| Literature DB >> 23881394 |
Elena V Voznesenskaya1, Nuria K Koteyeva, Hossein Akhani, Eric H Roalson, Gerald E Edwards.
Abstract
In subfamily Salsoloideae (family Chenopodiaceae) most species are C4 plants having terete leaves with Salsoloid Kranz anatomy characterized by a continuous dual chlorenchyma layer of Kranz cells (KCs) and mesophyll (M) cells, surrounding water storage and vascular tissue. From section Coccosalsola sensu Botschantzev, leaf structural and photosynthetic features were analysed on selected species of Salsola which are not performing C4 based on leaf carbon isotope composition. The results infer the following progression in distinct functional and structural forms from C3 to intermediate to C4 photosynthesis with increased leaf succulence without changes in vein density: From species performing C3 photosynthesis with Sympegmoid anatomy with two equivalent layers of elongated M cells, with few organelles in a discontinuous layer of bundle sheath (BS) cells (S. genistoides, S. masenderanica, S. webbii) > development of proto-Kranz BS cells having mitochondria in a centripetal position and increased chloroplast number (S. montana) > functional C3-C4 intermediates having intermediate CO2 compensation points with refixation of photorespired CO2, development of Kranz-like anatomy with reduction in the outer M cell layer to hypodermal-like cells, and increased specialization (but not size) of a Kranz-like inner layer of cells with increased cell wall thickness, organelle number, and selective expression of mitochondrial glycine decarboxylase (Kranz-like Sympegmoid, S. arbusculiformis; and Kranz-like Salsoloid, S. divaricata) > selective expression of enzymes between the two cell types for performing C4 with Salsoloid-type anatomy. Phylogenetic analysis of tribe Salsoleae shows the occurrence of C3 and intermediates in several clades, and lineages of interest for studying different forms of anatomy.Entities:
Keywords: C3 plants; C3–C4 intermediate; C4 plants; Chenopodiaceae; Salsola divaricata; Salsola genistoides; Salsola masenderanica; Salsola montana; Salsola webbii.; immunolocalization; leaf anatomy; photosynthetic enzymes
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23881394 PMCID: PMC3745723 DOI: 10.1093/jxb/ert191
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Exp Bot ISSN: 0022-0957 Impact factor: 6.992
Fig. 1.General views of growth chamber-grown plants (A, D, G, J, M) and their branches (B, E, H, K, N), and the fruiting branches from natural habitats (C, F, I, L, O) of five Salsoleae species formerly classified under Salsola section Coccosalsola. Salsola genistoides (A–C), S. masenderanica (D–F), S. montana (G–I), S. webbii (J–L), and S. divaricata (M–O). C, from Herbario virtual de la Universidad de Alicante: http://www.herbariovirtual.ua.es/hoja_salsola_genistoides.htm with permission, accessed 2 April 2013; F, I, O, by HA; L, from AlmeriNatura: http://www.almerinatura.com/, accessed 2 April 2013 with permission. Scale bars=1cm.
Fig. 2.Autofluorescence of leaf tissues (A–D), general anatomy (E–H), and starch localization (I–L) in leaves of four Salsoleae species of formerly Salsola section Coccosalsola. Salsola masenderanica (A, E, I), S. montana (B, F, J), S. webbii (C, G, K), and S. divaricata (D, H, L). (A–D) Autofluorescence of leaf cross-sections. (E–H) Light microscopy on leaf cross-sections showing the position of palisade mesophyll (M) and bundle sheath (BS) or Kranz-like cells (KLC). Note the continuous inner layer of KLCs in S. divaricata and the difference between outer (M1) and inner (M2) layers of mesophyll. (I–L) PAS (periodic acid–Schiff’s) staining for carbohydrates; arrowheads point to starch grains. MV, main vein; VB, vascular bundles; WS, water storage tissue. Scale bars=200 μm for A–D, G; 100 μm for E, F, H; 50 μm for I–L.
Fig. 3.Illustration of the venation pattern and leaf vein density on cleared leaves of three Salsoleae species of formerly Salsola section Coccosalsola, Salsola masenderanica (A), S. montana (B), S. divaricata (C), and the C4 Salsoloid-type species Caroxylon orientale (D). Observation of cleared leaves under UV light shows a low branching pattern with few terminal ends and low density of the veins in three species, S. masenderanica (A), S. divaricata (C), and C. orientale (D), and a higher density of branched veins in S. montana (B). Scale bars=200 μm.
