.200.730.370.360.91
p0.000.000.000.000.000.000.00
Height−0.230.201.00−0.25−0.000.02−0.16
p0.000.000.000.000.930.620.00
Fat percentage0.630.73−0.251.000.390.320.81
p0.000.000.000.000.000.000.00
BPs0.460.37−0.000.391.000.700.37
p0.000.000.930.000.000.000.00
BPd0.330.360.020.320.701.000.35
p0.000.000.620.000.000.000.00
BMI0.440.91−0.160.810.370.351.00
p0.000.000.000.000.000.000.00

BMI – Body Mass Index [kg/m2]; Fat percentage – percentage of total body fat [%]; BPs – systolic blood pressure; BPd – diastolic blood pressure; p – p-value. Age was calculated in years. Weight was calculated in kg. Height was calculated in cm.

Table 4

Correlation Report 120 men (Pearson Correlations and significance levels p).

AgeWeightHeightFatPercentageBPsBPdBMI
Age1.00−0.09−0.280.380.160.160.64
p0.000.310.000.000.070.060.48
Weight−0.091.000.380.500.370.300.81
p0.310.000.000.000.000.000.00
Height−0.280.381.00−0.280.030.13−0.20
p0.000.000.000.000.670.150.02
Fat percentage0.380.50−0.281.000.380.220.69
p0.000.000.000.000.000.010.00
BPs0.160.370.030.381.000.700.37
p0.070.000.670.000.000.000.00
BPd0.160.300.130.220.701.000.23
p0.060.000.150.010.000.000.00
BMI0.060.81−0.200.690.370.231.00
p0.480.000.020.000.000.000.00

BMI – Body Mass Index [kg/m2]; Fat percentage – percentage of total body fat [%]; BPs – systolic blood pressure; BPd – diastolic blood pressure; p – p-value. Age was calculated in years. Weight was calculated in kg. Height was calculated in cm.

Table 5

Validity of models R2% a significance p of regression coefficients.

WomenMen
BPsystBPdiastBPsystBPdiast
All<4040≤All<4040≤All<4040≤All<4040≤
R2%26.114.715.313.39.52.918.329.614.66.710.83.7
%F0.000.030.040.010.190.060.000.000.000.030.060.13
Age0.000.030.000.000.040.590.960.270.410.400.240.64

R2% – coefficient of determination; BPsyst – systolic blood pressure; BPdiast – diastolic blood pressure; <40 – age less than 40 years; 40≤ – age of 40 years or more; %F – fat percentage (%). Age was calculated in years. Blood pressure was calculated in mm Hg.

Discussion

It is very difficult to find a well-defined healthy population. Using blood donors, volunteers, or sports participants does not include a sample typical for all aspects of healthy populations. Nurse practitioners usually offer preventive and educational health services in schools, sport matches, and social and cultural events. Our sample formed by visitors of the regional authority (excluding persons already treated for hypertension or other serious diseases) is perhaps a very typical sample of healthy people of all ages. Hypertension is a disease with increasing prevalence in obese and older people [8-10]. However, results of our study based on a large population of healthy subjects only partially confirmed such previous findings. First, we showed that there was a correlation between blood pressure values and age and fatness. Specifically, we showed that blood pressure was regulated only to a certain degree by fatness and age, with the influence being relatively small (R2 from 2.9% to 29.6% in regression models). Thus, increased age and fatness could explain higher blood pressure values by only 3–30%. Furthermore, our results show that blood pressure was more influenced by fatness than age, and body fatness was more related to higher systolic than to diastolic BP values. However, we found a negative correlation between height and fatness, with shorter subjects more frequently obese than those who were taller. One explanation could be that the large overnutrition that is present in most populations these days is more harmful for those who are short. Elkhalifa [11] found in a similar sample of a healthy population that hypertension is influenced by 3 factors: diabetes, age, and obesity. The influence of socioeconomic factors and stress on hypertension could be important in an adult population [12]. Blood pressure can be influenced from 65% to 75% [13] by various factors related closely to the degree of fatness (e.g., high sympathetic tonus; sodium retention; hormonal levels like renin, angiotensinogen, angiotensin II, aldosteron and leptin; subclinical inflammation; and insulin resistance [14]. Furthermore, low levels of adipose tissue hormones could also play an important role, as demonstrated previously [15]. Low levels of adiponectin [16] and ghrelin are linked to obesity [17]. It is very well known that arterial hypertension is more common in people with type 2 diabetes, especially the isolated systolic hypertension. In people with diabetes, higher blood pressure is more common in women, and in diabetic women there is a higher correlation between age and blood pressure [18]; therefore, we excluded diabetic populations. In postmenopausal women, blood pressure is more dependent on the duration of menopause than on age [19]. We have not registered data about menopause in our sample, but some differences in the 2 groups of women below 40 years and over 40 years could be explained by menopause. Many sociological factors could influence the prevalence of hypertension, like low education and alcoholism [20]. The importance of these factors is decreasing [21]. As for epidemiological and biological factors, the presence of metabolic syndrome components is very predictive for hypertension [22]. One biological factor that is very important is low birth weight; the influence of low birth weight on hypertension increases with age [23]. Blood pressure variability is also very predictive for later hypertension [24]. Another very important factor for hypertension is arterial stiffness [2]. The risk of hypertension in obese people is 2 times higher than in non-obese people [25]. Etiologically, cross-talk between vessels and adipose tissue could be very important [26].

