Literature DB >> 2388106

An approach for time-dependent bone modeling and remodeling-application: a preliminary remodeling simulation.

G S Beaupré1, T E Orr, D R Carter.   

Abstract

In a companion paper, we presented a time-dependent theory for bone modeling and remodeling in response to a daily loading history. This paper represents a preliminary attempt to use the theory to determine the distribution of bone density within the adult proximal femur under an assumed normal loading history. Subsequent functional adaptation of the internal structure due to changes in the loading history are then determined. Throughout this preliminary study, the external geometry of the proximal femur is considered to be fixed, i.e., changes in the external shape are neither stimulated nor allowed. Linear and trilinear (dead-zone nonlinearity) rate remodeling laws were compared. Computer emulations using two-dimensional finite element models were successful in creating a normal-appearing distribution of bone tissue when remodeling was initiated from a solid structure of homogeneous bone density. Subsequent reduction in the loading history caused regional bone atrophy. Reinstatement of the normal loading history caused a generalized increase in bone mass but resulted in a slightly different bone distribution than was calculated for a constant loading history. These results demonstrate the utility of the remodeling theory and are consistent with the hypothesis that similar stress-related phenomena are responsible for both normal morphogenesis and functional adaptation in response to changes in the bone loading.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2388106     DOI: 10.1002/jor.1100080507

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  32 in total

1.  Simulation of orthodontic tooth movements. A comparison of numerical models.

Authors:  C Bourauel; D Freudenreich; D Vollmer; D Kobe; D Drescher; A Jäger
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  Computational simulations of stress shielding and bone resorption around existing and computer-designed orthopaedic screws.

Authors:  A Gefen
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Anatomical and biomechanical investigations of the iliotibial tract.

Authors:  K Birnbaum; C H Siebert; T Pandorf; E Schopphoff; A Prescher; F U Niethard
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.246

4.  Porosity of human mandibular condylar bone.

Authors:  G A P Renders; L Mulder; L J van Ruijven; T M G J van Eijden
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.610

5.  Cancellous bone and theropod dinosaur locomotion. Part I-an examination of cancellous bone architecture in the hindlimb bones of theropods.

Authors:  Peter J Bishop; Scott A Hocknull; Christofer J Clemente; John R Hutchinson; Andrew A Farke; Belinda R Beck; Rod S Barrett; David G Lloyd
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 2.984

6.  3D finite element non linear analysis on the stress state at bone-implant interface in dental osteointegrated implants.

Authors:  G Sannino; G Marra; L Feo; A Barlattani
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2011-01-13

7.  The remodeling of alveolar bone supporting the mandibular first molar with different levels of periodontal attachment.

Authors:  Yanfang Zhao; Weifeng Wang; Haitao Xin; Shunlai Zang; Zhiyuan Zhang; Yulu Wu
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2013-04-27       Impact factor: 2.602

8.  Thickness of the subchondral mineralised tissue zone (SMZ) in normal male and female and pathological human patellae.

Authors:  F Eckstein; S Milz; H Anetzberger; R Putz
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 2.610

9.  Theoretical analysis of alendronate and risedronate effects on canine vertebral remodeling and microdamage.

Authors:  Xiang Wang; Antonia M Erickson; Matthew R Allen; David B Burr; R Bruce Martin; Scott J Hazelwood
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2009-03-12       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 10.  Safety factors in bone strength.

Authors:  A A Biewener
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.333

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.