Literature DB >> 23881730

Health information technology in urologic care: current status and implications for quality of care.

Robert A Dowling1.   

Abstract

Health information technology (HIT) is expected to transform the delivery of health care in the United States, but implementation and adoption vary widely across settings, specialties, and geographies. Significant barriers to high-level adoption persist despite federal incentives to hospitals and health-care providers. This article will review the current status and future impact of HIT in the specialty of urology, with emphasis on the intersection of HIT and quality measurement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23881730     DOI: 10.1007/s11934-013-0356-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Urol Rep        ISSN: 1527-2737            Impact factor:   3.092


  9 in total

1.  Physicians in nonprimary care and small practices and those age 55 and older lag in adopting electronic health record systems.

Authors:  Sandra L Decker; Eric W Jamoom; Jane E Sisk
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 6.301

2.  Most physicians were eligible for federal incentives in 2011, but few had EHR systems that met meaningful-use criteria.

Authors:  Chun-Ju Hsiao; Sandra L Decker; Esther Hing; Jane E Sisk
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 6.301

3.  The "meaningful use" regulation for electronic health records.

Authors:  David Blumenthal; Marilyn Tavenner
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-07-13       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 4.  Systematic review: impact of health information technology on quality, efficiency, and costs of medical care.

Authors:  Basit Chaudhry; Jerome Wang; Shinyi Wu; Margaret Maglione; Walter Mojica; Elizabeth Roth; Sally C Morton; Paul G Shekelle
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2006-04-11       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Cottage industry to postindustrial care--the revolution in health care delivery.

Authors:  Stephen J Swensen; Gregg S Meyer; Eugene C Nelson; Gordon C Hunt; David B Pryor; Jed I Weissberg; Gary S Kaplan; Jennifer Daley; Gary R Yates; Mark R Chassin; Brent C James; Donald M Berwick
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-01-20       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 6.  The benefits of health information technology: a review of the recent literature shows predominantly positive results.

Authors:  Melinda Beeuwkes Buntin; Matthew F Burke; Michael C Hoaglin; David Blumenthal
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 6.301

7.  Physician adoption of electronic health record systems: United States, 2011.

Authors:  Eric Jamoom; Paul Beatty; Anita Bercovitz; David Woodwell; Kathleen Palso; Elizabeth Rechtsteiner
Journal:  NCHS Data Brief       Date:  2012-07

8.  The rise of electronic health record adoption among family physicians.

Authors:  Imam M Xierali; Chun-Ju Hsiao; James C Puffer; Larry A Green; Jason C B Rinaldo; Andrew W Bazemore; Mathew T Burke; Robert L Phillips
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2013 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.166

9.  The relevance of social media and online reviews for urological practice: some questions and some answers.

Authors:  Robert Dowling
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 7.450

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.