Vein density in representative Salsola s.l. species
| Species | Vein density (mm/mm2) |
|---|---|
| 10.0±0.5 | |
| 15.0±0.5 | |
| 12.5±0.6 | |
| 10.3±0.4 | |
| 9.2±0.8 | |
| 15.0±0.5 |
Fig. 4.Electron microscopy of mesophyll (M) versus bundle sheath (BS) and Kranz-like cells (KLCs) in leaves of four Salsoleae species of formerly Salsola section Coccosalsola: S. masenderanica (A–D), S. montana (E–H), S. webbii (I–L), and S. divaricata (M–P). (A, E, I, M) Micrographs show M and BS/KLCs around vascular bundles. (B, F, J, N, O) Organelles in BS and KLCs at a higher magnification. Note the difference in abundance of organelles in BS and KLCs between species, and the numerous mitochondria in KLCs of S. divaricata (N, O). (C, G, K, O) Chloroplast structure in BS and KCLs of the four species. (D, H, L, P) Structure of M chloroplasts in the four species. Ch, chloroplast; Mb, microbody; Mt, mitochondria; VB, vascular bundle. Scale bars=10 μm for A, E, I, M; 1 μm for B, C, F, J; 0.5 μm for D, G, H, K, L, O, P; and 2 μm for N.
Mitochondrial size (small diameter) in representative Salsola s.l. species
| Species | Mitochondrial size (μm) | |
|---|---|---|
| BS, KLC, or KC | M | |
| 0.45±0.02 | 0.40±0.02 | |
| 0.32±0.03 | 0.36±0.02 | |
| 0.44±0.01 | 0.43±0.03 | |
| 0.38±0.02 | 0.51±0.02 | |
| 0.62±0.02 | 0.38±0.03 | |
| 0.65±0.04 | 0.32±0.02 | |
| 0.39±0.04 | 0.47±0.01 | |
BS, bundle sheath cells around veins; KCL/KC, inner layer of Kranz-like or Kranz cells, M, mesophyll cells.
Thickness of cell walls in leaf cross-sections of representative Salsola s.l. species
| Species | A. Thickness of individual cell walls towards the IS (μm) | B. Combined thickness of adjacent cell walls (μm) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BS, KLC, KC | M1 | M2 | BS, KLC or KC in contact with other cells | |||
| Towards M IS | Towards IS | Towards IS | M | BS, KLC, KC | WS | |
| 0.20±0.005 | 0.16±0.003 | 0.12±0.004 | 0.21±0.011 | 0.26±0.008 | 0.36±0.017 | |
| 0.19±0.007 | 0.13±0.003 | 0.11±0.003 | 0.22±0.002 | 0.20±0.02 | 0.13±0.03 | |
| 0.11±0.01 | 0.11±0.005 | 0.11±0.003 | 0.24±0.011 | 0.25±0.01 | 0.19±0.02 | |
| 0.17±0.004 | 0.12±0.004 | 0.10±0.002 | 0.29±0.008 | 0.29±0.012 | 0.14±0.004 | |
| 0.31±0.01 | 0.20±0.01 | 0.07±0.002 | 0.29±0.013 | 0.24±0.02 | 0.73±0.02 | |
| 2.9±0.22 | 0.18±0.01 | 0.11±0.004 | 2.42±0.12 | 0.97±0.03 | 1.52±0.12 | |
BS, bundle sheath cells surrounding veins; KC, KLC, internal layer of Kranz or Kranz-like cells; IS, intercellular air space; M, mesophyll cell; WS, water storage cell.
In each case n=15–30 measurements. Values are shown with standard errors.
For X. richteri, this layer represents specialized hypoderm.
For X. richteri, this layer could be also referred as M.
(A) Thickness of individual cell walls of BS, KLC, or KC, M1 (or hypodermal cells in Xylosalsola richteri and hypodermal-like in S. divaricata), or M2 cells when in contact with intercellular air space. (B) Combined thickness of cell walls where BS cells, KLCs, or KCs are in contact with other cells (M, WS, or an adjacent BS, KLC or KC).
Fig. 5.Western blots for C4 enzymes and Rubisco from soluble proteins extracted from leaves of five Salsola species s.l., Salsola genistoides, S. masenderanica, S. montana, S. webbii, and S. divaricata, and two C4 Salsoloid-type species, Caroxylon orientale and Xylosalsola richteri. Blots were probed with antibodies raised against PEPC, PPDK, NAD-ME, NADP-ME, and Rubisco large subunit, respectively. Numbers on the left indicate the molecular mass in kiloDaltons.
