Literature DB >> 23880121

Maternal and child under-nutrition in rural and urban communities of Lagos state, Nigeria: the relationship and risk factors.

Idowu O Senbanjo1, Ibiyemi O Olayiwola, Wasiu A Afolabi, Olayinka C Senbanjo.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Poor nutritional status of mothers has a direct and indirect consequence on their own health and that of their children. The objective of this study was to determine the relationship between nutritional status of mothers and their children and the risk factors for under-nutrition among mothers and children in rural and urban communities of Lagos State, Nigeria.
METHODS: This was a cross sectional survey conducted using the multistage random sampling technique. A total of 300 mother-child pairs were studied, consisting of 150 each from rural and urban communities. Under-nutrition in mothers and children was determined using standard criteria.
RESULTS: The prevalence of under-nutrition among mothers was significantly higher in rural than urban communities (10.7% vs. 2.7%, p = 0.014). The prevalences of underweight and stunted children were also significantly higher in rural than urban communities (19.4% vs. 9.3%, p < 0.001) and (43.3% vs. 12.6%, p < 0.001) respectively. In rural communities, the risk of stunted mothers having children with stunting was about 7 times higher than those who were not (OR 6.7, 95% CI = 1.4-32.0, p = 0.007). In urban communities, undernourished mothers have about 11 and 12 times risk of having children with underweight and wasting respectively (OR 11.2, 95% CI = 1.4-86.5, p = 0.005) and (OR 12.3, 95% CI = 1.6-95.7, p = 0.003) respectively. The identified risk factors for maternal and child under nutrition differs across rural and urban communities.
CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of maternal and child under-nutrition is high in both communities although higher in rural communities. Efforts at reducing the vicious cycle of under-nutrition among mothers and children should concentrate on addressing risk factors specific for each community.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23880121      PMCID: PMC3725170          DOI: 10.1186/1756-0500-6-286

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Res Notes        ISSN: 1756-0500


Background

The nutritional status of a mother is important, both as an indicator of her overall health and as a predictor of pregnancy outcome for both mother and child [1,2]. Adequate maternal nutrition is needed for breastfeeding, recovery following the stress of pregnancy and labour, coping with child rearing and care and also preparation for future pregnancies [1]. A mother who was malnourished as a fetus, young child or adolescent is more likely to enter pregnancy stunted and malnourished. Her compromised nutritional status affects the health and nutrition of her own children. These intergenerational effects can be turned into a vicious cycle perpetuating malnutrition from one generation to the next [3]. The consequences of poor maternal nutritional status are reflected in high infant and maternal morbidity and mortality [4,5]. Globally, more than 3.5 million mothers and children under five years of age die unnecessarily each year due to the underlying cause of under-nutrition, and millions more are permanently disabled by the physical and mental effects of poor nutrition, the vast majority in south-central Asia and sub-Saharan Africa [5]. The United Nations provided eight Millennium Development Goals (MDG), which serve as a framework for the entire international community to work together to reduce child morbidity and mortality [6]. These goals were adopted by all world leaders in 2000 and are set to be achieved by 2015. In Nigeria, an evaluation of the MDG between 2000 and 2007 showed that their achievement in reducing child mortality rate was unsatisfactory, while the maternal mortality rate was actually increasing [7]. Mid-way to the end of the MDG’s implementation period, there remain wide gaps between targets and actual achievement particularly in the rural communities. It is a well-known fact that, attainment of many of these MDG’s requires good nutrition status for children and adolescent girls. Nigeria is the most populous country in Africa, with a population of about 148 million. About sixty percent of this population resides in the rural areas, while about forty-four percent of the population is made up of children and mothers [8]. In Lagos state, Nigeria, the infant mortality rate is 85 deaths per 1000 live births, relatively better than the national average. The maternal mortality rate is 650 deaths per 100,000 live births [9]. Most of these deaths have malnutrition as the predisposing factor, either directly or indirectly. However, these deaths are preventable. The risk factors for under-nutrition among mothers and children have been well described but data establishing differences in risk factors for under-nutrition between urban and rural communities for both mothers and children are few. Therefore, this study was carried out to determine the relationship between the nutritional status of mothers and their children and the risk factors for under-nutrition among mothers and children living in rural and urban communities of Lagos state, Nigeria.

Methods

Study area

The study was carried out in the Epe Local Government Area and the Alimosho Local Government Area in Lagos State, Nigeria, which were randomly selected from the 20 local governments in Lagos state officially recognized by the Federal government of Nigeria. Lagos state is Nigeria’s former capital city. The vegetation is that of the tropical rain forest. It has an annual rainfall of 180 centimeters and a mean temperature of 26°C. It is 200 – 500 meters above sea level. Lagos has a very diverse and fast-growing population, resulting from heavy and ongoing migration to the city from all parts of Nigeria as well as neighbouring countries. Though the Yoruba, an African people inhabiting southwest Nigeria, constitute the city’s principal ethnic group, there are a significant proportion of other ethnic groups, particularly the Ibos, Ibibio and Hausa.

