Literature DB >> 23876674

Unifying and generalizing the two strands of evo-devo.

Kevin J Parsons1, R Craig Albertson.   

Abstract

The emergence of evo-devo has had profound effects on how we study evolution. However, evo-devo research has tended to involve two general approaches, one being mechanistic and typological with a focus on simple, bimodal phenotypes, and the other being quantitative and focusing on multidimensional phenotypes without an understanding of underlying genetic mechanisms. Here, we suggest that, given recent technological advances in genomics, molecular biology, and morphometrics, evo-devo is poised for a reconciliation through which the field will realize far greater explanatory potential with respect to the patterns and processes that underlie adaptive phenotypic divergence. With this in mind, we review the recent literature and put forward a generalized evo-devo approach that is suitable for studies of quantitative traits in a range of taxa.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23876674     DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2013.06.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol        ISSN: 0169-5347            Impact factor:   17.712


  14 in total

1.  Genetic basis of continuous variation in the levels and modular inheritance of pigmentation in cichlid fishes.

Authors:  R Craig Albertson; Kara E Powder; Yinan Hu; Kaitlin P Coyle; Reade B Roberts; Kevin J Parsons
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 6.185

2.  Geometric morphometrics of microscopic animals as exemplified by model nematodes.

Authors:  Tobias Theska; Bogdan Sieriebriennikov; Sara S Wighard; Michael S Werner; Ralf J Sommer
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 13.491

Review 3.  Speciation through the lens of biomechanics: locomotion, prey capture and reproductive isolation.

Authors:  Timothy E Higham; Sean M Rogers; R Brian Langerhans; Heather A Jamniczky; George V Lauder; William J Stewart; Christopher H Martin; David N Reznick
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Cichlid fishes as a model to understand normal and clinical craniofacial variation.

Authors:  Kara E Powder; R Craig Albertson
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 3.582

5.  Conserved but flexible modularity in the zebrafish skull: implications for craniofacial evolvability.

Authors:  Kevin J Parsons; Young H Son; Amelie Crespel; Davide Thambithurai; Shaun Killen; Matthew P Harris; R Craig Albertson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 6.  Making quantitative morphological variation from basic developmental processes: Where are we? The case of the Drosophila wing.

Authors:  Alexis Matamoro-Vidal; Isaac Salazar-Ciudad; David Houle
Journal:  Dev Dyn       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 3.780

7.  Hedgehog signaling mediates adaptive variation in a dynamic functional system in the cichlid feeding apparatus.

Authors:  Yinan Hu; R Craig Albertson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Nested Levels of Adaptive Divergence: The Genetic Basis of Craniofacial Divergence and Ecological Sexual Dimorphism.

Authors:  Kevin J Parsons; Jason Wang; Graeme Anderson; R Craig Albertson
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 3.154

9.  Embryonic and larval development in the Midas cichlid fish species flock (Amphilophus spp.): a new evo-devo model for the investigation of adaptive novelties and species differences.

Authors:  Claudius F Kratochwil; Maggie M Sefton; Axel Meyer
Journal:  BMC Dev Biol       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 1.978

Review 10.  Problems in Fish-to-Tetrapod Transition: Genetic Expeditions Into Old Specimens.

Authors:  Thomas W P Wood; Tetsuya Nakamura
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2018-07-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.