Carbon isotope composition of leaf biomass (δ C) and CO compensation point (Г) at 25 °C and 920 PPFD in representative Salsola s.l. species
Average numbers of several measurements are presented; for δ13C individual numbers and sources, see Table 5.
| Species | Carbon isotope composition (δ13C) | CO2 compensation point (Г, ppm) |
|---|---|---|
| –29.7±1.00 | 46.3±0.2 ( | |
| –23.6±0.06 | 74.9±1.8 ( | |
| –22.6±0.03 | 52.8±6.1 ( | |
| –24.5±0.10 | 49.7±0.1 ( | |
| –29.2±0.17 | 32.3±2.9 ( | |
| –13.5±0.46 | 5.5±1.5 ( | |
| –12.1±0.04 | 5.8±0.9 ( |
Data on carbon isotope composition and leaf anatomy of species formerly classified under Salsola section Coccosalsola
Some species are placed in the informal clade ‘Oreosalsola’ based on morphological features (HA, unpublished); additional analysis by molecular phylogeny is needed.
| Species | Source | δ13C leaf | Reference | Leaf structure | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| LE | –24.5 | Pyankov et al. (2001 | Kranz-like Sals | This study | |
| WSU | –28.9, –29.7 | This study | |||
| Canary Islands, Tenerife, H. Freitag 10.319 (KAS) | –25.7, –25.5 | This study | |||
|
| |||||
| Iran | –24.0 | Akhani et al. (1997) | Symp | Butnik | |
| Uzbekistan | –21.2, 26.8 | Pyankov et al. (1997) | Symp | Pyankov et al., (1997) | |
| LE | –23.9 | Pyankov et al. (2001 | Symp | Pyankov et al. (2001 | |
| Iran | –24.0, –28.9 | Akhani and Ghasemkhani (2007) | C3–C4 | Voznesenskaya et al. (2001) | |
| Kranz-like Symp | This study | ||||
| LE | –23.1 | Pyankov et al. (2001 | C3–C4 Symp | Wen and Zhang (2011) | |
| China | –22.1 | Wen and Zhang (2011) | Kranz-like Sals | This study | |
| Kazakstan, S. Lipschitz, 7.09.1928 (MW) | –20.6 | This study | |||
| Kazakstan, I.A. Gubanov, 30.07.1959 (MW) | –25.3 | This study | |||
|
| |||||
| LE | –24.9 | Pyankov et al. (2001 | Symp | Pyankov et al. (2001 | |
| China, T.N. Ho | –24.7, –24.5 | This study | |||
| Mongolia, V.I. Grubov | –24.0, –23.6 | This study | |||
| LE | –22.7 | C.C. Black, personal communication | |||
| LE | –24.4 | Pyankov et al. (2001 | Kranz-like Sals | This study | |
| Kirgizia, V.B. Kuvaev,#153, 4.09.1960. Det. A. Elenevskii (MW) | –26.1 | This study | |||
| Kirgizia, V. Botschantzev, #335, 26.07.1974 (LE) | –23.3, –23.5 | This study | |||
| SW Morocco, H. Freitag, 35.019 (KAS) | –27.8, –27.8 | This study | |||
| Marocco, R. Maire, 31.03.1937 (LE) | –25.3, –25.1 | This study | |||
| China, A.A. Junatov, J.Ifen, 143.7 Ju, 31.07.1968 (LE) | –21.1, –21.9 | This study | |||
| S. Uzbekistan, V. Botschanzev, 26, 9.06.1971 (LE) | –24.0 | This study | |||
| LE | –22.2 | Pyankov et al. (2001 | Symp | This study | |
| WSU | –23.5, –23.6 | This study | |||
| Iran | –25.74 | Akhani et al., (1997) | Symp | Butnik, (1984) | |
| Uzbekistan | –27.2, –26.8, –28.4 | Pyankov et al. (1997) | Symp | Pyankov et al. (2001 | |
| LE | –22.8 | Pyankov et al. (2001 | Proto-Kranz | This study | |
| Iran | –26.3 | Akhani and Ghasemkhani (2007) | |||
| WSU | -22.5, 22.6 | This study | |||
| West Pamirs, Vanch River | –27.2 | Pyankov et al. (1997) | Symp | Pyankov et al. (1997) | |
| Pamirs Moutain, Badachshan region, K. Stanyukovitsch | –21.5, –21.9 | This study | |||
| Uzbekistan | –24.6 | Pyankov et al. (1997, 2001 | Symp | (Butnik (1984) | |
| LE | –20.4 | Pyankov et al. (2001 | |||
|
| |||||
| Libya, Agedabia, U. Pratov, 10 October 1978 (LE) | –10.5, –10.3 | This study | |||
| Libya, Cirenaica, Wadi Derna S. Brullo & Furnari 16.09.1974 (KAS) | –14.4, –13.8 | This study | |||
| S Turkey, Antalya Prov., H. Duman, no. 6838, 08.08.1998 (KAS) | –15.9, –15.6 | This study | |||
| Iran, H. Akhani 6727 | –12.14 | Akhani et al. (1997) | Sals (+H) | This study | |