Study design

The study was a cross sectional survey of women in the reproductive age group and their children aged zero to fifty-nine months, in rural and urban communities located in randomly selected Local Government Areas of Lagos State, Nigeria.

Ethical clearance

Ethical clearance was obtained from the Lagos State University Teaching Hospital Research/Ethics Committee; permission was also obtained from the parents that were involved.

Method of sampling

A multistage random sampling technique was used to select subjects. Epe and Agbowa were randomly selected from the Epe LGA, representing urban and rural communities, respectively, while Akowonjo and Orisumbare were selected from the Alimosho LGA, representing urban and rural communities, respectively. From each communities, houses were selected ramdomly using the table of random numbers. The sample size: The minimum number of the subjects ‘n’ required for the study was estimated from the formula: Where: ‘z’ is the critical value and in a two-tailed test it is equal to 1.96. ‘p’ is the estimated prevalence of malnutrition in women, which was taken as 9 percent, based on an earlier report by Nigerian Food Consumption and Nutrition Survey for Southwestern part of Nigeria [10]. ‘d’ is the absolute sampling error that can be tolerated. In this study, it was fixed at 5 percent. Therefore the minimum sample size: ‘ n ’ = 1.962 × 0.09 × (1–0.09) ÷ 0.052 = 125.9 which is approximately 126. Taking into consideration a possible attrition rate of 10 percent, the minimum sample size for this study will be 137. This was rounded up to 150 each for rural and urban communities. In each household, the parents of children aged zero to fifty-nine months were identified, and informed consent was obtained prior to the beginning of the study. The parents were interviewed according to the proforma specifically designed for the study. Information was obtained on demographic, socio-economic and environmental characteristics of the family. The families were assigned a socio-economic class using the method recommended by Ogunlesi et al [11]. The parents’ occupations and highest education attained were scored from 1 (highest) to 5 (lowest). The mean score for both parents gave the social class, falling within the 1 – 5 range. Those with mean scores of 1 and 2 were further classified as upper class, those with mean score of 3 were classified as middle class, while those with mean scores of 4 and 5 were classified as falling in the lower social class.

Anthropometry

The children were weighed using an electronic weighing scale calibrated in 100 g units (SECA/UNICEF, Australia). Children who were too scared to stand on the scale were weighed together with the mother, and the mother’s weight automatically deducted to obtain the weight of the child. All children were weighed naked and to the nearest 0.1 kg. Length of children aged less than twenty-four months was measured using an infantiometer. This was done on a firm surface with assistance, usually by the mother. The knees were held down and the head held firmly against the headboard. These measurements were done to the nearest 0.1 cm. Height was measured using a height board for children aged twenty-four to fifty-nine months. This was done with the children standing erect without shoes, with eyes facing forward and the feet together on the horizontal plane. The mother’s weight was measured using the same weighing scale used for children. The height of the mothers was also measured using a height board. This was done with the mothers standing erect, without shoes, with eyes facing forward and feet together on the horizontal plane. Standardization checks on the tools for anthropometric measurements were done periodically. Malnutrition in children was calculated from the degree of stunting (height-for-age), underweight (weight-for-age) and wasting (weight-for-height) following World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines and cut off points [12]. In this study, a child was said to be underweight, wasted and stunted if the Weight-for-Age, Weight-for-Height and Height-for-Age were below minus two Standard Deviation (-2 SD) from the median of each international reference standard, respectively. A mother was said to be undernourished if her BMI was less than 18.5 Kg/m2, or stunted if her height was less than 152 cm [12].

Statistical analysis

WHO Anthro 2007 was used to generate z-score values for weight-for-age, height-for-age and weight-for-height. All data were entered into and analysed using SPSS for windows software version 13. The means and standard deviations (SD) were calculated for continuous variables, while ratios and proportions were calculated for categorical variables. Categorical variables were compared using the Pearson Chi square (χ2) test. Independent t-test was used to calculate mean differences for continuous variables between urban and rural communities. Using logistic regression, odds ratio and its 95% confidence interval were used to calculate risk of occurence of under-nutrition in a child if the mother is undernourished. ‘P’ values less than 0.05 were accepted as statistically significant.

Results

Socio-demographic characteristics

A total of 300 mother-child pairs were studied, consisting of 150 each from rural and urban communities, and the results obtained were analysed. Table 1 shows the socio-demographic characteristics and nutritional status of the study population according to their place of residence.
Table 1

Socio-demographic characteristics and nutritional status of study population according to place of residence

ParametersTotal (n = 300)Rural (n = 150)Urban (n = 150)P value
Mothers characteristics
 
 
 
 
Age (years)*
30.0 ± 5.6
29.6 ± 6.1
30.4 ± 5.6
0.186
Family setting
 
 
 
0.001
  Monogamy
265 (88.3)
119 (79.3)
146 (97.3)
 
  Polygamy
35 (11.7)
31 20.7)
4 (2.7)
 
Parity
 
 
 
0.001
  1
83 (27.7)
24 (16.0)
59 (39.3)
 
  2
183 (61.0)
101 (67.3)
82 (54.7)
 
