Literature DB >> 23881896

Imaging at London 2012 summer Olympic Games: analysis of demand and distribution of workload.

Sarath Bethapudi1, Richard Budgett, Lars Engebretsen, Philip O'Connor.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Very little data on the provision of imaging services at the summer Olympic Games have been published before. With 7.9 million Euros (£6.6 million, US$11 million) invested into setting up the imaging equipment at the purpose-built polyclinics for London 2012 summer Olympics, an ideal opportunity was presented to study the demand and distribution of workload on imaging services at the games.
SETTING: Imaging services within polyclinics, London 2012 summer Olympic Games. AIMS: To analyse the demand and distribution of workload on radiology services at the London 2012 summer Olympic Games.
METHODS: Data on radiological investigations performed at London 2012 summer Olympic Games were retrieved from Radiology Information System-picture archiving communication system, ATOS medical encounter database and analysed.
RESULTS: 1711 diagnostic and interventional procedures were performed at the Stratford Polyclinic within the main games village. Of these 48.8% were MRI scans, 20.2% were diagnostic ultrasound examinations, 23.6% were plain radiographs, 2.9% were CT scans and interventional procedures accounted for 4.3%. Nearly 75% of imaging was performed on athletes while less than 5% of the services were utilised by the workforce. Demand on radiology services peaked during week 2 of the games.
CONCLUSIONS: Imaging played a substantial role in providing medical services at the London 2012 summer Olympics.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MRI; Olympics; Post olympic reviews; Sporting injuries; Ultrasound

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23881896     DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2013-092345

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Sports Med        ISSN: 0306-3674            Impact factor:   13.800


  8 in total

Review 1.  Data analysis and review of radiology services at Glasgow 2014 Commonwealth Games.

Authors:  Sarath Bethapudi; David Ritchie; Santosh Bongale; Jonny Gordon; John MacLean; Liz Mendl
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Perspective on imaging services at the London 2012 Olympic and Paralympic Games.

Authors:  Sarath Bethapudi; Robert S D Campbell; Philip O'Connor
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Knee cartilage damage and concomitant internal derangement on MRI in athletes competing at the Rio de Janeiro 2016 Summer Olympics.

Authors:  Zohaib Ahmad; Akira M Murakami; Lars Engebretsen; Mohamed Jarraya; Frank W Roemer; Ali Guermazi; Andrew J Kompel
Journal:  Eur J Radiol Open       Date:  2020-09-11

4.  Advanced Treatment Monitoring for Olympic-Level Athletes Using Unsupervised Modeling Techniques.

Authors:  Jacob A Siedlik; Charles Bergeron; Michael Cooper; Russell Emmons; William Moreau; Dustin Nabhan; Philip Gallagher; John P Vardiman
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 2.860

5.  Evaluation of spine MRIs in athletes participating in the Rio de Janeiro 2016 Summer Olympic Games.

Authors:  Michael S Wasserman; Ali Guermazi; Mohamed Jarraya; Lars Engbretsen; Mohamad AbdelKader; Frank W Roemer; Daichi Hayashi; Michel D Crema; Asim Z Mian
Journal:  BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med       Date:  2018-03-08

6.  Prediction model for utilization of complementary and alternative medicine for sports injuries among Korean elite collegiate athletes.

Authors:  Ye-Seul Lee; Deuk Su Park; Jae Keun Oh; Song-Yi Kim
Journal:  Integr Med Res       Date:  2020-03-06

7.  MRI-Detected Knee Ligament Sprains and Associated Internal Derangement in Athletes Competing at the Rio de Janeiro 2016 Summer Olympics.

Authors:  Frank Roemer; Ali Guermazi; Andrew Kompel; Prashanth H Haran; Akira M Murakami; Lars Engebretsen; Mohamed Jarraya
Journal:  Open Access J Sports Med       Date:  2021-03-08

8.  Imaging-detected bone stress injuries at the Tokyo 2020 summer Olympics: epidemiology, injury onset, and competition withdrawal rate.

Authors:  Takuya Adachi; Hiroki Katagiri; Jae-Sung An; Lars Engebretsen; Ukihide Tateishi; Yukihisa Saida; Hideyuki Koga; Kazuyoshi Yagishita; Kentaro Onishi; Bruce B Forster
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-08-10       Impact factor: 2.562

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.