Literature DB >> 23882029

Interrogating cAMP-dependent kinase signaling in Jurkat T cells via a protein kinase A targeted immune-precipitation phosphoproteomics approach.

Piero Giansanti1, Matthew P Stokes, Jeffrey C Silva, Arjen Scholten, Albert J R Heck.   

Abstract

In the past decade, mass-spectrometry-based methods have emerged for the quantitative profiling of dynamic changes in protein phosphorylation, allowing the behavior of thousands of phosphorylation sites to be monitored in a single experiment. However, when one is interested in specific signaling pathways, such shotgun methodologies are not ideal because they lack selectivity and are not cost and time efficient with respect to instrument and data analysis time. Here we evaluate and explore a peptide-centric antibody generated to selectively enrich peptides containing the cAMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA) consensus motif. This targeted phosphoproteomic strategy is used to profile temporal quantitative changes of potential PKA substrates in Jurkat T lymphocytes upon prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) stimulation, which increases intracellular cAMP, activating PKA. Our method combines ultra-high-specificity motif-based immunoaffinity purification with cost-efficient stable isotope dimethyl labeling. We identified 655 phosphopeptides, of which 642 (i.e. 98%) contained the consensus motif [R/K][R/K/X]X[pS/pT]. When our data were compared with a large-scale Jurkat T-lymphocyte phosphoproteomics dataset containing more than 10,500 phosphosites, a minimal overlap of 0.2% was observed. This stresses the need for such targeted analyses when the interest is in a particular kinase. Our data provide a resource of likely substrates of PKA, and potentially some substrates of closely related kinases. Network analysis revealed that about half of the observed substrates have been implicated in cAMP-induced signaling. Still, the other half of the here-identified substrates have been less well characterized, representing a valuable resource for future research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23882029      PMCID: PMC3820945          DOI: 10.1074/mcp.O113.028456

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics        ISSN: 1535-9476            Impact factor:   5.911


  53 in total

1.  Performance characteristics of electron transfer dissociation mass spectrometry.

Authors:  David M Good; Matthew Wirtala; Graeme C McAlister; Joshua J Coon
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2007-08-01       Impact factor: 5.911

2.  Electrostatic repulsion hydrophilic interaction chromatography for isocratic separation of charged solutes and selective isolation of phosphopeptides.

Authors:  Andrew J Alpert
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2007-11-21       Impact factor: 6.986

Review 3.  Quantitative mass spectrometry in proteomics: a critical review.

Authors:  Marcus Bantscheff; Markus Schirle; Gavain Sweetman; Jens Rick; Bernhard Kuster
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2007-08-01       Impact factor: 4.142

4.  Hydrophilic interaction chromatography reduces the complexity of the phosphoproteome and improves global phosphopeptide isolation and detection.

Authors:  Dean E McNulty; Roland S Annan
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2008-01-22       Impact factor: 5.911

5.  Cyclin-dependent kinase 3-mediated activating transcription factor 1 phosphorylation enhances cell transformation.

Authors:  Duo Zheng; Yong-Yeon Cho; Andy T Y Lau; Jishuai Zhang; Wei-Ya Ma; Ann M Bode; Zigang Dong
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2008-09-15       Impact factor: 12.701

6.  Prostaglandin E2 impairs CD4+ T cell activation by inhibition of lck: implications in Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Authors:  Jens M Chemnitz; Julia Driesen; Sabine Classen; James L Riley; Svenja Debey; Marc Beyer; Alexey Popov; Thomas Zander; Joachim L Schultze
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2006-01-15       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  Global, in vivo, and site-specific phosphorylation dynamics in signaling networks.