  5 – 7
34 (11.3)
25 (16.7)
9 (6.0)
 
Age at first birth
 
 
 
0.001
  15 – 19
29 (9.7)
22 (14.7)
7 (4.7)
 
  20 – 24
127 (42.3)
77 (51.3)
50 (33.6)
 
  25 – 29
96 (32.0)
41 (27.3)
55 (36.9)
 
  30 – 34
37 (12.3)
5 (3.3)
32 (21.3)
 
  35 - 39
8 (2.7)
3 (2.0)
5 (3.4)
 
Educational level of mother
 
 
 
0.001
  No formal education
4 (1.3)
3 (2.0)
1 (0.7)
 
  Primary
72 (24.0)
55 (36.7)
17 (11.3)
 
  Secondary
155 (51.7)
79 (52.7)
76 (50.7)
 
  Postsecondary
69 (23.0)
13 (8.7)
56 (37.3)
 
Social class
 
 
 
0.001
  Upper
19 (6.3)
0 (0.0)
19 (12.7)
 
  Middle
50 (16.7)
15 (10.0)
35 (23.3)
 
  Lower
231 (77.0)
135 (90.0)
96 (64.0)
 
Height, less than 152 cm
27 (9.0)
11 (7.3)
16 (10.7)
0.313
BMI (kg/m2)*
24.9 ± 5.0
24.4 ± 5.0
29.4 ± 4.9
0.092
Undernutrition, BMI < 18.5 kg/m2
20 (6.7)
16 (10.7)
4 (2.7)
0.014
Children characteristics
 
 
 
 
Age (months)*
25.3 ± 16.4
31.3 ± 16.4
19.3 ± 4.0
0.001
Sex
 
 
 
0.248
  Male
142 (47.3)
66 (44.0)
76 (50.7)
 
  Female
158 (52.7)
84 (56.0)
74 (49.3)
 
Birth order
 
 
 
0.000
  1
118 (39.3)
39 (26.0)
79 (52.7)
 
  2-4
161 (53.6)
97 (64.7)
64 (42.7)
 
  5 – 7
21 (7.0)
14 (9.3)
7 (4.7)
 
Weight-for-age z score, < -2 SD
43 (14.3)
29 (19.4)
14 (9.3)
0.001
Height-for-Age z score, < -2 SD
84 (28.0)
65 (43.3)
19 (12.6)
0.001
Weight-for-height z score, < -2 SD31 (8.3)18 (12.0)13 (8.7)0.118

Values are number (%) unless otherwise stated; *values are mean ± SD; †Adjusted for social class. ♯Upper social class includes parents such as senior government employee, high scale traders, and professionals, middle class include junior government employee, teachers and technicians while lower social class are peasant farmers, artisans, security agents, messengers, apprentice, laborers and the unemployed.

Socio-demographic characteristics and nutritional status of study population according to place of residence Values are number (%) unless otherwise stated; *values are mean ± SD; †Adjusted for social class. ♯Upper social class includes parents such as senior government employee, high scale traders, and professionals, middle class include junior government employee, teachers and technicians while lower social class are peasant farmers, artisans, security agents, messengers, apprentice, laborers and the unemployed. Age at first birth of mothers in rural communities was significantly lower than for mothers in urban communities (p < 0.001). Polygamous homes was siginificantly common in rural than uban communities (p < 0.001) while the parity of mothers was higher in rural than urban communities (p < 0.001). The educational level of mothers was significantly better in urban as opposed to rural areas (p < 0.001) and a significant proportion of the mothers in rural compared with urban communities (90.0% vs. 60.4%, p < 0.001) were from the lower social class. The mean age of the children in the rural communities was significantly higher than that of children from urban communities (31.3 vs. 19.3 months; p < 0.001). Gender distributions of the children were not statistically different, with a male: female ratio of 1:1.3 in rural areas and 1:1 in urban areas. Seventy-nine (52.7%) children in urban areas were the first born compared with 39 (26%) children in rural areas. This difference was statistically significant (p < 0.001).

Nutritional status of mothers and children

Using a BMI of 18.5 kg/m2 as the cut off point, 16 (10.7%) mothers from rural communities and 4 (2.7%) mothers from urban communities were undernourished. This difference was significant even after adjusting for social class (OR 4.3, 95% CI = 1.4-13.4, p = 0.014). However, there was no significant difference in the pevalence of stunting between mothers from rural and urban communities (7.3% vs. 10.7%, p = 0.313) respectively. The prevalences of underweight and stunting were significantly higher among children from rural than urban areas (19.4% vs. 9.3%, OR 3.8, 95% CI = 1.8-8.1, p < 0.001) and (43.3% vs. 12.6%, OR 7.4, 95% CI = 3.8-14.1, p < 0.001) respectively.

