Literature DB >> 23886232

Bioavailability of epinephrine from Auvi-Q compared with EpiPen.

Eric S Edwards1, Ronald Gunn, Estelle R Simons, Kathy Carr, Vernon M Chinchilli, Gwendolyn Painter, Ronald Goldwater.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Epinephrine autoinjectors are underused for the treatment of anaphylaxis in community settings. Auvi-Q, a novel epinephrine autoinjector, was designed to be intuitive to use and reduce the potential for use-related errors.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the bioavailability of 0.3 mg of epinephrine (adrenaline) injected with Auvi-Q and EpiPen in healthy adults.
METHODS: In this randomized, single-blind, 2-treatment, 3-period, 3-sequence crossover study, healthy adults (18-45 years old) received a single injection of 0.3 mg of epinephrine with Auvi-Q in one period and with EpiPen in the other 2 periods. Blood samples were obtained before and 14 times during 6 hours after the dose. Outcomes included peak plasma concentration (Cmax), total epinephrine exposure (area under the concentration-time curve [AUC] from baseline to the last measurable concentration [AUC0-t] and extrapolated to infinity [AUCinf]), and adverse events.
RESULTS: Seventy-one volunteers (53 male, 74.6%), with a mean age of 33.2 years and a mean body mass index of 25.4, were randomized. Epinephrine peak concentration and total exposure were similar between Auvi-Q (Cmax = 0.486 ng/mL; AUC0-t = 0.536 ng·h/mL; AUCinf = 0.724 ng·h/mL) and EpiPen (Cmax = 0.520 ng/mL; AUC0-t = 0.466 ng·h/mL; AUCinf = 0.583 ng·h/mL). Cmax and AUC analyses demonstrated bioequivalence between Auvi-Q and EpiPen. Most treatment-emergent adverse events were mild (98%), and all resolved spontaneously. Rates of injection-site pain and bleeding were 13% and 5%, respectively, for Auvi-Q vs 24% and 10%, respectively, for EpiPen.
CONCLUSION: After a single injection of 0.3 mg of epinephrine, Auvi-Q and EpiPen had similar peak and total epinephrine exposure, were bioequivalent, and had similar safety profiles.
Copyright © 2013 American College of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23886232     DOI: 10.1016/j.anai.2013.06.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol        ISSN: 1081-1206            Impact factor:   6.347


  5 in total

Review 1.  Systematic review of outcome measures in trials of pediatric anaphylaxis treatment.

Authors:  Tamar Rubin; Jacqueline Clayton; Denise Adams; Hsing Jou; Sunita Vohra
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 2.125

2.  International consensus on (ICON) anaphylaxis.

Authors:  F Estelle R Simons; Ledit Rf Ardusso; M Beatrice Bilò; Victoria Cardona; Motohiro Ebisawa; Yehia M El-Gamal; Phil Lieberman; Richard F Lockey; Antonella Muraro; Graham Roberts; Mario Sanchez-Borges; Aziz Sheikh; Lynette P Shek; Dana V Wallace; Margitta Worm
Journal:  World Allergy Organ J       Date:  2014-05-30       Impact factor: 4.084

3.  Intranasal epinephrine in dogs: Pharmacokinetic and heart rate effects.

Authors:  Kenneth L Dretchen; Zack Mesa; Matthew Robben; Desmond Slade; Scott Hill; Claire Croutch; Kyle Kappeler; Michael Mesa
Journal:  Pharmacol Res Perspect       Date:  2020-04

Review 4.  Autoinjector device for rapid administration of drugs and antidotes in emergency situations and in mass casualty management.

Authors:  Rajagopalan Vijayaraghavan
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 1.671

5.  Do epinephrine auto-injectors have an unsuitable needle length in children and adolescents at risk for anaphylaxis from food allergy?

Authors:  Sten Dreborg; Xia Wen; Laura Kim; Gina Tsai; Immaculate Nevis; Ryan Potts; Jack Chiu; Arunmozhi Dominic; Harold Kim
Journal:  Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol       Date:  2016-03-06       Impact factor: 3.406

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.