Conclusions

The present study suggests that percent body fat is a better predictor of blood pressure regulation than is age. Nevertheless, age is a relatively good predictor of systolic and diastolic blood pressure, more so in women than in men. Nurse practitioners can effectively detect and motivate persons with components of metabolic syndrome. This strategy is very important because the majority of the supposed healthy population had an untreated component of metabolic syndrome (overweight, obesity, and hypertension).
  24 in total

Review 1.  Adiponectin, cardiovascular function, and hypertension.

Authors:  Zhao V Wang; Philipp E Scherer
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2007-11-12       Impact factor: 10.190

2.  Effect of age at menopause on blood pressure in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Yoichi Izumi; Koichi Matsumoto; Yukio Ozawa; Yuji Kasamaki; Atsusi Shinndo; Masakatsu Ohta; Madet Jumabay; Tomohiro Nakayama; Eise Yokoyama; Hiroaki Shimabukuro; Hiroshi Kawamura; Zuheng Cheng; Yitong Ma; Masum Mahmut
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.689

3.  Race and sex differentials in the impact of hypertension in the United States. The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey I Epidemiologic Follow-up Study.

Authors:  J Cornoni-Huntley; A Z LaCroix; R J Havlik
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1989-04

Review 4.  Insulin resistance: a chicken that has come to roost.

Authors:  G M Reaven
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1999-11-18       Impact factor: 5.691

Review 5.  Blood pressure and ageing.

Authors:  Elisabete Pinto
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.401

Review 6.  [Arterial hypertension in an ambulatory population of elderly subjects. Epidemiologic and clinical study in Isonzo].

Authors:  L R Tamburrini; E Ponte; M Benedetti; R Burri; A Carbonari
Journal:  Minerva Med       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 4.806

Review 7.  Epidemiology of hypertension in the elderly.

Authors:  Robert H Fagard
Journal:  Am J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2002 Jan-Feb

8.  Molecular mechanisms of ghrelin-mediated endothelial nitric oxide synthase activation.

Authors:  Xiangbin Xu; Bong Sook Jhun; Chang Hoon Ha; Zheng-Gen Jin
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2008-05-01       Impact factor: 4.736

Review 9.  Factors that influence the risk of hypertension in obese individuals.

Authors:  Gwenn Coatmellec-Taglioni; Catherine Ribière
Journal:  Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.894

10.  2007 Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: The Task Force for the Management of Arterial Hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC).

Authors:  Giuseppe Mancia; Guy De Backer; Anna Dominiczak; Renata Cifkova; Robert Fagard; Giuseppe Germano; Guido Grassi; Anthony M Heagerty; Sverre E Kjeldsen; Stephane Laurent; Krzysztof Narkiewicz; Luis Ruilope; Andrzej Rynkiewicz; Roland E Schmieder; Harry A J Struijker Boudier; Alberto Zanchetti; Alec Vahanian; John Camm; Raffaele De Caterina; Veronica Dean; Kenneth Dickstein; Gerasimos Filippatos; Christian Funck-Brentano; Irene Hellemans; Steen Dalby Kristensen; Keith McGregor; Udo Sechtem; Sigmund Silber; Michal Tendera; Petr Widimsky; Jose Luis Zamorano; Sverre E Kjeldsen; Serap Erdine; Krzysztof Narkiewicz; Wolfgang Kiowski; Enrico Agabiti-Rosei; Ettore Ambrosioni; Renata Cifkova; Anna Dominiczak; Robert Fagard; Anthony M Heagerty; Stephane Laurent; Lars H Lindholm; Giuseppe Mancia; Athanasios Manolis; Peter M Nilsson; Josep Redon; Roland E Schmieder; Harry A J Struijker-Boudier; Margus Viigimaa; Gerasimos Filippatos; Stamatis Adamopoulos; Enrico Agabiti-Rosei; Ettore Ambrosioni; Vicente Bertomeu; Denis Clement; Serap Erdine; Csaba Farsang; Dan Gaita; Wolfgang Kiowski; Gregory Lip; Jean-Michel Mallion; Athanasios J Manolis; Peter M Nilsson; Eoin O'Brien; Piotr Ponikowski; Josep Redon; Frank Ruschitzka; Juan Tamargo; Pieter van Zwieten; Margus Viigimaa; Bernard Waeber; Bryan Williams; Jose Luis Zamorano
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2007-06-11       Impact factor: 29.983

View more
  3 in total

1.  Evaluation of the Trail Making Test and interval timing as measures of cognition in healthy adults: comparisons by age, education, and gender.

Authors:  Włodzimierz Płotek; Wojciech Łyskawa; Anna Kluzik; Małgorzata Grześkowiak; Roland Podlewski; Zbigniew Żaba; Leon Drobnik
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2014-02-03

2.  Clinical profiles and outcomes of acute aortic dissection in a predominantly Hispanic population.

Authors:  Haider Alkhateeb; Sarmad Said; Chad J Cooper; Carlos Rodriguez-Castro; Alok Dwivedi; Eduardo Onate; Raphael Quansah; Debabrata Mukherjee
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2014-05-07

3.  Is a targeted and planned GP intervention effective in cardiovascular disease prevention? A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Ksenija Kranjčević; Biserka Bergman Marković; Dragica Ivezić Lalić; Davorka Vrdoljak; Jasna Vučak
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2014-07-11
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.