Literature DB >> 23882173

Taking integrated care forward: the need for shared values.

Nick Goodwin1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2013        PMID: 23882173      PMCID: PMC3718261          DOI: 10.5334/ijic.1180

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Integr Care            Impact factor:   5.120


× No keyword cloud information.

Taking integrated care forward: the need for shared values

At our recent 13th International Conference on Integrated Care we examined a number of key challenges to the successful adoption of integrated care [1]. The focus of debate centred on four key systemic questions: what kinds of payment system best incentivise integrated care?; which organisational solutions are most effective?; how can care be better co-ordinated around people’s needs?; and what implementation strategies are likely to be most effective to stimulate change? Underpinning the discussion was an acute sense that the adoption of integrated care principles into health and social care systems was too slow to meet the present and future needs of ageing populations with ever more complex and long-term medical problems. Keynote speakers variously described the need to adopt integrated care ‘at scale and pace’ [2] or ‘with speed and spread’ [3] and so outlined a range of potential strategies to support this. Hence, it was argued, short-term, small-scale, disease-based and organisationally-driven solutions should be avoided. Instead, strategies based on achieving long-term goals to the wider benefit of people and populations were needed backed up by political support, visionary leadership and the promotion of common values. The issue of developing a collaborative culture has often been put forward as a key ingredient to making a success of integrated care. What was striking during the conference was the consistent emphasis placed on ‘creating energy for change’ through, for example: building ‘a community of peers to accelerate learning and improvement’ [3]; and ‘raise joy, professional pride and support, and recognise the real value [of their work] for society’ [4]. In other words, the ability to build social capital and promote engagement and learning between partners in care was argued to be a pre-requisite to accelerating the pace of adoption. The importance of developing shared values in taking integrated care forward was driven home to me at a recent meeting to examine the collective experience and learning from five UK-based case studies of care co-ordination to people with complex needs [5]. A characteristic underpinning the success of each case study was the personal commitment of staff—both managers and professionals—to go that ‘extra mile’ by working beyond the boundaries of their job description in order to achieve the best results for their clients and in supporting colleagues to do the same. Lying behind this finding was a range of explicit strategies that promoted a strong ethos amongst staff to ‘do the right thing’—for example: promoting the needs of clients before themselves; supporting knowledge-sharing; and enabling role-substitution and subsidiarity through staff empowerment. The problem with promoting the idea that a values-driven approach should be a pre-requisite to the successful adoption of integrated care is that the weight of both evidence and experience predicts that such a process requires considerable time and effort. Moreover, given the mismatch of motives that exists when integrating the work of professionals and organisations, such efforts often go unrewarded and/or require continual negotiation. Hence, rather than being perceived as a catalyst for change, leaders and managers tasked with applying integrated care ‘at scale and pace’ might instead focus on driving forward the organisational solution or introduce various financial inducements in the hope this will be more effective. Such an approach would be a mistake. When looking at successful implementation strategies in integrated care it is clear no short cuts exist—it takes visionary and stable leadership over the long-term to build the collaborative culture necessary to take integrated care forward. As a final point, there was consensus during the conference that the ability to drive integrated care at a regional or local scale—and hence to make the necessary decision to invest the time and resources to build networks and alliances—relies on political will and commitment. Today, the principles of integrated care have become a high political priority for many national governments and regions. It is to be hoped that this political support will remain for the long-term since, as the history of integrated care tells us, successful adoption takes time as well as commitment. Our 14th International Conference on Integrated Care, to be held in Brussels on 3–4 April 2014, will examine ‘taking integrated care forward’ as its major theme [6]. In particular, it will focus on how the right policies and change management strategies can support the ambition to accelerate the successful adoption of integrated care in practice.
  14 in total

1.  Goal-Oriented Care: A Catalyst for Person-Centred System Integration.

Authors:  Carolyn Steele Gray; Agnes Grudniewicz; Alana Armas; James Mold; Jennifer Im; Pauline Boeckxstaens
Journal:  Int J Integr Care       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 5.120

2.  Bridging the Gap between Theory and Practice in Integrated Care: The Case of the Diabetic Foot Pathway in Tuscany.

Authors:  Sabina Nuti; Barbara Bini; Tommaso Grillo Ruggieri; Alberto Piaggesi; Lucia Ricci
Journal:  Int J Integr Care       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 5.120

3.  Values of Integrated Care: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Nick Zonneveld; Naomi Driessen; René A J Stüssgen; Mirella M N Minkman
Journal:  Int J Integr Care       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 5.120

4.  Developing Normative Integration among Professionals in an Intersectoral Collaboration: A Multi-Method Investigation of an Integrated Intervention for People on Sick Leave Due to Common Mental Disorders.

Authors:  Rie Mandrup Poulsen; Kathrine Hoffmann Pii; Ute Bültmann; Mathias Meijer; Lene Falgaard Eplov; Karen Albertsen; Ulla Christensen
Journal:  Int J Integr Care       Date:  2019-11-04       Impact factor: 5.120

5.  Exploring the Quality Paradigms in Integrated Care: The Need for Emergence and Reflection.

Authors:  Everard van Kemenade; Wilma van der Vlegel-Brouwer; Marjolein van der Vlegel
Journal:  Int J Integr Care       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 5.120

6.  How Different Quality Paradigms Undermine a Shared Value Base for Integrated Care: The Need for Collective Reflexivity.

Authors:  Everard van Kemenade; Marlou de Kuiper; Marjolijn Booij; Mirella Minkman
Journal:  Int J Integr Care       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 5.120

7.  Co-Leadership - A Management Solution for Integrated Health and Social Care.

Authors:  Charlotte Klinga; Johan Hansson; Henna Hasson; Magna Andreen Sachs
Journal:  Int J Integr Care       Date:  2016-05-23       Impact factor: 5.120

8.  Comparing International Models of Integrated Care: How Can We Learn Across Borders?

Authors:  Carolyn Steele Gray; Nick Zonneveld; Mylaine Breton; Paul Wankah; James Shaw; Geoff M Anderson; Walter P Wodchis
Journal:  Int J Integr Care       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 5.120

9.  Piloting a web-based systematic collection and reporting of patient-reported outcome measures and patient-reported experience measures in chronic heart failure.

Authors:  Francesca Pennucci; Sabina De Rosis; Claudio Passino
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-10-05       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  How to Improve Integrated Care for People with Chronic Conditions: Key Findings from EU FP-7 Project INTEGRATE and Beyond.

Authors:  Liesbeth Borgermans; Yannick Marchal; Loraine Busetto; Jorid Kalseth; Frida Kasteng; Kadri Suija; Marje Oona; Olena Tigova; Magda Rösenmuller; Dirk Devroey
Journal:  Int J Integr Care       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 5.120

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.