| Literature DB >> 23880793 |
María del Mar Fernández-Arjona1, Elena Bañares-España, María Jesús García-Sánchez, Miguel Hernández-López, Victoria López-Rodas, Eduardo Costas, Antonio Flores-Moya.
Abstract
Los Baños de Vilo (S Spain) is a natural spa characterized by extreme sulphureous waters; however, populations of chlorophyceans inhabit in the spa. The adaptation mechanisms allowing resistance by photosynthetic microorganisms to the extreme sulphureous waters were studied by using a modified Luria-Delbrück fluctuation analysis. For this purpose, the adaptation of the chlorophycean Dictyosphaerium chlorelloides and the cyanobacterium Microcystis aeruginosa (both isolated from non-sulphureous water) were analysed in order to distinguish between physiological adaptation (acclimation) and genetic adaptation by the selection of rare spontaneous mutations. Acclimation to the extreme water was achieved by D. chlorelloides; however, M. aeruginosa cells proliferated as a consequence of selection of favoured mutants (i.e. genetic adaptation). The resistant cells of M. aeruginosa appeared with a frequency of 7.1 × 10(-7) per cell per generation, and the frequency of the resistant allele, under non-selective conditions, was estimated to be 1.1 × 10(-6) per cells as a consequence of the balance mutation-selection. It could be hypothesized that the populations of eukaryotic algae living in the Los Baños de Vilo could be the descendants of chlorophyceans that arrived fortuitously at the spa in the past. On the other hand, cyanobacteria could quickly adapt by the selection of favoured mutants. The single mutation that allows resistance to sulphureous water from Baños de Vilo in M. aeruginosa represents a phenotypic burden impairing growth rate and photosynthetic performance. The resistant-variant cells of M. aeruginosa showed a lower acclimated growth rate and a decreased maximum quantum yield and photosynthetic efficiency, in comparison to the wild-type cells.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23880793 DOI: 10.1007/s00248-013-0268-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microb Ecol ISSN: 0095-3628 Impact factor: 4.552