Relationship between maternal and child nutritional status

Table 2 shows the relationship between stunted mothers and the nutritional status of children. In rural communities, the risk of stunted mothers having chidren with stunting is about 7 times higher than mothers that are not stunted (OR 6.7, 95% CI = 1.4-32, p = 0.007).
Table 2

Relationship between mother’s height and child’s nutritional status

Rural
Indicator of childMother’s height (cm)Odds ratio95% CI
Nutritional status
< 152
≥ 152
 
 
Weight-for-age Z-score
 
 
 
 
  Underweight
3 (10.7)
26 (89.3)
1.63
0.40 – 6.57
  Not underweight
8 (6.6)
113 (93.4)
1
 
Height-for-age Z-score
 
 
 
 
  Stunted
9 (13.9)
56 (86.1)
6.67*
1.39 – 32.0
  Not stunted
2 (2.4)
83 (97.6)
1
 
Weight-for-height Z-score
 
 
 
 
  Wasted
2 (11.1)
16 (88.9)
1.71
0.34 – 8.62
  Not wasted
9 (6.8)
123 (93.2)
1
 
Urban
Weight-for-age Z-score
 
 
 
 
  Underweight
2 (14.3)
12 (85.7)
1.45
0.29 – 7.16
  Not underweight
14 (10.3)
122 (89.7)
1
 
Height-for-age Z-score
 
 
 
 
  Stunted
3 (15.8)
16 (84.2)
1.70
0.44 – 6.63
  Not stunted
13 (9.9)
118 (90.1)
1
 
Weight-for-height Z-score
 
 
 
 
  Wasted
0 (0.0)
13 (100)
undefined
 
  Not wasted16 (11.7)121 (88.3)  

*p < 0.01; †Adjusted for social class, age at first birth, parity and family setting.

Relationship between mother’s height and child’s nutritional status *p < 0.01; †Adjusted for social class, age at first birth, parity and family setting. Table 3 shows the relationship between under-nutrition in mothers and the nutritional status of children. In urban communities, the risk of undernourished mothers having childen with underweight and wasting were about 11 and 12 times respectively higher than mothers that were not undernourished (OR 11.2, 95% CI = 1.4-86.5, p = 0.005) and (OR 12.3, 95% CI = 1.6-95.7, p = 0.003) respectively. Although, the risk of undernourished urban mothers having stunted children was about 2 times higher than those not undernourished, this difference was not significant (OR 2.4, 95% CI = 0.2-24, p = 0.452).
Table 3

Relationship between mother and child nutritional status

Rural
Indicator of childMother’s BMI (kg/m2)Odds ratio95% CI
Nutritional status
< 18.5
≥ 18.5
 
 
Weight-for-age Z-score
 
 
 
 
  Underweight
1 (3.4)
28 (96.6)
0.25
0.03- 1.99
  Not underweight
15 (12.4)
106 (87.6)
1
 
Height-for-age Z-score
 
 
 
 
  Stunted
8 (12.3)
57 (87.7)
1.35
0.48 – 3.81
  Not stunted
8 (9.6)
77 (90.4)
1
 
Weight-for-height Z-score
 
 
 
 
  Wasted
3 (16.7)
15 (83.3)
1.83
0.47- 7.17
  Not wasted
13 (10.0)
119 (90.0)
1
 
Urban
Weight-for-age Z-score
 
 
 
 
  Underweight
2 (14.3)
12 (85.7)
11.2*
1.44 – 86.5
  Not underweight
2 (1.5)
134 (98.5)
1
 
Height-for-age Z-score
 
 
 
 
  Stunted
1 (5.3)
18 (94.7)
2.37
0.23 – 24.03
  Not stunted
3 (2.3)
128 (97.7)
1
 
Weight-for-height Z-score
 
 
 
 
  Wasted
2 (15.4)
11 (84.6)
12.3*
1.57 – 95.7
  Not wasted2 (1.5)135 (98.5)1 

*P < 0.01; †Adjusted for social class, age at first birth, parity and family setting.

Relationship between mother and child nutritional status *P < 0.01; †Adjusted for social class, age at first birth, parity and family setting.

Risk factors for under-nutrition among mothers

Tables 4 and 5 shows the influence of various socio-demographic factors on the nutritional status of mothers in rural and urban communities. In rural communities, there was significant association between nutritional status of mothers and family setting (χ2 = 4.67, p = 0.031), age at first birth (χ2 = 12.2, p = 0.016), and level of education of mothers (χ2 = 34.7, p < 0.001). While in urban communities, nutritional status of mothers was significantly related to parity (χ2 = 28.2, p < 0.001) and level of education of mothers (χ2 = 15.4, p < 0.001).
Table 4

Nutritional status in relation to socio-demographic variables for rural mothers

ParametersNumber of women (n =150)Number (%) malnourishedP values
Age (years)
 
 
0.090
  15 – 19
1
0 (0.0)
 
  20 – 24
25
2 (8.0)
 
  25 – 29
56
11 (19.6)
 
  30 – 34
36
2 (5.6)
 
  35 – 49
32
1 (3.1)
 
Marital status
 
 
0.782
  Not yet married
3
0 (0.0)
 
  Married
146
16 (11.0)
 
  Widow
1
0 (0.0)
 
Family setting
 
 
0.031
  Monogamy
119
16 (13.4)
 
  Polygamy
31
0 (0.0)
 
