Literature DB >> 23878121

Overview of reviews in child health: evidence synthesis and the knowledge base for a specific population.

Denise Thomson1, Michelle Foisy, Marta Oleszczuk, Aireen Wingert, Annabritt Chisholm, Lisa Hartling.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Overviews of reviews are an evolving form of evidence synthesis. The Cochrane Child Health Field has been producing overviews since 2006, during which time the methods that have been used have changed, both due to the development of guidance within The Cochrane Collaboration and to the decisions made by individual author teams. This paper studies the first 29 overviews published in EBCH.
OBJECTIVES: To describe some aspects of the approaches taken in EBCH overviews to producing evidence syntheses relevant to the healthcare needs of children; to highlight the contribution that overviews can make to the knowledge base for treatment for a particular population.
METHODS: Data was extracted on: whether the overview included systematic review (SR) data only, or also data from individual trials not present in the included SRs; name(s) of the Cochrane Review Group (CRG) that prepared the included SRs; topics of the overviews as compared to the topics of the included reviews; age-subgroup analyses presented in the overviews.
RESULTS: In 23 overviews, all published in 2012, the authors included trial data as well as SR data; two overviews addressed conditions not explicitly addressed by the included reviews; three overviews included pre-specified age-subgroup analyses. DISCUSSION: The aim of clinical relevance has been achieved by means such as: drawing from reviews produced by multiple CRGs; using SR evidence to explore clinically relevant topics that may not match exactly with the topics covered by the SRs; ensuring that the evidence in overviews is as up to date as possible by redoing searches and including trials not incorporated in the included SRs; and, where permitted by the data, using age-subgroup analyses to present the data in a way which matches the stages of childhood development.
CONCLUSION: Overview authors are dependent on the nature of the data and methods reported in the included SRs. This suggests a need for further study about how SRs could be conducted in order to facilitate the conduct of overviews.
Copyright © 2013 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  clinical epidemiology; evidence‐based medicine; overviews; paediatrics; systematic reviews

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23878121     DOI: 10.1002/ebch.1897

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evid Based Child Health        ISSN: 1557-6272


  9 in total

Review 1.  What guidance is available for researchers conducting overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions? A scoping review and qualitative metasummary.

Authors:  Michelle Pollock; Ricardo M Fernandes; Lorne A Becker; Robin Featherstone; Lisa Hartling
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2016-11-14

2.  An introduction to overviews of reviews: planning a relevant research question and objective for an overview.

Authors:  Harriet Hunt; Alex Pollock; Pauline Campbell; Lise Estcourt; Ginny Brunton
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2018-03-01

3.  Toward a comprehensive evidence map of overview of systematic review methods: paper 2-risk of bias assessment; synthesis, presentation and summary of the findings; and assessment of the certainty of the evidence.

Authors:  Carole Lunny; Sue E Brennan; Steve McDonald; Joanne E McKenzie
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2018-10-12

4.  A decision tool to help researchers make decisions about including systematic reviews in overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions.

Authors:  Michelle Pollock; Ricardo M Fernandes; Amanda S Newton; Shannon D Scott; Lisa Hartling
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2019-01-22

5.  Network meta-analysis of randomised trials of pharmacological, psychotherapeutic, exercise and collaborative care interventions for depressive symptoms in patients with coronary artery disease: hybrid systematic review of systematic reviews protocol.

Authors:  Frank Doyle; Kenneth Freedland; Robert Carney; Peter de Jonge; Chris Dickens; Susanne Pedersen; Jan Sorensen; Martin Dempster
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2019-03-16

6.  The impact of different inclusion decisions on the comprehensiveness and complexity of overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions.

Authors:  Michelle Pollock; Ricardo M Fernandes; Amanda S Newton; Shannon D Scott; Lisa Hartling
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2019-01-11

7.  An evaluation of harvest plots to display results of meta-analyses in overviews of reviews: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Katelynn Crick; Aireen Wingert; Katrina Williams; Ricardo M Fernandes; Denise Thomson; Lisa Hartling
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 4.615

Review 8.  Toward a comprehensive evidence map of overview of systematic review methods: paper 1-purpose, eligibility, search and data extraction.

Authors:  Carole Lunny; Sue E Brennan; Steve McDonald; Joanne E McKenzie
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2017-11-21

Review 9.  Selecting and implementing overview methods: implications from five exemplar overviews.

Authors:  Alex Pollock; Pauline Campbell; Ginny Brunton; Harriet Hunt; Lise Estcourt
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2017-07-18
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.