Literature DB >> 23877014

Radiation therapy for pelvic lymph node metastasis from uterine cervical cancer.

Masaharu Hata1, Izumi Koike, Etsuko Miyagi, Reiko Numazaki, Mikiko Asai-Sato, Takeo Kasuya, Hisashi Kaizu, Tonika Matsui, Fumiki Hirahara, Tomio Inoue.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of radiation therapy for pelvic lymph node metastasis from uterine cervical cancer and identify an optimal radiation regimen.
METHODS: A total of 111 metastatic pelvic lymph nodes, ranging from 11 to 56 mm (median, 25 mm) on CT/MRI, in 62 patients with uterine cervical cancer were treated initially with curative radiation therapy, with 46 patients receiving concurrent chemotherapy. Total radiation doses ranged from 45 to 61.2 Gy (median, 50.4 Gy) in 1.8-2 Gy (median, 1.8 Gy) fractions.
RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 33 months, 46 of the 62 patients survived. Only 2 irradiated lymph nodes, 24 and 28 mm in diameter, in 1 patient progressed after irradiation alone with 50.4 Gy in 1.8 Gy fractions. All 33 metastatic lymph nodes ≥ 30 mm in diameter were controlled by irradiation at a median dose of 55.8 Gy. The 3-year lymph node-progression free rates were 98.2% in all 62 patients and 98.0% in all 111 metastatic lymph nodes. Except for transient hematologic reactions, 2 patients developed grade ≥ 3 therapy-related toxicities, 1 with an ulcer and the other with perforation of the sigmoid colon. In addition, 2 patients experienced ileus after irradiation.
CONCLUSIONS: Radiation therapy effectively controlled pelvic lymph node metastases in patients with uterine cervical cancer, with most nodes <24 mm in diameter controlled by total doses of 50.4 Gy in 1.8 Gy fractions and larger nodes controlled by 55.8 Gy, particularly with concurrent chemotherapy. Higher doses to metastatic lymph nodes may increase intestinal toxicities.
© 2013.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cervical cancer; Pelvic lymph node metastasis; Radiation therapy; Uterine cervix

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23877014     DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.07.085

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  9 in total

1.  Whether individualized dose escalation should be recommended for lymph nodes with different sizes in the definitive radiotherapy of cervical cancer?

Authors:  Xiaojuan Lv; Huiting Rao; Tao Feng; Chufan Wu; Hanmei Lou
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2022-10-20       Impact factor: 4.309

2.  COVID-19 Pandemic Impact on Surgical Treatment Methods for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: A Population-Based Study in Romania.

Authors:  Alin Popescu; Marius Craina; Stelian Pantea; Catalin Pirvu; Daniela Radu; Iosif Marincu; Felix Bratosin; Iulia Bogdan; Samer Hosin; Cosmin Citu; Elena Bernad; Radu Neamtu; Catalin Dumitru; Adelina Geanina Mocanu; Adrian Gluhovschi
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-28

3.  Details of recurrence sites after definitive radiation therapy for cervical cancer.

Authors:  Reiko Kobayashi; Hideomi Yamashita; Kae Okuma; Kuni Ohtomo; Keiichi Nakagawa
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2015-10-08       Impact factor: 4.401

4.  Patterns of definitive radiotherapy practice for cervical cancer in South Korea: a survey endorsed by the Korean Radiation Oncology Group (KROG 20-06).

Authors:  Nalee Kim; Won Park
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2021-05       Impact factor: 4.401

Review 5.  Treatment Strategies and Prognostic Factors of 2018 FIGO Stage IIIC Cervical Cancer: A Review.

Authors:  Fengying Qin; Huiting Pang; Tao Yu; Yahong Luo; Yue Dong
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec

6.  Prognostic factors of dose-response relationship for nodal control in metastatic lymph nodes of cervical cancer patients undergoing definitive radiotherapy with concurrent chemotherapy.

Authors:  Won Hee Lee; Gwi Eon Kim; Yong Bae Kim
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 4.756

7.  SPOP promotes cervical cancer progression by inducing the movement of PD-1 away from PD-L1 in spatial localization.

Authors:  Jiangchun Wu; Yong Wu; Qinhao Guo; Xiaohua Wu; Jun Zhu; Xingzhu Ju; Siyu Chen; Simin Wang
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2022-08-30       Impact factor: 8.440

8.  Who can benefit from a lymph node boost in definitive chemoradiotherapy for node-positive cervical cancer: an evaluation of nodal failure in patients without nodal boost.

Authors:  Haeyoung Kim; Won Park; Won Kyung Cho
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2020-05-22       Impact factor: 2.724

9.  Clinical significance of lymph node size in locally advanced cervical cancer treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  Jinju Oh; Ki Ho Seol; Youn Seok Choi; Jeong Won Lee; Jin Young Bae
Journal:  Yeungnam Univ J Med       Date:  2019-02-21
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.