Literature DB >> 23881932

Regulatory forum opinion piece*: supporting the need for international harmonization of safety assessments for food flavoring substances.

Yoichi Konishi1, Shim-Mo Hayashi2, Shoji Fukushima3.   

Abstract

The advancement of technology and the growth of international commerce underscore the need for global harmonization of regulatory safety requirements and their assessment pertaining to consumer products such as drugs, medical devices, and food. This need is particularly relevant when safety requirements involve time-intensive and costly animal safety studies. Here we present the current regulatory requirements in Europe, the United States, and Japan for flavoring substances (FSs) used in foods and point out significant differences relevant to the international standardization for safety assessments that in our opinion need to be addressed and overcome. The safety assessments that are carried out for FSs in various countries are influenced by divergent definitions of FS, by the information required and available for regulatory submission, and by different regulatory procedures, including the use of decision tree approaches. The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), the Expert Panel of the U.S. Flavor and Extract Manufacturers Association (FEMA), and the Joint Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO)/World Health Organization (WHO) Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA) are making efforts to improve and harmonize the safety assessment of FSs. The application of in silico methods such as quantitative structure-activity relationships and read-across strategies relying on expert input are useful as a first-step screening of the assessment. Application of the Threshold of Toxicological Concern (TTC) approach permits conclusions that are compatible with the risk assessment approaches currently used by international advisory committees. The Japanese Regulatory Authority, on the other hand, does not yet consider in silico methods but still requires in vivo and in vitro genotoxicity test data as well as repeat-dose 90-day toxicity data in at least one species, to be submitted as the first step in the safety assessment of FSs. With this article, we echo requests that have been made for xenobiotics by the pharmaceutical industry worldwide, extending them to food-related products, especially FSs. We encourage regulatory agencies to adopt globally harmonized safety assessment procedures, regulatory guidelines, and review practices for FSs to foster global trade and to reduce costs and laboratory animal use.
© 2013 by The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  90-day rat study; flavoring substances; international harmonization; regulatory safety assessment.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23881932     DOI: 10.1177/0192623313495603

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Pathol        ISSN: 0192-6233            Impact factor:   1.902


  3 in total

1.  Assessment of Grape, Plum and Orange Synthetic Food Flavourings Using in vivo Acute Toxicity Tests.

Authors:  Ila Monize Sousa Sales; Janaína Sousa Barbosa; Fabelina Karollyne Silva Dos Santos; Felipe Cavalcanti Carneiro da Silva; Paulo Michel Pinheiro Ferreira; João Marcelo de Castro E Sousa; Ana Paula Peron
Journal:  Food Technol Biotechnol       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 3.918

Review 2.  Role of pathology peer review in interpretation of the comet assay.

Authors:  Robert R Maronpot; Cheryl A Hobbs; Shim-Mo Hayashi
Journal:  J Toxicol Pathol       Date:  2018-05-11       Impact factor: 1.628

3.  In vivo and in vitro mutagenicity of perillaldehyde and cinnamaldehyde.

Authors:  Masamitsu Honma; Masami Yamada; Manabu Yasui; Katsuyoshi Horibata; Kei-Ichi Sugiyama; Kenichi Masumura
Journal:  Genes Environ       Date:  2021-07-16
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.