Literature DB >> 23880594

Avoidance of weight gain is important for oral type 2 diabetes treatments in Sweden and Germany: patient preferences.

A F Mohamed1, J Zhang, F R Johnson, I Duprat Lomon, E Malvolti, R Townsend, C J Ostgren, K G Parhofer.   

Abstract

AIMS: The aim of the study was to quantify patient preferences for outcomes associated with oral antidiabetic medications (OAMs) in Sweden and Germany through a discrete-choice experiment.
METHODS: Adults taking OAMs who had a self-reported physician's diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) made a series of nine choices between pairs of hypothetical profiles. Each profile had a predefined range of attributes: blood glucose control, frequency of mild-to-moderate hypoglycaemia, annual severe hypoglycaemic events, annual weight gain, pill burden and frequency of administration, and cost. Choice questions were based on an experimental design with known statistical properties. Bivariate probit analysis estimated the probabilities of choice of medication administration from patient characteristics and, conditional on that choice, preferences for treatment outcomes.
RESULTS: The final sample consisted of 188 Swedish and 195 German patients. For both countries, weight gain was the most important attribute, followed by blood glucose control. Avoiding a 5-kg weight gain was 1.5 times more important in Sweden and 2.3 times more important in Germany than achieving moderate blood glucose control, thereby, suggesting that blood glucose control is relatively more important to Swedish than to German patients. Least important outcomes were the number of daily pills (Sweden) and frequency of mild-to-moderate hypoglycaemia (Germany).
CONCLUSION: Patients in both Sweden and Germany preferred OAMs not associated with weight gain.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Analyse conjointe; Choice-format conjoint analysis; Discrete-choice experiment; Oral antidiabetic medication; Patient preferences; Préférences des patients; Traitements antidiabétiques oraux

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23880594     DOI: 10.1016/j.diabet.2013.06.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Metab        ISSN: 1262-3636            Impact factor:   6.041


  19 in total

Review 1.  A descriptive review on methods to prioritize outcomes in a health care context.

Authors:  Inger M Janssen; Ansgar Gerhardus; Milly A Schröer-Günther; Fülöp Scheibler
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2014-08-25       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  Discrete Choice Experiment Attribute Selection Using a Multinational Interview Study: Treatment Features Important to Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.

Authors:  Anna Rydén; Stephanie Chen; Emuella Flood; Beverly Romero; Susan Grandy
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 3.883

3.  What matters in type 2 diabetes mellitus oral treatment? A discrete choice experiment to evaluate patient preferences.

Authors:  Axel Mühlbacher; Susanne Bethge
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2015-12-18

4.  Patient preferences for the treatment of type 2 diabetes in Australia: a discrete choice experiment.

Authors:  Akram Ahmad; Muhammad Umair Khan; Parisa Aslani
Journal:  J Diabetes Metab Disord       Date:  2022-01-27

5.  Alignment between outcomes and minimal clinically important differences in the Dutch type 2 diabetes mellitus guideline and healthcare professionals' preferences.

Authors:  Marloes Dankers; Marjorie H J M G Nelissen-Vrancken; Bertien H Hart; Anke C Lambooij; Liset van Dijk; Aukje K Mantel-Teeuwisse
Journal:  Pharmacol Res Perspect       Date:  2021-05

Review 6.  Once-weekly albiglutide in the management of type 2 diabetes: patient considerations.

Authors:  Heather N Woodward; Sarah L Anderson
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2014-05-29       Impact factor: 2.711

Review 7.  Patient and physician preferences for type 2 diabetes medications: a systematic review.

Authors:  Mahdi Toroski; Abbas Kebriaeezadeh; Alireza Esteghamati; Ali Kazemi Karyani; Hadi Abbasian; Shekoufeh Nikfar
Journal:  J Diabetes Metab Disord       Date:  2019-11-11

8.  Evaluating preferences for profiles of GLP-1 receptor agonists among injection-naïve type 2 diabetes patients in the UK.

Authors:  Heather L Gelhorn; Jiat-Ling Poon; Evan W Davies; Rosirene Paczkowski; Sarah E Curtis; Kristina S Boye
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2015-11-09       Impact factor: 2.711

Review 9.  Preference for pharmaceutical formulation and treatment process attributes.

Authors:  Katie D Stewart; Joseph A Johnston; Louis S Matza; Sarah E Curtis; Henry A Havel; Stephanie A Sweetana; Heather L Gelhorn
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 2.711

10.  Patients' and physicians' preferences for type 2 diabetes mellitus treatments in Spain and Portugal: a discrete choice experiment.

Authors:  Carlos Morillas; Rosa Feliciano; Pablo Fernández Catalina; Carla Ponte; Marta Botella; João Rodrigues; Enric Esmatjes; Javier Lafita; Luis Lizán; Ignacio Llorente; Cristóbal Morales; Jorge Navarro-Pérez; Domingo Orozco-Beltran; Silvia Paz; Antonio Ramirez de Arellano; Cristina Cardoso; Maribel Tribaldos Causadias
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 2.711

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.