Literature DB >> 23886428

Self-reported hearing loss in baby boomers from the Busselton Healthy Ageing Study: audiometric correspondence and predictive value.

De Wet Swanepoel1, Robert H Eikelboom, Michael L Hunter, Peter L Friedland, Marcus D Atlas.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The baby boomer population will become high users of the health-care system in coming years. Self-report of hearing loss at a primary health-care visit may offer timely referrals to audiological services, but there has been no population-based study of self-reported hearing loss in the baby boomer generation.
PURPOSE: To determine the clinical value and audiometric correspondence of self-reported hearing loss as a screening tool for the baby boomer population. RESEARCH
DESIGN: A population-based study, Busselton Healthy Ageing Study (BHAS), surveying baby boomers born between 1946 and 1964 from the shire of Busselton, Western Australia. STUDY SAMPLE: A randomized sample of noninstitutionalized baby-boomers listed on the electoral roll (n = 6690) and resident in the shire are eligible to participate. This study reports on data from the first 1004 attendees (53.5% female) with a mean age of 56.23 (SD = 5.43). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data from a self-report question on hearing loss and diagnostic pure tone audiometry was utilized for this study. Analysis included screening performance measures of self-report compared to audiometric cut-offs, receiver operator curve (ROC) to determine optimal level, analysis of variance to compare hearing status to self-report, and binary logistic regression to determine best audiometric predictors.
RESULTS: Of the sample, 16% self-reported hearing loss (72.1% males). Logistic regression indicated 4000 Hz as the most important individual frequency related to self-report while the four-frequency average (500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz) >25 dB in the worse ear was the most significant averaged cutoff with 68% sensitivity and 87% specificity. Of those who self-reported a hearing loss, 80% had either a four-frequency average hearing loss >25 dB in the worse ear or a high-frequency average (4000 and 8000 Hz) hearing loss greater than 35 dB in the worse ear.
CONCLUSIONS: Baby boomer adults who self-report hearing impairment on direct inquiry are most likely to have a hearing loss. A simple question at a primary health care visit may facilitate a timely referral for audiological services in a baby boomer adult, who may be more amenable to rehabilitation. American Academy of Audiology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23886428     DOI: 10.3766/jaaa.24.6.7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol        ISSN: 1050-0545            Impact factor:   1.664


  12 in total

1.  Factors associated with the accuracy of subjective assessments of hearing impairment.

Authors:  Rebecca J Kamil; Dane J Genther; Frank R Lin
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Distribution characteristics of normal pure-tone thresholds.

Authors:  Robert H Margolis; Richard H Wilson; Gerald R Popelka; Robert H Eikelboom; De Wet Swanepoel; George L Saly
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2015-05-04       Impact factor: 2.117

3.  Distribution Characteristics of Air-Bone Gaps: Evidence of Bias in Manual Audiometry.

Authors:  Robert H Margolis; Richard H Wilson; Gerald R Popelka; Robert H Eikelboom; De Wet Swanepoel; George L Saly
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Skin Pigmentation and Risk of Hearing Loss in Women.

Authors:  Brian M Lin; Wen-Qing Li; Sharon G Curhan; Konstantina M Stankovic; Abrar A Qureshi; Gary C Curhan
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  Prospective Study of Gastroesophageal Reflux, Use of Proton Pump Inhibitors and H2-Receptor Antagonists, and Risk of Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Brian M Lin; Sharon G Curhan; Molin Wang; Brian C Jacobson; Roland Eavey; Konstantina M Stankovic; Gary C Curhan
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Hypertension, Diuretic Use, and Risk of Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Brian M Lin; Sharon G Curhan; Molin Wang; Roland Eavey; Konstantina M Stankovic; Gary C Curhan
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 4.965

7.  Subjective and clinically assessed hearing loss; a cross-sectional register-based study on a swedish population aged 18 through 50 years.

Authors:  Pernilla Videhult Pierre; Ann-Christin Johnson; Anders Fridberger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-13       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Discrepancy between self-assessed hearing status and measured audiometric evaluation.

Authors:  So Young Kim; Hyung-Jong Kim; Min-Su Kim; Bumjung Park; Jin-Hwan Kim; Hyo Geun Choi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-08       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Discrepancies between self-reported hearing difficulty and hearing loss diagnosed by audiometry: prevalence and associated factors in a national survey.

Authors:  Ji Eun Choi; Il Joon Moon; Sun-Young Baek; Seon Woo Kim; Yang-Sun Cho
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Self-Reported Hearing Loss and Pure Tone Audiometry for Screening in Primary Health Care Clinics.

Authors:  Christine Louw; De Wet Swanepoel; Robert H Eikelboom
Journal:  J Prim Care Community Health       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.