Age at first birth
 
 
0.016
  15- 19
22
0 (0.0)
 
  20 – 24
78
14 (17.9)
 
  25 – 29
42
1 (2.4)
 
  30 – 34
5
0 (0.0)
 
  35 - 39
3
1 (33.3)
 
Parity
 
 
0.587
  1
24
3 (12.5)
 
  2
51
8 (15.7)
 
  3
22
0 (0.0)
 
  4
28
3 (10.7)
 
  5 -7
25
2 (8.0)
 
Education of mothers
 
 
0.000
  No formal education
3
0 (0.0)
 
  Primary
55
1 (1.8)
 
  Secondary
79
15 (19.0)
 
  Post-secondary
13
0 (0.0)
 
Social class
 
 
0.514
  Upper
0
0 (0.0)
 
  Middle
15
1 (6.7)
 
  Lower13515 (11.1) 
Table 5

Nutritional status in relation to socio-demographic variables for urban mothers

ParametersNumber of women (n = 150)Number (%) malnourishedP values
Age (years)
 
 
0.533
  15 – 19
0
0 (0.0)
 
  20 – 24
18
1 (5.6)
 
  25 – 29
52
1 (1.9)
 
  30 – 34
35
0 (0.0)
 
  35 – 49
45
2 (4.4)
 
Marital status
 
 
0.478
  Not yet married
3
0 (0.0)
 
  Married
147
4 (2.7)
 
Family setting
 
 
0.737
  Monogamy
146
4 (2.7)
 
  Polygamy
4
0 (0.0)
 
Age at first birth
 
 
0.130
  15- 19
7
1 (14.3)
 
  20 – 24
50
2 (4.0)
 
  25 – 29
55
1 (1.8)
 
  30 – 34
32
0 (0.0)
 
  35 - 39
5
0 (0.0)
 
Parity
 
 
0.000
  1
59
1 (1.7)
 
  2
49
1 (2.0)
 
  3
23
0 (0.0)
 
  4
10
0 (0.0)
 
  5 - 6
9
2 (22.2)
 
Education of mothers
 
 
0.000
  No formal education
1
0 (0.0)
 
  Primary
17
3 (17.6)
 
  Secondary
76
1 (1.3)
 
  Post-secondary
56
0 (0.0)
 
Social class
 
 
0.128
  Upper
19
0 (0.0)
 
  Middle
35
0 (0.0)
 
  Lower964 (4.4) 
Nutritional status in relation to socio-demographic variables for rural mothers Nutritional status in relation to socio-demographic variables for urban mothers

Risk factors for under-nutrition among children

Tables 6 and 7 shows the influence of various socio-demographic factors on the nutritional status of children in rural and urban communities. In rural communities, Stunting was significantly related to lower parents’ social class (χ2 = 10.5, p = 0.005) only while wasting was significantly associated with low age of child (χ2 = 15.0, p = 0.005) and low educational level of the father (χ2 = 22.8, p = 0.03). In urban communities, underweight was significantly related to gender (χ2 = 4.81, p = 0.028) and birth order (χ2 = 16.5, p = 0.006). Stunting was significantly related to gender (χ2 = 7.0, p = 0.008) only while wasting was significantly related to birth order (χ2 = 17.5, p = 0.004) only.
Table 6

Nutritional status in relation to socio-demographic variables for rural children

ParametersNumber of children (No = 150)≤ -2 SD WAZ
≤ -2 SD HAZ
≤ -2 SD WHZ
No (%)P valueNo (%)P valueNo (%)P value
Age (months)
 
 
0.085
 
0.693
 
0.012
  0 – 11
11
4 (36.4)
 
4 (36.4)
 
4 (36.4)
 
  12 – 23
42
13 (31.0)
 
22 (52.4)
 
7 (16.7)
 
  24- 35
34
2 (5.9)
 
17 (50.0)
 
0 (0.0)
 
  36 – 47
28
4 (14.3)
 
7 (25.0)
 
1 (3.6)
 
  48 – 59
35
5 (14.3)
 
13 (37.1)
 
4 (11.4)
 
Sex
 
 
0.187
 
0.026
 
0.238
  Male
66
16 (24.2)
 
27 (40.9)
 
8 (12.1)
 
  Female
84
12 (14.2)
 
36 (42.9)
 
8 (9.5)
 
Birth order
 
 
0.365
 
0.241
 
0.767
  1
38
10 (26.3)
 
14 (36.8)
 
7 (18.4)
 
  2
45
5 (11.1)
 
23 (51.1)
 
3 (6.7)
 
  3
33
6 (18.1)
 
13 (39.4)
 
3 (9.1)
 
  4
19
6 (31.5)
 
10 (52.6)
 
1 (5.3)
 
  5 – 7
14
1 (7.1)
 
3 (21.4)
 
2 (14.2)
 
Total number of children
 
 
0.070
 
0.078
 
0.947
  1
23
9 (39.1)
 
10 (43.5)
 
4 (17.4)
 
  2
50
6 (12.0)
 
21 (42.0)
 
6 (12.0)
 
  3
28
3 (10.7)
 
