PURPOSE: To characterize, directly and for the first time, the membrane transport and metabolism of pralatrexate, a new-generation dihydrofolate reductase inhibitor approved for the treatment for peripheral T-cell lymphoma. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: [(3)H]pralatrexate transport was studied in unique HeLa cell lines that express either the reduced folate carrier (RFC) or the proton-coupled folate transporter (PCFT). Metabolism to active polyglutamate derivatives was assessed by liquid chromatography. These properties were compared to those of methotrexate (MTX). RESULTS: The pralatrexate influx K t, mediated by RFC, the major route of folate/antifolate transport at systemic pH, was 0.52 μΜ, 1/10th the MTX influx K i. The electrochemical potential of pralatrexate within HeLa cells far exceeded the extracellular level and was greater than for MTX. In contrast, MTX transport mediated by PCFT, the mechanism of folate/antifolate absorption in the small intestine, exceeded that for pralatrexate. After a 6 h exposure of HeLa cells to 0.5 μM pralatrexate, 80 % of intracellular drug was its active polyglutamate forms, predominantly the tetraglutamate, and was suppressed when cells were loaded with natural folates. There was negligible formation of MTX polyglutamates. The difference in pralatrexate and MTX growth inhibition was far greater after transient exposures (375-fold) than continuous exposure (25-fold) to the drugs. CONCLUSIONS: Pralatrexate's enhanced activity relative to MTX is due to its much more rapid rate of transport and polyglutamation, the former less important when the carrier is saturated. The low affinity of pralatrexate for PCFT predicts a lower level of enterohepatic circulation and increased fecal excretion of the drug relative to MTX.
PURPOSE: To characterize, directly and for the first time, the membrane transport and metabolism of pralatrexate, a new-generation dihydrofolate reductase inhibitor approved for the treatment for peripheral T-cell lymphoma. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN:[(3)H]pralatrexate transport was studied in unique HeLa cell lines that express either the reduced folate carrier (RFC) or the proton-coupled folate transporter (PCFT). Metabolism to active polyglutamate derivatives was assessed by liquid chromatography. These properties were compared to those of methotrexate (MTX). RESULTS: The pralatrexate influx K t, mediated by RFC, the major route of folate/antifolate transport at systemic pH, was 0.52 μΜ, 1/10th the MTX influx K i. The electrochemical potential of pralatrexate within HeLa cells far exceeded the extracellular level and was greater than for MTX. In contrast, MTX transport mediated by PCFT, the mechanism of folate/antifolate absorption in the small intestine, exceeded that for pralatrexate. After a 6 h exposure of HeLa cells to 0.5 μM pralatrexate, 80 % of intracellular drug was its active polyglutamate forms, predominantly the tetraglutamate, and was suppressed when cells were loaded with natural folates. There was negligible formation of MTX polyglutamates. The difference in pralatrexate and MTX growth inhibition was far greater after transient exposures (375-fold) than continuous exposure (25-fold) to the drugs. CONCLUSIONS:Pralatrexate's enhanced activity relative to MTX is due to its much more rapid rate of transport and polyglutamation, the former less important when the carrier is saturated. The low affinity of pralatrexate for PCFT predicts a lower level of enterohepatic circulation and increased fecal excretion of the drug relative to MTX.
Authors: Laura B Ramsey; John C Panetta; Colton Smith; Wenjian Yang; Yiping Fan; Naomi J Winick; Paul L Martin; Cheng Cheng; Meenakshi Devidas; Ching-Hon Pui; William E Evans; Stephen P Hunger; Mignon Loh; Mary V Relling Journal: Blood Date: 2012-12-11 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Owen A O'Connor; Barbara Pro; Lauren Pinter-Brown; Nancy Bartlett; Leslie Popplewell; Bertrand Coiffier; Mary Jo Lechowicz; Kerry J Savage; Andrei R Shustov; Christian Gisselbrecht; Eric Jacobsen; Pier Luigi Zinzani; Richard Furman; Andre Goy; Corinne Haioun; Michael Crump; Jasmine M Zain; Eric Hsi; Adam Boyd; Steven Horwitz Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2011-01-18 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Lisa R Treviño; Noriko Shimasaki; Wenjian Yang; John C Panetta; Cheng Cheng; Deqing Pei; Diana Chan; Alex Sparreboom; Kathleen M Giacomini; Ching-Hon Pui; William E Evans; Mary V Relling Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-11-09 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Cristina Kinahan; Michael A Mangone; Luigi Scotto; Michele Visentin; Enrica Marchi; Hearn Jay Cho; Owen A O'Connor Journal: Oncotarget Date: 2020-05-05
Authors: Philip M Tedeschi; Yamini K Kathari; Nadine Johnson-Farley; Joseph R Bertino Journal: Cancer Chemother Pharmacol Date: 2015-04-28 Impact factor: 3.333
Authors: Philip M Tedeschi; Yamini K Kathari; Iqra N Farooqi; Joseph R Bertino Journal: Cancer Chemother Pharmacol Date: 2014-09-09 Impact factor: 3.333