BACKGROUND: Routine histopathological examination of gallbladder specimens is mainly performed to identify unexpected gallbladder carcinoma (GBC). This systematic review assesses the prevalence and characteristics of GBC in cholecystectomy specimens. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched for all articles reporting on the finding of GBC in cholecystectomy specimens. RESULTS: Of the 30 articles included, 20 were from Europe and the United States, and 10 were of Asian origin. In the Western studies, 276 cases of GBC were found in 61,542 specimens (median prevalence 0.4%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.3-0.6). Of these, 65% were expected pre- or intraoperatively. In the Asian studies, 344 cases of GBC were found in 37,365 specimens (median prevalence 1.2%, 95% CI 0.8-1.7). Of these, 45% were expected pre- or intraoperatively. In a subgroup analysis, identification of previously unexpected GBC affected treatment in only a minority of patients. In total, 72% of the patients received no further treatment and 32 patients (22%) received secondary surgery, of whom 15 patients survived at least 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: The histopathological finding of GBC after cholecystectomy appears to be a rare event. The prevalence of unexpected GBC was higher in Asian studies than in Western studies. The pre- and intraoperative sensitivity for this carcinoma is low. Moreover, the diagnosis of GBC at the time of histopathology is usually inconsequential. The results of this systematic review do not support routine histopathology of cholecystectomy specimens in clinical practice.
BACKGROUND: Routine histopathological examination of gallbladder specimens is mainly performed to identify unexpected gallbladder carcinoma (GBC). This systematic review assesses the prevalence and characteristics of GBC in cholecystectomy specimens. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched for all articles reporting on the finding of GBC in cholecystectomy specimens. RESULTS: Of the 30 articles included, 20 were from Europe and the United States, and 10 were of Asian origin. In the Western studies, 276 cases of GBC were found in 61,542 specimens (median prevalence 0.4%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.3-0.6). Of these, 65% were expected pre- or intraoperatively. In the Asian studies, 344 cases of GBC were found in 37,365 specimens (median prevalence 1.2%, 95% CI 0.8-1.7). Of these, 45% were expected pre- or intraoperatively. In a subgroup analysis, identification of previously unexpected GBC affected treatment in only a minority of patients. In total, 72% of the patients received no further treatment and 32 patients (22%) received secondary surgery, of whom 15 patients survived at least 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: The histopathological finding of GBC after cholecystectomy appears to be a rare event. The prevalence of unexpected GBC was higher in Asian studies than in Western studies. The pre- and intraoperative sensitivity for this carcinoma is low. Moreover, the diagnosis of GBC at the time of histopathology is usually inconsequential. The results of this systematic review do not support routine histopathology of cholecystectomy specimens in clinical practice.
Authors: P Antonakis; N Alexakis; D Mylonaki; E Leandros; M M Konstadoulakis; G Zografos; G Androulakis Journal: Eur J Surg Oncol Date: 2003-05 Impact factor: 4.424
Authors: Jürgen Feisthammel; Konrad Schoppmeyer; Joachim Mössner; Manfred Schulze; Karel Caca; Marcus Wiedmann Journal: Am J Clin Oncol Date: 2007-06 Impact factor: 2.339
Authors: B J G A Corten; S Alexander; P H van Zwam; W K G Leclercq; R M H Roumen; G D Slooter Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2018-08-21 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: F Basak; M Hasbahceci; T Canbak; A Sisik; A Acar; M Yucel; G Bas; O Alimoglu Journal: Ann R Coll Surg Engl Date: 2016-02-29 Impact factor: 1.891
Authors: Vivian P Bastiaenen; Bartholomeus Jga Corten; Elise Aj de Savornin Lohman; Joske de Jonge; Anne C Kraima; Hilko A Swank; Jaap Lp van Vliet; Gijs Jd van Acker; Anna Aw van Geloven; Klaas H In 't Hof; Lianne Koens; Philip R de Reuver; Charles C van Rossem; Gerrit D Slooter; Pieter J Tanis; Valeska Terpstra; Marcel Gw Dijkgraaf; Willem A Bemelman Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2019-12-23 Impact factor: 2.692