16 (57.1)
 
2 (7.1)
 
  4
25
4 (16.0)
 
6 (24.0)
 
2 (8.0)
 
  ≥ 5
23
6 (26.1)
 
10 (43.5)
 
2 (8.7)
 
Educational level of mother
 
 
0.706
 
0.066
 
0.741
  No formal education
3
2 (66.7)
 
2 (66.7)
 
1 (33.3)
 
  Primary
55
11 (20.0)
 
26 (47.3)
 
7 (12.7)
 
  Secondary
79
14 (17.7)
 
32 (40.5)
 
7 (8.9)
 
  Postsecondary
13
2 (15.4)
 
3 (23.1)
 
1 (7.7)
 
Educational level of father
 
 
0.378
 
0.142
 
0.000
  No formal education
4
2 (50.0)
 
3 (75.0)
 
2 (50.0)
 
  Primary
13
3 (23.1)
 
5 (38.5)
 
2 (15.4)
 
  Secondary
99
18 (18.2)
 
49 (49.5)
 
9 (9.1)
 
  Postsecondary
34
7 (14.6)
 
6 (17.6)
 
5 (8.8)
 
Social class
 
 
0.330
 
0.005
 
0.352
  Upper
0
0 (0.0)
 
0 (0.0)
 
0 (0.0)
 
  Middle
15
3 (30.0)
 
1 (6.7)
 
2 (13.3)
 
  Lower13525 (18.5) 62 (45.9) 14 (10.4) 
Table 7

Nutritional status in relation to socio-demographic variables for urban children

ParametersNumber of children (No = 150)≤ -2 SD WAZ No (%) P value ≤ -2 SD HAZ No (%) P value ≤ -2 SD WHZ No (%) P value 
Age (months)
 
 
0.105
 
0.713
 
0.815
  0 – 11
50
8 (16.0)
 
8 (16.0)
 
5 (10.0)
 
  12 – 23
48
6 (12.5)
 
8 (16.7)
 
6 (12.5)
 
  24- 35
27
0 (0.0)
 
2 (7.4)
 
2 (7.4)
 
  36 – 47
18
0 (0.0)
 
1 (5.6)
 
0 (0.0)
 
  48 – 59
7
0 (0.0)
 
0 (0.0)
 
0 (0.0)
 
Sex
 
 
0.028
 
0.008
 
0.810
  Male
76
11 (14.5)
 
15 (19.7)
 
7 (9.2)
 
  Female
74
3 (4.1)
 
4 (5.4)
 
6 (8.1)
 
Birth order
 
 
0.006
 
0.653
 
0.004
  1
79
6 (7.6)
 
12 (15.2)
 
7 (8.9)
 
  2
34
4 (11.8)
 
7 (20.6)
 
2 (5.9)
 
  v3
21
0 (0.0)
 
0 (0.0)
 
0 (0.0)
 
  4
9
2 (22.2)
 
0 (0.0)
 
2 (22.2)
 
  ≥ 5
7
2 (28.6)
 
0 (0.0)
 
2 (28.6)
 
Total number of children
 
 
0.109
 
0.109
 
0.094
  1
59
8 (13.6)
 
11 (18.6)
 
5 (8.5)
 
  2
48
2 (4.2)
 
8 (16.7)
 
4 (8.3)
 
  3
22
0 (0.0)
 
0 (0.0)
 
0 (0.0)
 
  4
12
2 (16.7)
 
0 (0.0)
 
2 (16.6)
 
  ≥ 5
9
2 (22.2)
 
0 (0.0)
 
2 (22.2)
 
Educational level of mother
 
 
0.782
 
0.402
 
0.832
  No formal education
1
0 (0.0)
 
0 (0.0)
 
0 (0.0)
 
  Primary
17
2 (11.8)
 
1 (5.9)
 
2 (11.8)
 
  Secondary
76
10 (13.2)
 
11 (14.5)
 
6 (7.9)
 
  Postsecondary
56
2 (3.6)
 
7 (12.5)
 
5 (8.9)
 
Educational level of father
 
 
0.910
 
0.541
 
0.953
  No formal education
1
0 (0.0)
 
1 (100.0)
 
0 (0.0)
 
  Primary
7
2 (28.6)
 
1 (14.3)
 
2 (28.6)
 
  Secondary
69
6 (8.7)
 
8 (11.6)
 
5 (7.2)
 
  Postsecondary
73
6 (8.2)
 
9 (12.3)
 
6 (8.2)
 
Social class
 
 
0.197
 
0.519
 
0.472
  Upper
19
1 (5.2)
 
1 (5.2)
 
0 (0.0)
 
  Middle
35
1 (18.5)
 
4 (11.4)
 
5 (14.3)
 
  Lower9612 (12.5) 14 (14.6) 8 (8.3) 
Nutritional status in relation to socio-demographic variables for rural children Nutritional status in relation to socio-demographic variables for urban children