| Pakistan, Baluchistan, H. Freitag, no. 18535, 01.10.1986 (KAS) | –13.2, –14.0 | This study | Sals (–H) | Butnik (1976) | |
| Turkmenistan | –12.0 | Akhani et al. (1997) | |||
| LE | –11.4 | Pyankov et al. (2001 | |||
| Iran | –12.9 | Akhani et al. (1997) | |||
| LE | –11.1 | Pyankov et al. (2001 | |||
| – | –14.7 | Winter (1981) | Sals (+H) | Carolin et al. (1975) | |
| LE | –12.4 | Pyankov et al. (2001 | |||
| Pakistan, Baluchistan, H. Freitag, no.18.587, 05.10.1986 (KAS) | –11.1, –11.3 | This study | |||
| Malta, Gozo, M. Appelhans 02.08.2007 (KAS) | –6.9, –7.1 | This study | |||
| – | –13.2 | Winter (1981) | |||
| Spain | –11.14 | Akhani et al. (1997) | |||
| LE | –12.5 | Pyankov et al. (2001 | |||
| Espagne, E. Evrard, 11.57, 25.05.1991 (MO) | –13.0, –12.6 | This study | |||
| Algeria, A. Dubuis, 12079, 27.07.1985 (MO) | –14.6 | This study | |||
| Morocco, S. Castroviejo, J. Fdez. Casas, F. Munoz Garmendia, A. Susanna, FC5174, 27.05.1981 (under the name | –11.3, –12.4 | This study | Sals | This study | |
| Spain, Mallorca, 4.6.1987 (under the name | –11.7, –12.1 | This study | |||
| S. Spain, Almeria, M. Costa, No. 12973, 4.11.1984 (#P05344398, P) | –11.4, –11.1 | This study | |||
| – | –12.9 | Winter (1981) | |||
| Palestine | –14.1 | Akhani et al. (1997) | |||
| LE | –12.0 | Pyankov et al. (2001 | |||
| Morocco, Prov. de Safi, D. Podlech, 44954, 23.4.1989 (#P05267738, P) | –11.2, –11.2 | This study | |||
| – | –13.0 | Winter (1981) | |||
| Algeria | –10.2 | Akhani et al. (1997) | |||
| LE | –11.7 | Pyankov et al. (2001 | |||
|
| |||||
| Uzbekistan, Mongolia | –13.0, –12.9 | Pyankov et al. (1997) | Sals (+H) | Rojanovskii (1970) | |
| Iran | –12.4 | Akhani et al. (1997 | Sals (+H) | Voznesenskaya et al., (2001) | |
| Sals (+H) | Butnik | ||||
| LE | –12.4 | Pyankov et al. (2001 | |||
| Kazakstan, A. Yunatov, L. Kuznezov, 24.07.1956 (LE) | –11.4, –11.6 | This study | Sals | Butnik (1984) | |
| – | –12.9 | Winter (1981) | Sals (+H) | Carolin et al. (1975) | |
| WSU | –13.3, –13.2 | This study | Sals (+H) | Butnik (1984) | |
| Sals (+H) | Butnik | ||||
| – | –11.9 | Winter (1981) | Sals (+H) | Carolin et al. (1975) | |
| Iran | –12.9 | Akhani et al. (1997) | Sals (+H) | Voznesenskaya (1976) | |
| Uzbekistan | –12.9, –12.0 | Pyankov et al. (1997) | Sals (+H) | Pyankov et al. (2001 | |
| Uzbekistan | –13.6 | This study | Sals (+H) | Pyankov et al. (2000) | |
| Uzbekistan | –12.9, –13.0 | Pyankov et al. (2000) | Sals (+H) | Butnik | |
| –12.9 | Pyankov et al. (2001 | ||||
| LE | –11.2 | Pyankov et al. (2001 | |||
|
| |||||
| W Morocco, H. Freitag, 35.002 (KAS) | –26.2, –27.0 | This study | |||
| Morocco, Agadir, H. Humbert, July 1925 (LE) | –24.6, –23.7 | This study | |||
| Spain | –26.9 | Akhani et al. (1997) | Sals | Carolin et al. (1975) | |
| LE | –25.0 | Pyankov et al. (2001 | Symp | Voznesenskaya (1976) | |
| WSU | –30.7, –28.7 | This study | Symp | This study | |
| Morocco | –26.9 | Winter (1981) | Symp | Carolin et al. (1975) | |
| Iran | –26.8 | Akhani et al. (1997) | Symp | Pyankov et al. (2001 | |
| LE |
| Pyankov et al. (2001 | Symp | This study | |
| WSU | –24.6, –24.4 | This study | |||
KAS, University of Kassel, Germany; LE, Herbarium of the Komarov Botanical Institute, Saint-Petersburg, Russia; MO, Herbarium of the Missouri Botanical Garden, St Louis, MO, USA; MW, Herbarium of the Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia; P, Herbarium of the Museum national d’Histoire naturelle, Paris, France; WSU, grown at the Washington State University, voucher specimen available at the WSU Marion Ownbey Herbarium, Pullman, WA, USA; Symp, Sympegmoid-type anatomy; Kranz-like Symp; Kranz-like Sympegmoid anatomy; Kranz-like Sals, Kranz-like Salsoloid anatomy; Sals, Salsoloid; +H, hypoderm is present; –H, hypoderm is absent.
