Literature DB >> 23880377

Identifying a standard set of outcome parameters for the evaluation of orthogeriatric co-management for hip fractures.

I S Liem1, C Kammerlander, N Suhm, M Blauth, T Roth, M Gosch, A Hoang-Kim, D Mendelson, J Zuckerman, F Leung, J Burton, C Moran, M Parker, A Giusti, G Pioli, J Goldhahn, S L Kates.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Osteoporotic fractures are an increasing problem in the world due to the ageing of the population. Different models of orthogeriatric co-management are currently in use worldwide. These models differ for instance by the health-care professional who has the responsibility for care in the acute and early rehabilitation phases. There is no international consensus regarding the best model of care and which outcome parameters should be used to evaluate these models. The goal of this project was to identify which outcome parameters and assessment tools should be used to measure and compare outcome changes that can be made by the implementation of orthogeriatric co-management models and to develop recommendations about how and when these outcome parameters should be measured. It was not the purpose of this study to describe items that might have an impact on the outcome but cannot be influenced such as age, co-morbidities and cognitive impairment at admission.
METHODS: Based on a review of the literature on existing orthogeriatric co-management evaluation studies, 14 outcome parameters were evaluated and discussed in a 2-day meeting with panellists. These panellists were selected based on research and/or clinical expertise in hip fracture management and a common interest in measuring outcome in hip fracture care.
RESULTS: We defined 12 objective and subjective outcome parameters and how they should be measured: mortality, length of stay, time to surgery, complications, re-admission rate, mobility, quality of life, pain, activities of daily living, medication use, place of residence and costs. We could not recommend an appropriate tool to measure patients' satisfaction and falls. We defined the time points at which these outcome parameters should be collected to be at admission and discharge, 30 days, 90 days and 1 year after admission.
CONCLUSION: Twelve objective and patient-reported outcome parameters were selected to form a standard set for the measurement of influenceable outcome of patients treated in different models of orthogeriatric co-managed care.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Co-management; Geriatric Fracture Center; Hip fracture; Osteoporosis; Outcome parameter; Standard score set

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23880377     DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2013.06.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  49 in total

Review 1.  [Anesthesiological management of elderly trauma patients].

Authors:  M Coburn; A B Röhl; M Knobe; A Stevanovic; C Stoppe; R Rossaint
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  [Perioperative management : New anesthesiological challenges for elderly patients].

Authors:  S T Schäfer
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.041

3.  Outcome of older hip fracture patients on anticoagulation: a comparison of vitamin K-antagonists and Factor Xa inhibitors.

Authors:  M Gosch; M Jacobs; H Bail; S Grueninger; S Wicklein
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 4.  [Orthogeriatrics].

Authors:  M Gosch; C Kammerlander
Journal:  Z Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 1.281

Review 5.  Outcome parameters in orthogeriatric co‑management - a mini-review.

Authors:  Radko Komadina; Klaus W Wendt; Gerold Holzer; Tomaž Kocjan
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 1.704

6.  The orthogeriatric comanagement improves clinical outcomes of hip fracture in older adults.

Authors:  M Baroni; R Serra; V Boccardi; S Ercolani; E Zengarini; P Casucci; R Valecchi; G Rinonapoli; A Caraffa; P Mecocci; C Ruggiero
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 7.  Hip fracture registries: utility, description, and comparison.

Authors:  P Sáez-López; F Brañas; N Sánchez-Hernández; N Alonso-García; J I González-Montalvo
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Predictive Modeling for Geriatric Hip Fracture Patients: Early Surgery and Delirium Have the Largest Influence on Length of Stay.

Authors:  Garin Hecht; Christina A Slee; Parker B Goodell; Sandra L Taylor; Philip R Wolinsky
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2019-03-15       Impact factor: 3.020

Review 9.  [Proximal femoral fractures in the elderly].

Authors:  Carl Neuerburg; M Gosch; W Böcker; M Blauth; C Kammerlander
Journal:  Z Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.281

10.  Improved 1-year mortality in elderly patients with a hip fracture following integrated orthogeriatric treatment.

Authors:  E C Folbert; J H Hegeman; M Vermeer; E M Regtuijt; D van der Velde; H J Ten Duis; J P Slaets
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.