Discussion

This study has shown that the prevalence of maternal and child under-nutrition among mothers and children in Lagos state, Nigeria remains high particularly in the rural communities. This is consistent with pevious studies on Nigerian women and children [13,14]. In our study, many of the socio-demographic factors which favour the occurrence of maternal and child under-nutrition were significantly higher in the rural communities. For instance, teenage pregnancy and high parity which are known to deplete mothers of nutrients because of physiological immaturity and the stresses of multiple pregnancies and lactations with inadequate recuperative intervals between pregnancies were commoner in rural communities [15]. Similarly, low maternal education and low socio-economic class which limit mothers’ utilisation of available resouces for the improvement of their own nutritional status and that of their families were also commoner in rural communities. These may explain the high prevalence of maternal and child under-nutrition in our rural communities. The overall prevalence of under-nutrition for mothers in this study was 6.7%; this is within the range of 5 to 20% reported for African women [16]. However, it is lower than the 25% reported for Ethiopian women [17], over 60% for Indian women [18] and 43.7% for women in Bangladesh [19]. This difference might be a reflection of the different environmental, cultural and socioeconomic situations in these countries which further implicates the important role of poverty, ignorance, food insecurity and infectious disease burden in maternal and child under-nutrition. Despite several approaches and attempts at reducing rates of under-nutrition among Nigerian children, the prevalence remains high. In response to this problem of malnutrition, the Nigerian government launched its national policy on food and nutrition in 2002, with the goal of improving the nutritional status of all Nigerians [20]. This policy sets specific targets, which include reducing moderate and severe malnutrition among children under five years old by 30% by the year 2010. Instead of a reduction, what has been observed is that the national prevalence of under-nutrition remained largely stable between the years 2003 and 2009, with the prevalences of underweight, wasting and stunting essentially static at 24%, 11% and 43%, respectively [21]. In our study, the values from rural areas were similar to these national figures, while the values from urban areas were lower than the national figures, except for the prevalence of wasting. This implies that efforts at achieving effective control of under-nutrition should be concentrated in rural areas. In both rural and urban communities, we observed a relationship between mother and child under-nutrition. This is similar to what was observed in rural Guinea by Mock et al [22] and in rural Ethiopia by Lindtjorn and Alemu [23]. In particular, in the rural communities, there was an association between chronic malnutrition in mothers and their children. This could be due to the influence of genetics on height, or could actually be due to a vicious circle of poorly nourished female children who grow up to be stunted and then bear their own children who are equally under-nourished, continuing the cycle. It is worth noting that differences exist in the maternal-child nutrition associations across rural and urban communities. In rural communities, the maternal child nutrition association was chronic malnutrition while in urban it was acute malnutrition and this raises suspicion of persistent suboptimal nutritional practices in rural communities. Malnutrition has short and long term consequences on health of children. An important long term consequence of chronic malnutrition is that children with stunting are prone to accumulation of body fat, especially central fat [24]. This could increase the burden of non-communicable diseases such as diabetes mellitus and hypertension thereby further stretching the health system. In this study, the identified risk factors for maternal under-nutrition were different across rural and urban communities. The only risk factor that cut across both communities was low maternal education. In the rural communities, the lower prevalence of maternal under-nutrition in polygamous homes was suggestive of supportive role of co-wives for each other and possibly their husband. According to Madhaven [25], it is also possible for the co-wives to live in competition with each other resulting in poor maternal and child health. Similar to finding in other studies [16,17], mothers in our rural communities who started having children at a low age and those who started late were at risk of poor nutritional status. This has been ascribed to physiological unpreparedness and maternal depletion of nutrients. In our urban communities, mothers having more than 4 children were at risk of under-nutrition and this is also similar to the findings in other studies [17,26]. This is instructive, if one considers the fact that the standard of living in Lagos city is high and having more children ordinarily translate to more stresses of pregnancy, more financial burden, little food to eat and therefore poor maternal nutritional status. For children, the risk factors for underweight, wasting and stunting also differs across rural and urban communities. In rural communities, they were mostly socio-economic factors while in urban communities they were mostly biological factors. These risk factors need to be taking into consideration when planning interventional strategies aimed at reducing maternal and child under-nutrition in our rural and urban communities. Though our study was limited to 2 local government areas of Lagos State, the findings can be generalized to the broader community. We recommend that further cross-sectional research work involving other communities and a larger sample frame is needed to better understand the relationship between mother and child under-nutrition and the risk factors for under-nutrition among mothers and children.

Conclusions

In conclusion, this study reveals high prevalence of maternal and child under-nutrition in both communities particularly in rural communities. It also confirms relationship between maternal and child under-nutrition. The risk factors for maternal and child under-nutrition differs across rural and urban communities. In order to reduce morbidity and mortality among mothers and children to the barest minimum, every effort must be made by the government to improve maternal and child nutritional status. This may involve public health enlightenment campaign discouraging teenage pregnancy and high parity of mothers which predisposes to poor nutritional status, complications during pregnancy and therefore risk of poor outcomes both for the mother and the child. There is also need to increase women education as this will make them receptive to health interventions that will improve their nutritional status and that of their child. It will also improve their earning power and hence good food puchasing power for the household.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interest.

