Literature DB >> 23884377

Psychometric validation of the Italian version of the I-QoL questionnaire: clinical and urodynamic findings.

Federica Possavino1, Mario Preti, Roberto Carone, Roberto Calabrese, Sara Randaccio, Chiara D'Elia, Ilaria Allais, Stefano Cosma, Chiara Benedetto.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The aim was to validate the Italian version of the Incontinence-Quality of Life questionnaire (I-QoL) in women with clinical and urodynamic urinary incontinence (UI). A secondary end point was to compare the results of women with reported UI, but negative urodynamic findings.
METHODS: The Italian translation of the I-QoL was administered to 267 Italian women with pelvic organ prolapse < stage III, and who had undergone previous surgical or medical therapy for UI. Cronbach's alpha was calculated to assess internal consistency of the I-QoL items. Reproducibility was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Convergent validity involved comparison of I-QoL scores and the Short Form-36 Health questionnaire.
RESULTS: One hundred and sixty-seven patients were considered for the primary end point: 47 had a negative history of UI and a normal urodynamic test, 120 complained of UI confirmed by a urodynamic test, 59 had a positive history for UI and a urodynamic test negative for UI, and 35 patients not reporting UI had a positive urodynamic test. The I-QoL score revealed that the QoL was lower in patients with reported UI, irrespective of urodynamic findings. The overall I-QoL summary score and subscales showed high internal consistency (alpha ranges from 0.88 to 0.96). ICC ranged from 0.98 to 0.99, demonstrating the stability of the scores. The physical domain of the I-QoL showed a 0.27 correlation with the physical functioning subscale of the SF-36. No significant difference in I-QoL scores was found among various types of UI.
CONCLUSION: The Italian translated version of the I-QoL is reliable, consistent and a valid instrument for assessing impact on quality of life in Italian speaking women with UI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23884377     DOI: 10.1007/s00192-013-2134-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J        ISSN: 0937-3462            Impact factor:   2.894


  16 in total

Review 1.  Assessing health status and quality-of-life instruments: attributes and review criteria.

Authors:  Neil Aaronson; Jordi Alonso; Audrey Burnam; Kathleen N Lohr; Donald L Patrick; Edward Perrin; Ruth E Stein
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction.

Authors:  R C Bump; A Mattiasson; K Bø; L P Brubaker; J O DeLancey; P Klarskov; B L Shull; A R Smith
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Quality of life of women with urinary incontinence: cross-cultural performance of 15 language versions of the I-QOL.

Authors:  Donald M Bushnell; Mona L Martin; Kent H Summers; Jan Svihra; Christos Lionis; Donald L Patrick
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Prevalence and trends of urinary incontinence in adults in the United States, 2001 to 2008.

Authors:  Alayne D Markland; Holly E Richter; Chyng-Wen Fwu; Paul Eggers; John W Kusek
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  The Bristol Female Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms questionnaire: development and psychometric testing.

Authors:  S Jackson; J Donovan; S Brookes; S Eckford; L Swithinbank; P Abrams
Journal:  Br J Urol       Date:  1996-06

6.  Development of a symptom severity index and a symptom impact index for stress incontinence in women.

Authors:  N Black; J Griffiths; C Pope
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.696

7.  Which women with stress incontinence require urodynamic evaluation?

Authors:  A C Weidner; E R Myers; A G Visco; G W Cundiff; R C Bump
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Cultural adaptation of a quality-of-life measure for urinary incontinence.

Authors:  D L Patrick; M L Martin; D M Bushnell; P Marquis; C M Andrejasich; D P Buesching
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 20.096

9.  Validation of two global impression questionnaires for incontinence.

Authors:  Ilker Yalcin; Richard C Bump
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 8.661

10.  Quality of life of women with urinary incontinence: further development of the incontinence quality of life instrument (I-QOL)

Authors:  D L Patrick; M L Martin; D M Bushnell; I Yalcin; T H Wagner; D P Buesching
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 2.649

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Patient reported outcome measures in neurogenic bladder.

Authors:  Roderick Clark; Blayne Welk
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2016-02
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.