UNLABELLED: Very low birth weight (VLBW) infants frequently receive analgesia and/or sedation for painful procedures and mechanical ventilation to avoid negative stress. Yet, concerns remain regarding potential adverse long-term effects of these drugs on VLBW infants' neurocognitive outcome. Recent studies have shown that less invasive surfactant application (LISA) and early nasal CPAP treatment reduce the need for mechanical ventilation and painful procedures. Therefore, these measures might also reduce the application of analgesic and/or sedative drugs in VLBW infants. To evaluate this hypothesis and to identify potential changes in analgesic treatment concepts in recent years, we retrospectively analyzed data on analgesia and sedation, respiratory support, and the method of surfactant application in VLBW infants enrolled in the German Neonatal Network (GNN) trial between 2003 and 2009 (period 1) and compared it with data from infants participating in GNN in 2010 (period 2). In both periods, about one third of all infants were treated with analgesic and/or sedative drugs using a wide variety of substances. The administration of novel drugs such as propofol, sufentanil, or intravenous paracetamol was higher in 2010 (6.7 vs. 12.2 %). Infants who were treated with CPAP only received significantly less analgesic/sedative medication than infants who were mechanically ventilated (12 vs. 65 %, p=<0.001). Similarly, infants treated with LISA received less analgesic or sedative drugs as compared to infants who received surfactant via endotracheal intubation (36 vs. 63 %, p=0.001). CONCLUSION: Although both avoidances of mechanical ventilation and less invasive surfactant application are associated with reduced analgesic or sedative treatment, the percentage of VLBW infants who received analgesia and/or sedation remained unchanged in Germany in recent years.
UNLABELLED: Very low birth weight (VLBW) infants frequently receive analgesia and/or sedation for painful procedures and mechanical ventilation to avoid negative stress. Yet, concerns remain regarding potential adverse long-term effects of these drugs on VLBW infants' neurocognitive outcome. Recent studies have shown that less invasive surfactant application (LISA) and early nasal CPAP treatment reduce the need for mechanical ventilation and painful procedures. Therefore, these measures might also reduce the application of analgesic and/or sedative drugs in VLBW infants. To evaluate this hypothesis and to identify potential changes in analgesic treatment concepts in recent years, we retrospectively analyzed data on analgesia and sedation, respiratory support, and the method of surfactant application in VLBW infants enrolled in the German Neonatal Network (GNN) trial between 2003 and 2009 (period 1) and compared it with data from infants participating in GNN in 2010 (period 2). In both periods, about one third of all infants were treated with analgesic and/or sedative drugs using a wide variety of substances. The administration of novel drugs such as propofol, sufentanil, or intravenous paracetamol was higher in 2010 (6.7 vs. 12.2 %). Infants who were treated with CPAP only received significantly less analgesic/sedative medication than infants who were mechanically ventilated (12 vs. 65 %, p=<0.001). Similarly, infants treated with LISA received less analgesic or sedative drugs as compared to infants who received surfactant via endotracheal intubation (36 vs. 63 %, p=0.001). CONCLUSION: Although both avoidances of mechanical ventilation and less invasive surfactant application are associated with reduced analgesic or sedative treatment, the percentage of VLBW infants who received analgesia and/or sedation remained unchanged in Germany in recent years.
Authors: Angela Kribs; C Härtel; E Kattner; M Vochem; H Küster; J Möller; D Müller; H Segerer; C Wieg; C Gebauer; W Nikischin; A v d Wense; E Herting; B Roth; W Göpel Journal: Klin Padiatr Date: 2010-01-18 Impact factor: 1.349
Authors: Joke de Graaf; Richard A van Lingen; Abraham J Valkenburg; Nynke Weisglas-Kuperus; Liesbeth Groot Jebbink; Barbara Wijnberg-Williams; Kanwaljeet J S Anand; Dick Tibboel; Monique van Dijk Journal: Pain Date: 2012-12-20 Impact factor: 6.961
Authors: K J S Anand; R Whit Hall; Nirmala Desai; Barbara Shephard; Lena L Bergqvist; Thomas E Young; Elaine M Boyle; Ricardo Carbajal; Vinod K Bhutani; Mary Beth Moore; Shari S Kronsberg; Bruce A Barton Journal: Lancet Date: 2004-05-22 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Ruth E Grunau; Michael F Whitfield; Julianne Petrie-Thomas; Anne R Synnes; Ivan L Cepeda; Adi Keidar; Marilyn Rogers; Margot Mackay; Philippa Hubber-Richard; Debra Johannesen Journal: Pain Date: 2009-05 Impact factor: 6.961
Authors: Laura Moschino; Viraraghavan Vadakkencherry Ramaswamy; Irwin Karl Marcel Reiss; Eugenio Baraldi; Charles Christoph Roehr; Sinno Henricus Paulus Simons Journal: Pediatr Res Date: 2022-06-02 Impact factor: 3.756
Authors: Mohamed E Abdel-Latif; Peter G Davis; Kevin I Wheeler; Antonio G De Paoli; Peter A Dargaville Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2021-05-10
Authors: Robert B Flint; Floor van Beek; Peter Andriessen; Luc J Zimmermann; Kian D Liem; Irwin K M Reiss; Ronald de Groot; Dick Tibboel; David M Burger; Sinno H P Simons Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2018-04-17 Impact factor: 4.335