Literature DB >> 23879877

Look again: effects of brain images and mind-brain dualism on lay evaluations of research.

Cayce J Hook1, Martha J Farah.   

Abstract

Brain scans have frequently been credited with uniquely seductive and persuasive qualities, leading to claims that fMRI research receives a disproportionate share of public attention and funding. It has been suggested that functional brain images are fascinating because they contradict dualist beliefs regarding the relationship between the body and the mind. Although previous research has indicated that brain images can increase judgments of an article's scientific reasoning, the hypotheses that brain scans make research appear more interesting, surprising, or worthy of funding have not been tested. Neither has the relation between the allure of brain imaging and dualism. In the following three studies, laypersons rated both fictional research descriptions and real science news articles accompanied by brain scans, bar charts, or photographs. Across 988 participants, we found little evidence of neuroimaging's seductive allure or of its relation to self-professed dualistic beliefs. These results, taken together with other recent null findings, suggest that brain images are less powerful than has been argued.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23879877     DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_00407

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  9 in total

1.  Empirical neuroenchantment: from reading minds to thinking critically.

Authors:  Sabrina S Ali; Michael Lifshitz; Amir Raz
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 3.169

2.  The selective allure of neuroscientific explanations.

Authors:  Nicholas Scurich; Adam Shniderman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-10       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Media reporting of neuroscience depends on timing, topic and newspaper type.

Authors:  Nienke M van Atteveldt; Sandra I van Aalderen-Smeets; Carina Jacobi; Nel Ruigrok
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Taking an educational psychology course improves neuroscience literacy but does not reduce belief in neuromyths.

Authors:  Soo-Hyun Im; Joo-Yun Cho; Janet M Dubinsky; Sashank Varma
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Does Watching a Play about the Teenage Brain Affect Attitudes toward Young Offenders?

Authors:  Robert Blakey
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-06-09

6.  The effect of abstract versus concrete framing on judgments of biological and psychological bases of behavior.

Authors:  Nancy S Kim; Samuel G B Johnson; Woo-Kyoung Ahn; Joshua Knobe
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2017-03-20

7.  Reconciling the opposing effects of neurobiological evidence on criminal sentencing judgments.

Authors:  Corey H Allen; Karina Vold; Gidon Felsen; Jennifer S Blumenthal-Barby; Eyal Aharoni
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-18       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Neuroscientific evidence in the courtroom: a review.

Authors:  Darby Aono; Gideon Yaffe; Hedy Kober
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2019-10-22

9.  Public misconceptions about dyslexia: The role of intuitive psychology.

Authors:  Iris Berent; Melanie Platt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.