Authors:  Jesper V Olsen; Blagoy Blagoev; Florian Gnad; Boris Macek; Chanchal Kumar; Peter Mortensen; Matthias Mann
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2006-11-03       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  Highly robust, automated, and sensitive online TiO2-based phosphoproteomics applied to study endogenous phosphorylation in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Martijn W H Pinkse; Shabaz Mohammed; Joost W Gouw; Bas van Breukelen; Harmjan R Vos; Albert J R Heck
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2007-11-23       Impact factor: 4.466

9.  The SCX/IMAC enrichment approach for global phosphorylation analysis by mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Judit Villén; Steven P Gygi
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 13.491

10.  Global survey of phosphotyrosine signaling identifies oncogenic kinases in lung cancer.

Authors:  Klarisa Rikova; Ailan Guo; Qingfu Zeng; Anthony Possemato; Jian Yu; Herbert Haack; Julie Nardone; Kimberly Lee; Cynthia Reeves; Yu Li; Yerong Hu; Zhiping Tan; Matthew Stokes; Laura Sullivan; Jeffrey Mitchell; Randy Wetzel; Joan Macneill; Jian Min Ren; Jin Yuan; Corey E Bakalarski; Judit Villen; Jon M Kornhauser; Bradley Smith; Daiqiang Li; Xinmin Zhou; Steven P Gygi; Ting-Lei Gu; Roberto D Polakiewicz; John Rush; Michael J Comb
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2007-12-14       Impact factor: 41.582

View more
  18 in total

1.  Highly reproducible improved label-free quantitative analysis of cellular phosphoproteome by optimization of LC-MS/MS gradient and analytical column construction.

Authors:  Nagib Ahsan; Judson Belmont; Zhuo Chen; James G Clifton; Arthur R Salomon
Journal:  J Proteomics       Date:  2017-06-17       Impact factor: 4.044

2.  Analyses of PDE-regulated phosphoproteomes reveal unique and specific cAMP-signaling modules in T cells.

Authors:  Michael-Claude G Beltejar; Ho-Tak Lau; Martin G Golkowski; Shao-En Ong; Joseph A Beavo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  K-BILDS: A Kinase Substrate Discovery Tool.

Authors:  D Maheeka Embogama; Mary Kay H Pflum
Journal:  Chembiochem       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 3.164

4.  Multiplexed Phosphoproteomic Profiling Using Titanium Dioxide and Immunoaffinity Enrichments Reveals Complementary Phosphorylation Events.

Authors:  Anthony P Possemato; Joao A Paulo; Daniel Mulhern; Ailan Guo; Steven P Gygi; Sean A Beausoleil
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2017-02-24       Impact factor: 4.466

5.  Phosphoproteomic identification of vasopressin V2 receptor-dependent signaling in the renal collecting duct.

Authors:  Venkatesh Deshpande; Anika Kao; Viswanathan Raghuram; Arnab Datta; Chung-Lin Chou; Mark A Knepper
Journal:  Am J Physiol Renal Physiol       Date:  2019-07-17

6.  Proteomic and Metabolic Analyses of S49 Lymphoma Cells Reveal Novel Regulation of Mitochondria by cAMP and Protein Kinase A.

Authors:  Andrea Wilderman; Yurong Guo; Ajit S Divakaruni; Guy Perkins; Lingzhi Zhang; Anne N Murphy; Susan S Taylor; Paul A Insel
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  Design and Profiling of a Subcellular Targeted Optogenetic cAMP-Dependent Protein Kinase.

Authors:  Colin P O'Banion; Melanie A Priestman; Robert M Hughes; Laura E Herring; Stephen J Capuzzi; David S Lawrence
Journal:  Cell Chem Biol       Date:  2017-11-05       Impact factor: 8.116

Review 8.  Phosphoproteomic Analysis as an Approach for Understanding Molecular Mechanisms of cAMP-Dependent Actions.

Authors:  Joseph A Beavo; Martin Golkowski; Masami Shimizu-Albergine; Michael-Claude Beltejar; Karin E Bornfeldt; Shao-En Ong
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2021-02-11       Impact factor: 4.054

9.  Interrogating Kinase-Substrate Relationships with Proximity Labeling and Phosphorylation Enrichment.

Authors:  Tian Zhang; Anne Fassl; Laura P Vaites; Sipei Fu; Piotr Sicinski; Joao A Paulo; Steven P Gygi
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 5.370

Review 10.  Phosphoproteomics in the Age of Rapid and Deep Proteome Profiling.

Authors:  Nicholas M Riley; Joshua J Coon
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 6.986

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.