Literature DB >> 23877955

The multiple causal pathways between performance measures' use and effects.

Damien Contandriopoulos1, François Champagne, Jean-Louis Denis.   

Abstract

In recent decades, there has been a growing interest in the design and implementation of systems using public reporting of performance measures to improve performance. In their simplest form, such interventions rest on the market-based logic of consumers using publicly released information to modify their behavior, thereby penalizing poor performers. However, evidence from large-scale efforts to use public reporting of performance measures as an instrumental performance improvement tool suggests that the causal mechanisms involved are much more complex. This article offers a typology of four different plausible causal pathways linking public reporting of performance measures and performance improvement. This typology rests on a variety of conceptual models and a review of available empirical evidence. We then use this typology to discuss the core elements that need to be taken into account in efforts to use public reporting of performance measures as a performance improvement tool.

Keywords:  conceptual model; hospital performance; performance reports; public use of performance reports

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23877955     DOI: 10.1177/1077558713496320

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care Res Rev        ISSN: 1077-5587            Impact factor:   3.929


  13 in total

1.  Impact of State Reporting Laws on Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infection Rates in U.S. Adult Intensive Care Units.

Authors:  Hangsheng Liu; Carolyn T A Herzig; Andrew W Dick; E Yoko Furuya; Elaine Larson; Julie Reagan; Monika Pogorzelska-Maziarz; Patricia W Stone
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-07-24       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Effects of the CMS' Public Reporting Program for Inpatient Psychiatric Facilities on Targeted and Nontargeted Safety: Differences Between For-Profits and Nonprofits.

Authors:  Morgan C Shields
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 3.929

3.  Understanding high and low patient experience scores in primary care: analysis of patients' survey data for general practices and individual doctors.

Authors:  Martin J Roberts; John L Campbell; Gary A Abel; Antoinette F Davey; Natasha L Elmore; Inocencio Maramba; Mary Carter; Marc N Elliott; Martin O Roland; Jenni A Burt
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2014-11-11

4.  Keys to successful implementation of a French national quality indicator in health care organizations: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Mathias Waelli; Marie-Léandre Gomez; Claude Sicotte; Adrian Zicari; Jean-Yves Bonnefond; Philippe Lorino; Etienne Minvielle
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 2.655

5.  Are performance indicators used for hospital quality management: a qualitative interview study amongst health professionals and quality managers in The Netherlands.

Authors:  Daan Botje; Guus Ten Asbroek; Thomas Plochg; Helen Anema; Dionne S Kringos; Claudia Fischer; Cordula Wagner; Niek S Klazinga
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 2.655

6.  Public reporting as a prescriptions quality improvement measure in primary care settings in China: variations in effects associated with diagnoses.

Authors:  Yuqing Tang; Chaojie Liu; Xinping Zhang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Investigating the meaning of 'good' or 'very good' patient evaluations of care in English general practice: a mixed methods study.

Authors:  Jenni Burt; Jenny Newbould; Gary Abel; Marc N Elliott; Julia Beckwith; Nadia Llanwarne; Natasha Elmore; Antoinette Davey; Chris Gibbons; John Campbell; Martin Roland
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-03-02       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  The Effect of Centers for Medicare and Medicaid's Inpatient Psychiatric Facility Quality Reporting Program on the Use of Restraint and Seclusion.

Authors:  Morgan C Shields; Alisa B Busch
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 3.178

9.  The German Quality Network Sepsis: study protocol for the evaluation of a quality collaborative on decreasing sepsis-related mortality in a quasi-experimental difference-in-differences design.

Authors:  Daniel Schwarzkopf; Hendrik Rüddel; Matthias Gründling; Christian Putensen; Konrad Reinhart
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2018-01-18       Impact factor: 7.327

10.  How do aggregated patient-reported outcome measures data stimulate health care improvement? A realist synthesis.

Authors:  Joanne Greenhalgh; Sonia Dalkin; Elizabeth Gibbons; Judy Wright; Jose Maria Valderas; David Meads; Nick Black
Journal:  J Health Serv Res Policy       Date:  2017-12-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.