PURPOSE: Abnormalities of aortic surface and aortic diameter can be related to cardiovascular disease and aortic aneurysm. Computer-based aortic segmentation and measurement may aid physicians in related disease diagnosis. This paper presents a fully automated algorithm for aorta segmentation in low-dose non-contrast CT images. METHODS: The original non-contrast CT scan images as well as their pre-computed anatomy label maps are used to locate the aorta and identify its surface. First a seed point is located inside the aortic lumen. Then, a cylindrical model is progressively fitted to the 3D image space to track the aorta centerline. Finally, the aortic surface is located based on image intensity information. This algorithm has been trained and tested on 359 low-dose non-contrast CT images from VIA-ELCAP and LIDC public image databases. Twenty images were used for training to obtain the optimal set of parameters, while the remaining images were used for testing. The segmentation result has been evaluated both qualitatively and quantitatively. Sixty representative testing images were used to establish a partial ground truth by manual marking on several axial image slices. RESULTS: Compared to ground truth marking, the segmentation result had a mean Dice Similarity Coefficient of 0.933 (maximum 0.963 and minimum 0.907). The average boundary distance between manual segmentation and automatic segmentation was 1.39 mm with a maximum of 1.79 mm and a minimum of 0.83 mm. CONCLUSION: Both qualitative and quantitative evaluations have shown that the presented algorithm is able to accurately segment the aorta in low-dose non-contrast CT images.
PURPOSE: Abnormalities of aortic surface and aortic diameter can be related to cardiovascular disease and aortic aneurysm. Computer-based aortic segmentation and measurement may aid physicians in related disease diagnosis. This paper presents a fully automated algorithm for aorta segmentation in low-dose non-contrast CT images. METHODS: The original non-contrast CT scan images as well as their pre-computed anatomy label maps are used to locate the aorta and identify its surface. First a seed point is located inside the aortic lumen. Then, a cylindrical model is progressively fitted to the 3D image space to track the aorta centerline. Finally, the aortic surface is located based on image intensity information. This algorithm has been trained and tested on 359 low-dose non-contrast CT images from VIA-ELCAP and LIDC public image databases. Twenty images were used for training to obtain the optimal set of parameters, while the remaining images were used for testing. The segmentation result has been evaluated both qualitatively and quantitatively. Sixty representative testing images were used to establish a partial ground truth by manual marking on several axial image slices. RESULTS: Compared to ground truth marking, the segmentation result had a mean Dice Similarity Coefficient of 0.933 (maximum 0.963 and minimum 0.907). The average boundary distance between manual segmentation and automatic segmentation was 1.39 mm with a maximum of 1.79 mm and a minimum of 0.83 mm. CONCLUSION: Both qualitative and quantitative evaluations have shown that the presented algorithm is able to accurately segment the aorta in low-dose non-contrast CT images.
Authors: Ivana Isgum; Marius Staring; Annemarieke Rutten; Mathias Prokop; Max A Viergever; Bram van Ginneken Journal: IEEE Trans Med Imaging Date: 2009-01-06 Impact factor: 10.048
Authors: Stephanie A Schwartz; Mihra S Taljanovic; Stephen Smyth; Michael J O'Brien; Lee F Rogers Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2007-01 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Samuel G Armato; Geoffrey McLennan; Luc Bidaut; Michael F McNitt-Gray; Charles R Meyer; Anthony P Reeves; Binsheng Zhao; Denise R Aberle; Claudia I Henschke; Eric A Hoffman; Ella A Kazerooni; Heber MacMahon; Edwin J R Van Beeke; David Yankelevitz; Alberto M Biancardi; Peyton H Bland; Matthew S Brown; Roger M Engelmann; Gary E Laderach; Daniel Max; Richard C Pais; David P Y Qing; Rachael Y Roberts; Amanda R Smith; Adam Starkey; Poonam Batrah; Philip Caligiuri; Ali Farooqi; Gregory W Gladish; C Matilda Jude; Reginald F Munden; Iva Petkovska; Leslie E Quint; Lawrence H Schwartz; Baskaran Sundaram; Lori E Dodd; Charles Fenimore; David Gur; Nicholas Petrick; John Freymann; Justin Kirby; Brian Hughes; Alessi Vande Casteele; Sangeeta Gupte; Maha Sallamm; Michael D Heath; Michael H Kuhn; Ekta Dharaiya; Richard Burns; David S Fryd; Marcos Salganicoff; Vikram Anand; Uri Shreter; Stephen Vastagh; Barbara Y Croft Journal: Med Phys Date: 2011-02 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Leon Lenchik; Laura Heacock; Ashley A Weaver; Robert D Boutin; Tessa S Cook; Jason Itri; Christopher G Filippi; Rao P Gullapalli; James Lee; Marianna Zagurovskaya; Tara Retson; Kendra Godwin; Joey Nicholson; Ponnada A Narayana Journal: Acad Radiol Date: 2019-08-10 Impact factor: 3.173
Authors: Lewis D Hahn; Gabriel Mistelbauer; Kai Higashigaito; Martin Koci; Martin J Willemink; Anna M Sailer; Michael Fischbein; Dominik Fleischmann Journal: Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging Date: 2020-06-25
Authors: Fabiola Bezerra de Carvalho Macruz; Charles Lu; Julia Strout; Angelo Takigami; Rupert Brooks; Sean Doyle; Min Yun; Varun Buch; Sandeep Hedgire; Brian Ghoshhajra Journal: Radiol Artif Intell Date: 2022-02-23
Authors: Zahra Sedghi Gamechi; Andres M Arias-Lorza; Zaigham Saghir; Daniel Bos; Marleen de Bruijne Journal: Med Phys Date: 2021-10-29 Impact factor: 4.506