Literature DB >> 23877958

Conservation caring: measuring the influence of zoo visitors' connection to wildlife on pro-conservation behaviors.

Jeffrey C Skibins1, Robert B Powell.   

Abstract

Zoos in the 21st century are striving to make effective contributions to conservation. Although zoos are extremely popular and host over 600 million visitors worldwide, one challenge zoos face is how to effectively engage visitors and raise awareness and action for conservation. To this end, zoos commonly rely on charismatic megafauna, which have been shown to elicit a connection with zoo visitors. However, little is known about how to measure a connection to a species or how this connection may influence conservation behaviors. This study had two sequential objectives. The first was to develop a scale to measure visitors' connection to a species (Conservation Caring). The second was to investigate the relationship of Conservation Caring to pro-conservation behaviors, following a zoo experience. Pre- (n = 411) and post-visit (n = 452) responses were collected from three sites in order to assess the reliability and validity of a scale to measure Conservation Caring. Structural equation modeling was used to explore the relationship between Conservation Caring and pro-conservation behaviors. Conservation Caring was deemed a valid and reliable scale and was a strong predictor of species oriented behaviors (β = 0.62), for example, "adopting" an animal, but a weak predictor for biodiversity oriented behaviors (β = 0.07), for example, supporting sustainability policies. Results support the role zoos can play in fostering a connection to wildlife and stimulating pro-conservation behaviors. Additionally, visitors connected to a wide array of animals. On the basis of these results, zoos may recruit a wider assemblage of species as potential flagships.
© 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Keywords:  connection to wildlife; conservation psychology; flagship species; introduction; pro-conservation behaviors; structural equation modeling

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23877958     DOI: 10.1002/zoo.21086

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zoo Biol        ISSN: 0733-3188            Impact factor:   1.421


  4 in total

1.  Zooscape ecology: a conceptual analysis of zoos and landscape ecology.

Authors:  Daniel Bisgrove
Journal:  Landsc Ecol       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 5.043

Review 2.  What Is the Zoo Experience? How Zoos Impact a Visitor's Behaviors, Perceptions, and Conservation Efforts.

Authors:  Andrea M Godinez; Eduardo J Fernandez
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-07-30

3.  Visitor Attitudes Toward Little Penguins (Eudyptula minor) at Two Australian Zoos.

Authors:  Samantha J Chiew; Paul H Hemsworth; Vicky Melfi; Sally L Sherwen; Alicia Burns; Grahame J Coleman
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-02-11

4.  What's left in the tank? Identification of non-ascribed aquarium's coral collections with DNA barcodes as part of an integrated diagnostic approach.

Authors:  Luigi Colin; Daniel Abed-Navandi; Dalia A Conde; Jamie Craggs; Rita da Silva; Max Janse; Björn Källström; Alexander Pearce-Kelly; Chris Yesson
Journal:  Conserv Genet Resour       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 0.991

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.