Information when available includes a listing of the herbarium, collector, specimen number, date, and country of origin.
Salsola euryphylla Botsch. and S. transhyrcanica are presumed to belong to the Xylosalsola clade, but have not been included in any phylogenetic analyses and do not have a combination as of yet in Xylosalsola.
Fig. 6.Rates of CO2 fixation in response to varying light intensity (A) and intercellular levels of CO2 (B) in three Salsola species s.l., S. masenderanica, S. montana, and S. divaricata, and two C4 Salsoloid-type species, Caroxylon orientale and Xylosalsola richteri. The results show the average from measurements of the response to changes in light (from high to low), and CO2 (from ambient to low, and low to high), from 2–4 separate measurements on branches from different plants.
Fig. 7.Graphs showing quantitative data obtained from electron microscopy of in situ immunolocalization of glycine decarboxylase (GDC) in mesophyll (M) versus bundle sheath (BS) of Salsola species s.l., S. masenderanica, S. montana, and S. webbii, M versus Kranz-like cells (KLCs) of S. divaricata in section Coccosalsola, and M versus Kranz cells (KCs) in the C4 Salsoloid-type species Caroxylon orientale. The density of labelling (number of gold particles per μm2 of mitochondrial area) for GDC in mitochondria in the chlorenchyma cell types is shown. For each cell type, 10–15 cell fragments were used for counting.
Fig. 8.Maximum likelihood phylogram of relationships in tribes Salsoleae and Caroxyloneae. Numbers at nodes reflect bootstrap percentages >50%. Genera are abbreviated as: A., Anabasis; C., Climacoptera; Ca., Caroxylon; Co., Cornulaca; Cy., Cyatobasis; G.; Girgensohnia; H.; Halothamnus; Halo., Halogeton; Halox., Haloxylon; Ham., Hammada; Ho., Horaninowia; I., Iljinia; K., Kaviria; N., Noaea; O., Ofaiston; Pe., Petrosimonia; R., Rhaphidophyton; S., Salsola; Sy., Sympegma; T., Turania; Tr., Traganum; X., Xylosalsola. The colour coding shows species from section ‘Coccosalsola’ plus S. touranica, Sy. regelii, and R. regelii. The species boxed in blue are known C3–C4 intermediates in tribe Salsoleae. The species boxed in yellow have non-Kranz-type leaf anatomy and/or C3-type carbon isotope composition (including S. webbii, S. genistoides, S. montana, and S. masenderanica in the present study; S. laricifolia putative intermediate based on structure but not functionally tested). The species boxed in pink are C4 species from concept section Coccosalsola. The remaining species are C4.
Summary of known types of photosynthesis in species of formerly Salsola section Coccosalsola (including S. botschantzevii and species added in Botchantzev, 1989)
| Informal genera | ||
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
|
| ||
| ‘ | ||
|
| ||
A, anatomy; CI, carbon isotope composition; P, physiology.
Salsola euryphylla Botsch. and S. transhyrcanica are presumed to belong to the Xylosalsola clade, but have not been included in any phylogenetic analyses and do not have a combination as of yet in Xylosalsola.
Fig. 9.A model illustrating five conceptual phases of evolution of C4 Salsoloid-type anatomy, having a single compound Kranz unit, from C3 Sympegmoid-type anatomy. Similar events might take place during reversions from C4. Additional abbreviations: F, functional type; cp, centripetal, indicating positioning of organelles towards the inner BS, KLC, KC wall; mito, mitochondria. Colours: chloroplasts (green, dark green in KC in C4), mitochondria (orange with GDC; dark brown without GDC).