Authors’ contributions

IOS concieved, designed, analyzed the data and wrote the first draft. IOO and WAO participated in the design, supervised data collection and guided writing of the manuscript. COS participated in the design and data collection. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
  12 in total

1.  The social context of children's nutritional status in rural South Africa.

Authors:  Sangeetha Madhavan; Nicholas Townsend
Journal:  Scand J Public Health Suppl       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.021

Review 2.  Maternal and child undernutrition: global and regional exposures and health consequences.

Authors:  Robert E Black; Lindsay H Allen; Zulfiqar A Bhutta; Laura E Caulfield; Mercedes de Onis; Majid Ezzati; Colin Mathers; Juan Rivera
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2008-01-19       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Determinants of health and nutritional status of rural Nigerian women.

Authors:  H N Ene-Obong; G I Enugu; A C Uwaegbute
Journal:  J Health Popul Nutr       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.000

4.  Intra-household correlations of nutritional status in rural Ethiopia.

Authors:  B Lindtjørn; T Alemu
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 7.196

Review 5.  Malnutrition and health in developing countries.

Authors:  Olaf Müller; Michael Krawinkel
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2005-08-02       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 6.  The risk of maternal nutritional depletion and poor outcomes increases in early or closely spaced pregnancies.

Authors:  Janet C King
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.798

Review 7.  Maternal and child nutrition in Sub-Saharan Africa: challenges and interventions.

Authors:  Anna Lartey
Journal:  Proc Nutr Soc       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 6.297

8.  Physical status: the use and interpretation of anthropometry. Report of a WHO Expert Committee.

Authors: 
Journal:  World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser       Date:  1995

9.  The evaluation of maternal health in rural western China.

Authors:  Leilei Pei; Lin Ren; Duolao Wang; Hong Yan
Journal:  Ethn Health       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 2.772

10.  The effect of maternal anthropometric characteristics and social factors on gestational age and birth weight in Sudanese newborn infants.

Authors:  Eltahir M Elshibly; Gerd Schmalisch
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2008-07-18       Impact factor: 3.295

View more
  18 in total

1.  Short- and long-term effects of a maternal low-energy diet ad libitum during gestation and/or lactation on physiological parameters of mothers and male offspring.

Authors:  Maria Cláudia Alheiros-Lira; Luciana Lima Araújo; Natália Giovana Viana Trindade; Erika Maria Santos da Silva; Taisy Cinthia Ferro Cavalcante; Gisélia de Santana Muniz; Elizabeth Nascimento; Carol Góis Leandro
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 5.614

2.  Rural-urban disparity in lung function parameters of Nigerian children: effects of socio-economic, nutritional and housing factors.

Authors:  Bankole Peter Kuti; Oluwatoyin Ibukun Oladimeji; Demilade Kehinde Kuti; Adewuyi Temidayo Adeniyi; Emmanuel Oluwatosin Adeniji; Yetunde Justinah Osundare
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2017-11-15

3.  Household food insecurity is associated with both body mass index and middle upper-arm circumference of mothers in northwest Ethiopia: a comparative study.

Authors:  Achenef Motbainor; Alemayehu Worku; Abera Kumie
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2017-05-26

4.  Low birth weight and macrosomia in Tigray, Northern Ethiopia: who are the mothers at risk?

Authors:  Hayelom Gebrekirstos Mengesha; Alem Desta Wuneh; Berhe Weldearegawi; Divya L Selvakumar
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 2.125

5.  Media use and excess body weight among women in Nigeria: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Bishwajit Ghose; Sanni Yaya
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  [Development of a predictive score of severe acute malnutrition among children under 5 years of age].

Authors:  Olivier Mukuku; Augustin Mulangu Mutombo; Lewis Kipili Kamona; Toni Kasole Lubala; Paul Makan Mawaw; Michel Ntani Aloni; Stanislas Okitotsho Wembonyama; Oscar Numbi Luboya
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2018-04-02

7.  Risk factors of malnutrition among preschool children in Terengganu, Malaysia: a case control study.

Authors:  Hui Jie Wong; Foong Ming Moy; Sulochana Nair
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2014-08-03       Impact factor: 3.295

8.  Learning the ABCs of pregnancy and newborn care through mobile technology.

Authors:  Angela Afua Entsieh; Maria Emmelin; Karen Odberg Pettersson
Journal:  Glob Health Action       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 2.640

9.  Dietary practices and nutritional status of under-five children in rural and urban communities of Lagos State, Nigeria.

Authors:  Idowu O Senbanjo; Ibiyemi O Olayiwola; Wasiu A O Afolabi
Journal:  Niger Med J       Date:  2016 Nov-Dec

10.  PREVALENCE AND DETERMINANTS OF STUNTING AMONG PRIMARY SCHOOL CHILDREN IN RURAL AND URBAN COMMUNITIES IN OBAFEMI OWODE LOCAL GOVERNMENT AREA, SOUTHWESTERN NIGERIA.

Authors:  W U Adenuga; T A Obembe; K O Odebunmi; M C Asuzu
Journal:  Ann Ib Postgrad Med       Date:  2017-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.