Literature DB >> 23876584

Perioperative outcomes for laparoscopic and robotic compared with open prostatectomy using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database.

Jen-Jane Liu1, Bryan G Maxwell, Periklis Panousis, Benjamin I Chung.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine contemporary outcomes of minimally invasive radical prostatectomy (MIRP) compared with open prostatectomy, using a national, prospective perioperative database reflecting diverse practice settings.
METHODS: The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried from 2005 to 2010 for laparoscopic or robotic prostatectomy (Current Procedural Terminology code 55866) and open retropubic prostatectomy (Current Procedural Terminology codes 55840, 55842, 55845). Perioperative outcomes examined were surgical and total operation duration, transfusion rates, length of stay, major morbidity (cardiovascular, pulmonary, renal, and infectious), and mortality.
RESULTS: The study identified 5319 radical prostatectomies: 4036 MIRP and 1283 open. Although operative time was significantly longer in the MIRP group, there were significantly fewer perioperative blood transfusions and shorter mean length of stay. Major postoperative morbidity and mortality were 5% in the MIRP group and 9% in the open group (P <.001). Age, body mass index, presence of medical comorbidities, and open surgical technique were all independently predictive of major complications and mortality on multivariate analysis.
CONCLUSION: In a nationwide database of diverse medical centers, MIRP was associated with longer operative time, but a significantly decreased rate of blood transfusions, length of stay, perioperative complication rate, and mortality compared with open prostatectomy. The minimally invasive surgical approach was independently associated with significantly fewer complications and deaths on multivariate analysis. Compared with other administrative databases that capture only inpatient events, the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program identifies complications up to 30 days postoperatively, providing more detailed characterization of complications after prostatectomy. These data reflect contemporary practice patterns and suggest that MIRP can be performed with low perioperative morbidity.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23876584     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.03.080

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  12 in total

1.  The impact of resident involvement in minimally-invasive urologic oncology procedures.

Authors:  Nedim Ruhotina; Julien Dagenais; Giorgio Gandaglia; Akshay Sood; Firas Abdollah; Steven L Chang; Jeffrey J Leow; Kola Olugbade; Arun Rai; Jesse D Sammon; Marianne Schmid; Briony Varda; Kevin C Zorn; Mani Menon; Adam S Kibel; Quoc-Dien Trinh
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Short-term perioperative outcomes of patients treated with radical cystectomy for bladder cancer included in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database.

Authors:  Giorgio Gandaglia; Briony Varda; Akshay Sood; Daniel Pucheril; Ramdev Konijeti; Jesse D Sammon; Shyam Sukumar; Mani Menon; Maxine Sun; Steven L Chang; Francesco Montorsi; Adam S Kibel; Quoc-Dien Trinh
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  Patient comorbidity predicts hospital length of stay after robot-assisted prostatectomy.

Authors:  Aaron M Potretzke; Eric H Kim; Brent A Knight; Barrett G Anderson; Alyssa M Park; R Sherburne Figenshau; Sam B Bhayani
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2016-04-15

4.  Risk factors of perioperative complications in patients undergoing radical retropubic prostatectomy: A ten-year experience.

Authors:  Xiao-Jun Liu; Liang Liu; Kun Chang; Ding-Wei Ye; Yong-Fa Zheng; Xu-Dong Yao
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2017-06-06

5.  Is age an independent risk factor for medical complications following minimally invasive radical prostatectomy? An evaluation of contemporary American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement (ACS-NSQIP) data.

Authors:  Lawrence M Dagrosa; Johann P Ingimarsson; Ivan P Gorlov; John H Higgins; Elias S Hyams
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2016-06-04

6.  Postoperative mortality 90 days after robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy and retropubic radical prostatectomy: a nationwide population-based study.

Authors:  Johan Björklund; Yasin Folkvaljon; Alexander Cole; Stefan Carlsson; David Robinson; Stacy Loeb; Pär Stattin; Olof Akre
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2016-02-15       Impact factor: 5.588

7.  Delivering High-Quality Cancer Care: The Critical Role of Quality Measurement.

Authors:  Tracy Spinks; Patricia A Ganz; George W Sledge; Laura Levit; James A Hayman; Timothy J Eberlein; Thomas W Feeley
Journal:  Healthc (Amst)       Date:  2014-03-01

8.  Urovision 2020: The future of urology.

Authors:  Vivek Venkatramani
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2015 Apr-Jun

Review 9.  Optimal pain management for radical prostatectomy surgery: what is the evidence?

Authors:  Grish P Joshi; Thomas Jaschinski; Francis Bonnet; Henrik Kehlet
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 2.217

10.  Impact of prior abdominal surgery on the outcomes after robotic - assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: single center experience.

Authors:  Nozomu Kishimoto; Tetsuya Takao; Gaku Yamamichi; Takuya Okusa; Ayumu Taniguchi; Koichi Tsutahara; Go Tanigawa; Seiji Yamaguchi
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2016 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.541

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.