Literature DB >> 23880279

Reciprocating root canal technique induces greater debris accumulation than a continuous rotary technique as assessed by 3-dimensional micro-computed tomography.

Jonathan P Robinson1, Philip J Lumley, Paul R Cooper, Liam M Grover, A Damien Walmsley.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The ability of single-file, reciprocating instruments to remove inorganic debris is uncertain. By using micro-computed tomography (microCT), this study compared the 3-dimensional distribution, quantity, and density of remaining inorganic debris in the mesial root of mandibular molars after instrumentation. A single reciprocating file was compared with a multifile rotary instrumentation technique.
METHODS: Teeth were selected for instrumentation using reciprocating or rotary instruments (n = 19). Teeth were scanned using microCT before and after instrumentation. Through shape recognition and superimposition image analysis techniques, remaining inorganic tissue debris was identified, quantified, and visualized 3-dimensionally, mapping debris to its location. The use of a density phantom enabled the debris density to be calculated, giving a measure of compactness.
RESULTS: After single-file instrumentation, an average of 19.5% debris remained in the canal compared with 10.6% with the multifile technique (P = .01) and at an average density of 1.60 g/m(3) compared with 1.55 g/m(3) for the multifile system (P > .05). Isthmuses, protrusions, and irregularities in the canal wall were repeatedly seen at the locations of debris accumulation.
CONCLUSIONS: In canals with a high prevalence of isthmuses and protrusions, using multifile rotary systems may be preferred over reciprocating files because it can yield cleaner canals with less debris accumulation.
Copyright © 2013 American Association of Endodontists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Debris; micro–computed tomography; reciprocate movement; root canal preparation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23880279     DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.04.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endod        ISSN: 0099-2399            Impact factor:   4.171


  20 in total

1.  Unprepared surface areas, accumulated hard tissue debris, and dentinal crack formation after preparation using reciprocating or rotary instruments: a study in human cadavers.

Authors:  Andrea F Campello; Marília F Marceliano-Alves; José F Siqueira; Simone C Fonseca; Ricardo T Lopes; Flávio R F Alves
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 2.  Shaping the root canal system.

Authors:  M Waplington; A S McRobert
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.626

3.  F360 and F6 Skytaper: SEM evaluation of cleaning efficiency.

Authors:  Alberto Dagna; Giulia Gastaldo; Riccardo Beltrami; Marco Chiesa; Claudio Poggio
Journal:  Ann Stomatol (Roma)       Date:  2016-02-12

4.  Shaping ability of rotary or reciprocating systems for oval root canal preparation: a micro-computed tomography study.

Authors:  Camila Galletti Espir; Camila Almeida Nascimento-Mendes; Juliane Maria Guerreiro-Tanomaru; Bruno Cavalini Cavenago; Marco Antonio Hungaro Duarte; Mário Tanomaru-Filho
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2018-03-10       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Comparison of cleaning effectiveness of single rotary file OneShape and reciprocating F2 Protaper with Protaper Universal sequence: A SEM analysis.

Authors:  Adish A Saraf; Anand C Patil; T M Mangala; Rushikesh Mahaparale; Sneha Mali; Sagar Pawar
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2020-07-03

6.  Debris Evaluation after Root Canal Shaping with Rotating and Reciprocating Single-File Systems.

Authors:  Alberto Dagna; Giulia Gastaldo; Riccardo Beltrami; Claudio Poggio
Journal:  J Funct Biomater       Date:  2016-10-17

7.  Ex-vivo Smear Layer Removal Efficacy of Two Activated Irrigation Techniques After Reciprocating Instrumentation in Curved Canals.

Authors:  Tamara Costa Lopes Schiavotelo; Marcelo Santos Coelho; Luis Cardoso Rasquin; Daniel Guimarães Pedro Rocha; Carlos Eduardo Fontana; Carlos Eduardo da Silveira Bueno
Journal:  Open Dent J       Date:  2017-10-16

8.  Comparison of apical and coronal extrusions using reciprocating and rotary instrumentation systems.

Authors:  Yan Lu; Min Chen; Feng Qiao; Ligeng Wu
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 2.757

9.  In vitro investigation of the cleaning efficacy, shaping ability, preparation time and file deformation of continuous rotary, reciprocating rotary and manual instrumentations in primary molars.

Authors:  Nahid Ramazani; Abbas Mohammadi; Foroogh Amirabadi; Mohsen Ramazani; Farzane Ehsani
Journal:  J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects       Date:  2016-03-16

10.  Ultrasonic versus sonic activation of the final irrigant in root canals instrumented with rotary/reciprocating files: An in-vitro scanning electron microscopy analysis.

Authors:  Neha Deepak Khalap; Sharad Kokate; Vibha Hegde
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.