Literature DB >> 23884794

Risk stratification to predict pain during unsedated colonoscopy: results of a multicenter cohort study.

Oyvind Holme1, Michael Bretthauer, Thomas de Lange, Birgitte Seip, Gert Huppertz-Hauss, Ole Høie, Per Sandvei, Carl Magnus Ystrøm, Geir Hoff.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Colonoscopy without sedation has several advantages over sedated colonoscopy, but a considerable proportion of patients experience pain. The aim of this study was to develop a risk stratification model of pre-examination risk factors to enable targeted sedation during colonoscopy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between October 2011 and January 2012, consecutive outpatients who were willing to start colonoscopy without sedation at 11 Norwegian centers were prospectively recruited. Patients recorded pain on a validated 4-point scale (none, slight, moderate, or severe pain). Potential risk factors for a painful procedure (defined as moderate or severe pain) were evaluated using multivariate logistic regression analyses, and the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROC) was calculated to assess the discriminatory ability of the derived model.
RESULTS: A total of 1198 patients (635 men and 563 women) were included. Seven independent, pre-procedural risk factors for patient pain were identified: female sex, age < 40 years, previous abdominal surgery, abdominal pain as indication for colonoscopy, anticipation of pain, previous painful colonoscopy, and a history of diverticulitis. In patients with 0, 1, 2, or ≥ 3 risk factors, a painful colonoscopy was experienced by 35 %, 43 %, 52 %, and 63 % of women and 18 %, 24 %, 35 %, and 63 % of men, respectively. The model showed modest discrimination abilities (AUROC = 0.69).
CONCLUSION: Female sex was a strong risk factor for pain during colonoscopy, and sedation or analgesia should be considered for all women prior to colonoscopy. For male patients, the presence of multiple risk factors should encourage the endoscopist to offer sedation. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23884794     DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1344239

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endoscopy        ISSN: 0013-726X            Impact factor:   10.093


  9 in total

1.  [Risk factors of pain during colonoscopic examination].

Authors:  Xue-Ying Lai; Xiao-Wei Tang; Si-Lin Huang; Wei Gong; Fa-Chao Zhi; Si-de Liu; Ye Chen
Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao       Date:  2016-04-20

2.  Alleviating Pregastroscopy Anxiety Using Mobile Social Media Application.

Authors:  Dan Lu; Jing-Hua Wang; Chao Lu; Zheng-Lv Liu; Ajay Jain; Feng Ji; Qing Gu
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-06-22

3.  Assessment of pain between sedated and unsedated colonoscopy: Double-blind randomized clinical trail.

Authors:  Ahmad Shavakhi; Mahsa Khodadoostan; Seid Javad Shariaat Nabavi; Sina Sadeghian; Ali Gholamrezaei; Alireza Shavakhi
Journal:  J Res Med Sci       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 1.852

4.  Evidence to suggest adoption of water exchange deserves broader consideration: Its pain alleviating impact occurs in 90% of investigators.

Authors:  Sergio Cadoni; Mauro Liggi; Premysl Falt; Stefano Sanna; Mariangela Argiolas; Viviana Fanari; Paolo Gallittu; Donatella Mura; Maria L Porcedda; Vit Smajstrla; Matteo Erriu; Felix W Leung
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2016-01-25

5.  Population-Based Colonoscopy Screening for Colorectal Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Michael Bretthauer; Michal F Kaminski; Magnus Løberg; Ann G Zauber; Jaroslaw Regula; Ernst J Kuipers; Miguel A Hernán; Eleanor McFadden; Annike Sunde; Mette Kalager; Evelien Dekker; Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar; Kjetil Garborg; Maciej Rupinski; Manon C W Spaander; Marek Bugajski; Ole Høie; Tryggvi Stefansson; Geir Hoff; Hans-Olov Adami
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 21.873

6.  Effectiveness of flexible sigmoidoscopy screening in men and women and different age groups: pooled analysis of randomised trials.

Authors:  Øyvind Holme; Robert E Schoen; Carlo Senore; Nereo Segnan; Geir Hoff; Magnus Løberg; Michael Bretthauer; Hans-Olov Adami; Mette Kalager
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2017-01-13

7.  A novel intubation discomfort score to predict painful unsedated colonoscopy.

Authors:  Limei Wang; Hui Jia; Hui Luo; Xiaoyu Kang; Linhui Zhang; Xiangping Wang; Shaowei Yao; Qin Tao; Yanglin Pan; Xuegang Guo
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 1.817

8.  Interobserver variability in comfort scores for screening colonoscopy.

Authors:  David N Naumann; Sarah Potter-Concannon; Sharad Karandikar
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-03-22

9.  Public preferences for using quantitative faecal immunochemical test versus colonoscopy as diagnostic test for colorectal cancer: evidence from an online survey.

Authors:  Christian von Wagner; Wouter Verstraete; Yasemin Hirst; Brian D Nicholson; Sandro T Stoffel; Helga Laszlo
Journal:  BJGP Open       Date:  2020-05-01
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.