Literature DB >> 23876784

Is the length of time in acute burn surgery associated with poorer outcomes?

Jolene Lim1, Sarah Liew1, Hayley Chan1, Teresa Jackson2, Sally Burrows3, Dale W Edgar4, Fiona M Wood5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Acute wound closure surgery improves outcomes, after burn particularly mortality, but also imposes physiological stress on the patient. The duration of surgery is associated with adverse outcomes in other populations. This study aimed to examine if extended acute burn surgery duration was associated with poorer in-hospital outcomes.
METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included adult burn patients who required a single wound closure surgery at Royal Perth Hospital between 2004 and 2011. Multivariable regression analyses were used to assess the influence of patient and injury factors on surgery duration and length of stay (LOS).
RESULTS: Surgery duration independently increased LOS (incidence rate ratio [IRR]=1.004, p<0.001). This translates to a predicted 13% increase in LOS for a 30min increase in surgery 'knife to skin' time. Total body surface area (TBSA) was identified as a significant predictor of surgery duration (IRR=1.047, p<0.001), estimating that a 10% TBSA increase results in a 59% increase in surgery duration.
CONCLUSION: The results show that surgery duration is associated with LOS after adjusting for size of burn and other factors. The study justifies the need to explore strategies to reduce acute burn surgery duration.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd and ISBI. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acute surgery; Autologous cell spray; Length of stay; Theatre time

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23876784     DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2013.06.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Burns        ISSN: 0305-4179            Impact factor:   2.744


  9 in total

1.  Temporary coverage of burns with a xenograft and sequential excision, compared with total early excision and autograft.

Authors:  M Elmasry; I Steinvall; J Thorfinn; P Olofsson; A H Abbas; I Abdelrahman; O A Adly; F Sjoberg
Journal:  Ann Burns Fire Disasters       Date:  2016-09-30

2.  The impact of operative time and hypothermia in acute burn surgery.

Authors:  N Ziolkowski; A D Rogers; W Xiong; B Hong; S Patel; B Trull; M G Jeschke
Journal:  Burns       Date:  2017-10-28       Impact factor: 2.744

3.  Real-Time Prediction for Burn Length of Stay Via Median Residual Hospital Length of Stay Methodology.

Authors:  Sandra L Taylor; Soman Sen; David G Greenhalgh; MaryBeth Lawless; Terese Curri; Tina L Palmieri
Journal:  J Burn Care Res       Date:  2016 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.845

4.  A Comparative Study of the ReCell® Device and Autologous Spit-Thickness Meshed Skin Graft in the Treatment of Acute Burn Injuries.

Authors:  James Hill Holmes Iv; Joseph A Molnar; Jeffrey E Carter; James Hwang; Bruce A Cairns; Booker T King; David J Smith; C Wayne Cruse; Kevin N Foster; Michael D Peck; Rajiv Sood; Michael J Feldman; Marion H Jordan; David W Mozingo; David G Greenhalgh; Tina L Palmieri; John A Griswold; Sharmila Dissanaike; William L Hickerson
Journal:  J Burn Care Res       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 1.845

5.  A pilot multi-centre prospective randomised controlled trial of RECELL for the treatment of venous leg ulcers.

Authors:  Paul D Hayes; Keith G Harding; Susan M Johnson; Charles McCollum; Luc Téot; Kevin Mercer; David Russell
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2020-02-26       Impact factor: 3.315

6.  Effects of a hot ambient operating theatre on manual dexterity, psychological and physiological parameters in staff during a simulated burn surgery.

Authors:  Zehra Palejwala; Karen Wallman; M K Ward; Cheryl Yam; Tessa Maroni; Sharon Parker; Fiona Wood
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Cost-Effectiveness of the Use of Autologous Cell Harvesting Device Compared to Standard of Care for Treatment of Severe Burns in the United States.

Authors:  Stacey Kowal; Eliza Kruger; Pinar Bilir; James H Holmes; William Hickerson; Kevin Foster; Scott Nystrom; Jeremiah Sparks; Narayan Iyer; Katie Bush; Andrew Quick
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 3.845

8.  Early aseptic loosening of the Tritanium primary acetabular component with screw fixation.

Authors:  William J Long; Samir Nayyar; Kevin K Chen; David Novikov; Roy I Davidovitch; Jonathan M Vigdorchik
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2018-01-02

9.  Relationship Between Patient Characteristics and Number of Procedures as well as Length of Stay for Patients Surviving Severe Burn Injuries: Analysis of the American Burn Association National Burn Repository.

Authors:  Eliza Kruger; Stacey Kowal; S Pinar Bilir; Eileen Han; Kevin Foster
Journal:  J Burn Care Res       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 1.845

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.