V Carson1, R L Rinaldi1, B Torrance2, K Maximova3, G D C Ball4, S R Majumdar5, R C Plotnikoff6, P Veugelers3, N G Boulé1, P Wozny7, L McCargar8, S Downs9, C Daymont10, R Lewanczuk11, J McGavock10. 1. Faculty of Physical Education and Recreation, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. 2. Ever Active Schools, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. 3. School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. 4. Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. 5. 1] School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada [2] Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. 6. Priority Research Centre in Physical Activity and Nutrition, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia. 7. Black Gold Regional Schools, Leduc, Alberta, Canada. 8. Faculty of Agricultural, Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. 9. Menzies Centre for Health Policy, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. 10. Manitoba Institute of Child Health, Department of Pediatrics and Child Health, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada. 11. Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine the longitudinal associations between different physical activity (PA) intensities and cardiometabolic risk factors among a sample of Canadian youth. METHODS: The findings are based on a 2-year prospective cohort study in a convenience sample of 315 youth aged 9-15 years at baseline from rural and urban schools in Alberta, Canada. Different intensities (light, moderate and vigorous) of PA were objectively assessed with Actical accelerometers. The main outcome measures were body mass index (BMI) z-score, waist circumference, cardiorespiratory fitness and systolic blood pressure at 2-year-follow-up and conditional BMI z-score velocity. A series of linear regression models were conducted to investigate the associations after adjusting for potential confounders. RESULTS: At follow-up, cardiorespiratory fitness increased (quartile 1 vs quartile 4=43.3 vs 50.2; P(trend)<0.01) and waist circumference decreased (quartile 1 vs quartile 4=79.0 vs 72.6; P(trend)=0.04; boys only) in a dose-response manner across quartiles of baseline vigorous-intensity PA. A similar trend was observed for systolic blood pressure (quartile 1 vs quartile 4=121.8 vs 115.3; P(trend)=0.07; boys only). Compared with quartile 1 of vigorous-intensity PA, BMI z-score at follow-up and conditional BMI z-score velocity were significantly lower in the quartile 2 and 3 (P<0.05). Waist circumference at follow-up also decreased (quartile 1 vs quartile 4=75.3 vs 73.8; P(trend)=0.04) across quartiles of baseline moderate-intensity PA. CONCLUSIONS: Time spent in vigorous-intensity PA was associated with several positive health outcomes 2 years later. These findings suggest that high-intensity activities in youth help to reduce the risk for several chronic diseases.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the longitudinal associations between different physical activity (PA) intensities and cardiometabolic risk factors among a sample of Canadian youth. METHODS: The findings are based on a 2-year prospective cohort study in a convenience sample of 315 youth aged 9-15 years at baseline from rural and urban schools in Alberta, Canada. Different intensities (light, moderate and vigorous) of PA were objectively assessed with Actical accelerometers. The main outcome measures were body mass index (BMI) z-score, waist circumference, cardiorespiratory fitness and systolic blood pressure at 2-year-follow-up and conditional BMI z-score velocity. A series of linear regression models were conducted to investigate the associations after adjusting for potential confounders. RESULTS: At follow-up, cardiorespiratory fitness increased (quartile 1 vs quartile 4=43.3 vs 50.2; P(trend)<0.01) and waist circumference decreased (quartile 1 vs quartile 4=79.0 vs 72.6; P(trend)=0.04; boys only) in a dose-response manner across quartiles of baseline vigorous-intensity PA. A similar trend was observed for systolic blood pressure (quartile 1 vs quartile 4=121.8 vs 115.3; P(trend)=0.07; boys only). Compared with quartile 1 of vigorous-intensity PA, BMI z-score at follow-up and conditional BMI z-score velocity were significantly lower in the quartile 2 and 3 (P<0.05). Waist circumference at follow-up also decreased (quartile 1 vs quartile 4=75.3 vs 73.8; P(trend)=0.04) across quartiles of baseline moderate-intensity PA. CONCLUSIONS: Time spent in vigorous-intensity PA was associated with several positive health outcomes 2 years later. These findings suggest that high-intensity activities in youth help to reduce the risk for several chronic diseases.
Authors: Kate E Storey; Laura E Forbes; Shawn N Fraser; John C Spence; Ronald C Plotnikoff; Kim D Raine; Rhona M Hanning; Linda J McCargar Journal: Public Health Nutr Date: 2009-06-23 Impact factor: 4.022
Authors: D Moliner-Urdiales; J R Ruiz; F B Ortega; J P Rey-Lopez; G Vicente-Rodriguez; V España-Romero; D Munguía-Izquierdo; M J Castillo; M Sjöström; L A Moreno Journal: Int J Obes (Lond) Date: 2009-07-14 Impact factor: 5.095
Authors: Juhee Kim; Aviva Must; Garrett M Fitzmaurice; Matthew W Gillman; Virginia Chomitz; Ellen Kramer; Robert McGowan; Karen E Peterson Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2005-07-28 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Thomas G Pickering; John E Hall; Lawrence J Appel; Bonita E Falkner; John Graves; Martha N Hill; Daniel W Jones; Theodore Kurtz; Sheldon G Sheps; Edward J Roccella Journal: Circulation Date: 2005-02-08 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: June Stevens; David M Murray; Chris D Baggett; John P Elder; Timothy G Lohman; Leslie A Lytle; Russell R Pate; Charlotte A Pratt; Margarita S Treuth; Larry S Webber; Deborah R Young Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2007-09-12 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Lars Bo Andersen; Maarike Harro; Luis B Sardinha; Karsten Froberg; Ulf Ekelund; Søren Brage; Sigmund Alfred Anderssen Journal: Lancet Date: 2006-07-22 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Chris J Riddoch; Sam D Leary; Andy R Ness; Steven N Blair; Kevin Deere; Calum Mattocks; Alex Griffiths; George Davey Smith; Kate Tilling Journal: BMJ Date: 2009-11-26
Authors: K Bammann; W Gwozdz; C Pischke; G Eiben; J M Fernandez-Alvira; S De Henauw; L Lissner; L A Moreno; Y Pitsiladis; L Reisch; T Veidebaum; I Pigeot Journal: Int J Obes (Lond) Date: 2016-08-16 Impact factor: 5.095