AIM: Malnutrition is common in the hospitalized elderly with hip fractures and has been linked to poorer recovery and increased complications. Hence, the aim of this study is to investigate whether nutrition support team (NST) intervention has a beneficial effect on rehabilitation outcome in the elderly, especially in the oldest-old patients with hip fracture using the Functional Independence Measure (FIM). METHOD: Patients were classified into two groups before and after NST intervention, and we evaluated FIM gain, FIM efficacy, and discharge outcomes. Every item was compared in low-ADL patients with an FIM of 54 or less on admission. RESULTS: The numbers of patients were 18 in the non-NST and 22 in the NST group. Although nutritional indicators on admission showed no significant difference in the groups, FIM gain and FIM efficacy were significantly higher (p<0.01) and walking ability at discharge was better in the NST group (p<0.05). In low-ADL patients, the same results were confirmed. CONCLUSION: Although the malnourished patients often have a poor prognosis, there was a significant improvement in rehabilitation effect and discharge outcome in the NST group. Thus, these results suggest the effectiveness of multidisciplinary NST intervention. Moreover, even in elderly patients with low ADL on admission, significant effect of rehabilitation can be expected by appropriate nutritional management.
AIM: Malnutrition is common in the hospitalized elderly with hip fractures and has been linked to poorer recovery and increased complications. Hence, the aim of this study is to investigate whether nutrition support team (NST) intervention has a beneficial effect on rehabilitation outcome in the elderly, especially in the oldest-old patients with hip fracture using the Functional Independence Measure (FIM). METHOD:Patients were classified into two groups before and after NST intervention, and we evaluated FIM gain, FIM efficacy, and discharge outcomes. Every item was compared in low-ADL patients with an FIM of 54 or less on admission. RESULTS: The numbers of patients were 18 in the non-NST and 22 in the NST group. Although nutritional indicators on admission showed no significant difference in the groups, FIM gain and FIM efficacy were significantly higher (p<0.01) and walking ability at discharge was better in the NST group (p<0.05). In low-ADL patients, the same results were confirmed. CONCLUSION: Although the malnourished patients often have a poor prognosis, there was a significant improvement in rehabilitation effect and discharge outcome in the NST group. Thus, these results suggest the effectiveness of multidisciplinary NST intervention. Moreover, even in elderly patients with low ADL on admission, significant effect of rehabilitation can be expected by appropriate nutritional management.