Literature DB >> 23881804

Risk of gastric or peritoneal recurrence, and long-term outcomes, following pancreatic cancer resection with preoperative endosonographically guided fine needle aspiration.

S Ngamruengphong1, C Xu, T A Woodward, M Raimondo, J A Stauffer, H J Asbun, M B Wallace.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: There have been concerns regarding tumor cell seeding along the needle track or within the peritoneum caused by preoperative endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA). The aim of this study was to evaluate whether preoperative EUS-FNA is associated with increased risk of stomach/peritoneal recurrence and whether the procedure affects long term survival.
METHODS: The records of patients diagnosed with malignant solid and cystic pancreatic neoplasms who underwent surgery with curative intent between 1996 and 2012 were reviewed.
RESULTS: A total of 256 patients with similar baseline characteristics were included: 48 patients in the non-EUS-FNA group and 208 in the EUS-FNA group. Recurrence data were available for 207 patients. Median length of follow-up was 23 months (range 0 - 111 months). A total of 19 patients had gastric or peritoneal recurrence; 6 (15.4 %) in the non-EUS-FNA group vs. 13 (7.7 %) in the EUS-FNA group (P = 0.21). Three patients had recurrence in the stomach wall: one (2.6 %) patient in the non-EUS-FNA group vs. two patients (1.2 %) in EUS-FNA group (P = 0.46). A total of 16 patients had peritoneal recurrence: 5 patients (12.8 %) in the non-EUS-FNA group and 11 patients (6.5 %) in the EUS-FNA group (P = 0.19). In a multivariate analysis, undergoing EUS-FNA was not associated with increased cancer recurrence or decreased overall survival.
CONCLUSION: Pre-operative EUS-FNA was not associated with an increased rate of gastric or peritoneal cancer recurrence in patients with resected pancreatic cancer. Two patients had gastric wall recurrence following the procedure, but this may be explained by direct tumor extension. This suggests that EUS-FNA is not associated with an increased risk of needle track seeding. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23881804     DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1344216

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endoscopy        ISSN: 0013-726X            Impact factor:   10.093


  23 in total

Review 1.  Applications of endoscopic ultrasound in pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Leticia Perondi Luz; Mohammad Ali Al-Haddad; Michael Sai Lai Sey; John M DeWitt
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-06-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  Elastography for the pancreas: Current status and future perspective.

Authors:  Natsuko Kawada; Sachiko Tanaka
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  Comparative effectiveness of biliary brush cytology and intraductal biopsy for detection of malignant biliary strictures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Udayakumar Navaneethan; Basile Njei; Vennisvasanth Lourdusamy; Rajesh Konjeti; John J Vargo; Mansour A Parsi
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 4.  The emerging role of endoscopic ultrasound for pancreaticobiliary diseases in the pediatric population.

Authors:  Suril Patel; Jarred Marshak; Fredric Daum; Shahzad Iqbal
Journal:  World J Pediatr       Date:  2017-04-10       Impact factor: 2.764

5.  Isolated Gastric Metastases of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma following Radical Resection-Impact of Endosonography-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Tract Seeding.

Authors:  Martin Loveček; Pavel Skalický; Ondřej Urban; Jana Tesaříková; Martin Kliment; Róbert Psár; Hana Švébišová; Kateřina Urban; Beatrice Mohelníková-Duchoňová; Dušan Klos; Martin Stašek
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2022-06-12

6.  Resected tumor seeding in stomach wall due to endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine needle aspiration of pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Akiko Tomonari; Akio Katanuma; Tomoaki Matsumori; Hajime Yamazaki; Itsuki Sano; Ryuki Minami; Manabu Sen-yo; Satoshi Ikarashi; Toshifumi Kin; Kei Yane; Kuniyuki Takahashi; Toshiya Shinohara; Hiroyuki Maguchi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Surgical management of biliary malignancy.

Authors:  T Peter Kingham; Victoria G Aveson; Alice C Wei; Jason A Castellanos; Peter J Allen; Daniel P Nussbaum; Yinin Hu; Michael I D'Angelica
Journal:  Curr Probl Surg       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 1.909

8.  Should Contrast-Enhanced Harmonic Endoscopic Ultrasound Be Incorporated into the International Consensus Guidelines to Determine the Appropriate Treatment of Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasm?

Authors:  Tomohiro Yamazaki; Mamoru Takenaka; Shunsuke Omoto; Tomoe Yoshikawa; Rei Ishikawa; Ayana Okamoto; Atsushi Nakai; Kosuke Minaga; Ken Kamata; Kentaro Yamao; Yoriaki Komeda; Tomohiro Watanabe; Naoshi Nishida; Keiko Kamei; Ippei Matsumoto; Yoshifumi Takeyama; Takaaki Chikugo; Yasutaka Chiba; Masatoshi Kudo
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 4.241

9.  Preoperative endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration for diagnosis of pancreatic cancer in potentially resectable patients: Is this safe?

Authors:  Natalie D Cosgrove; Linda Yan; Ali Siddiqui
Journal:  Endosc Ultrasound       Date:  2015 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 5.628

10.  The safety of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of pancreatic cystic lesions.

Authors:  Won Jae Yoon; William R Brugge
Journal:  Endosc Ultrasound       Date:  2015 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 5.628

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.