Literature DB >> 23883239

Diagnostic performance of cardiac stress perfusion MRI in the detection of coronary artery disease using fractional flow reserve as the reference standard: a meta-analysis.

Ravi R Desai1, Saurabh Jha.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE. This is an analysis of pooled studies for the determination of the test characteristics of stress perfusion cardiac MRI in the diagnosis of flow-limiting obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) using fractional flow reserve (FFR) at catheter coronary angiography as the reference standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Traditionally, planimetric measurement of coronary stenosis at catheter coronary angiography has been considered the reference standard and has been used to verify the diagnostic characteristics of gatekeeper tests. FFR is a physiologic measure of flow limitation and is considered a more authentic reference standard in the diagnosis of CAD. The emergence of a new reference standard questions the true diagnostic accuracy of gatekeeper tests. A systematic literature review was performed for qualifying studies. The DerSimonian-Laird random effects model and a random-effects symmetric summary receiver operating characteristic curve analysis were performed. RESULTS. Twelve studies (761 patients) met the inclusion criteria. Four hundred six stenotic coronary arteries had FFR less than 0.75. Perfusion stress MRI has a sensitivity of 89.1% (95% CI, 84-93%) and specificity of 84.9% (95% CI, 76.6-91.1%) on a patient basis and a sensitivity of 87.7% (95% CI, 84.4-90.6%) and specificity of 88.6% (95% CI, 86.7-90.4%) on a coronary territory basis. CONCLUSION. Stress perfusion MRI remains an accurate test for the detection of flow-limiting stenosis when adjudicated by a physiologic reference standard.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23883239     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.12.10002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  14 in total

Review 1.  Fractional flow reserve derived from coronary CT angiography in stable coronary disease: a new standard in non-invasive testing?

Authors:  B L Nørgaard; J M Jensen; J Leipsic
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-02-14       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Coronary Physiology Assessment for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Stable Ischemic Heart Disease.

Authors:  Ali E Denktas; David Paniagua; Hani Jneid
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 5.113

Review 3.  Diagnostic performance and comparative cost-effectiveness of non-invasive imaging tests in patients presenting with chronic stable chest pain with suspected coronary artery disease: a systematic overview.

Authors:  Claudia N van Waardhuizen; Marieke Langhout; Felisia Ly; Loes Braun; Tessa S S Genders; Steffen E Petersen; Kirsten E Fleischmann; Koen Nieman; M G Myriam Hunink
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.931

4.  [Radiological imaging to assess individual cardiovascular risk].

Authors:  A D Ordu; K Rippel; L T Garthe; C Scheurig-Münkler; T Kröncke; F Schwarz
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 5.  Clinical Utility and Future Applications of PET/CT and PET/CMR in Cardiology.

Authors:  Jonathan A Pan; Michael Salerno
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2016-09-02

Review 6.  Diagnostic performance of semi-quantitative and quantitative stress CMR perfusion analysis: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  R van Dijk; M van Assen; R Vliegenthart; G H de Bock; P van der Harst; M Oudkerk
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 5.364

Review 7.  Role of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in acute and chronic ischemic heart disease.

Authors:  A Baritussio; A Scatteia; C Bucciarelli-Ducci
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-03-18       Impact factor: 2.357

8.  Diagnostic Performance of Coronary CT Angiography, Stress Dual-Energy CT Perfusion, and Stress Perfusion Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography for Coronary Artery Disease: Comparison with Combined Invasive Coronary Angiography and Stress Perfusion Cardiac MRI.

Authors:  Hyun Woo Chung; Sung Min Ko; Hweung Kon Hwang; Young So; Jeong Geun Yi; Eun Jeong Lee
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 3.500

9.  Diagnostic Accuracy of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Versus Fractional Flow Reserve: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Waqas Ullah; Sohaib Roomi; Hafez M Abdullah; Maryam Mukhtar; Zain Ali; Ping Ye; Donald C Haas; Vincent M Figueredo
Journal:  Cardiol Res       Date:  2020-05-03

10.  Data on diagnostic performance of stress perfusion cardiac magnetic resonance for coronary artery disease detection at the vessel level.

Authors:  Apostolos Kiaos; Ioannis Tziatzios; Stavros Hadjimiltiades; Charalambos Karvounis; Theodoros D Karamitsos
Journal:  Data Brief       Date:  2017-12-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.