Literature DB >> 23875882

Seven years of cranioplasty in a regional neurosurgical centre.

Ellie Broughton1, Louis Pobereskin, Peter C Whitfield.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: In recent years craniectomy has been widely used in the management of traumatic brain injury and ischaemic stroke. The objective of this study was to evaluate the indications, techniques and outcomes for patients undergoing cranioplasty over a recent 7-year period in a geographically distinct population.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: An observational study was performed retrospectively, with review of case records from 2004 to 2011. Demographic, clinical and outcome data were collected, and complications were classified as major and minor. A multi-variant analysis was performed to identify patient and management factors that influenced outcome.
RESULTS: Data were collected on a total of 87 cranioplasty patients with a median age of 42 and a mean follow-up time of 3 years and 10 months. The main indications for craniectomy were trauma (46%), infection (19%) intracranial haemorrhage (15%), tumour (13%) and ischaemic stroke (6%). Eight percent of patients had a synchronous craniectomy and cranioplasty, 14% had cranioplasty within 3 months of craniectomy, 21% within 3-6 months, 35% within 6-12 months, 14% over 1 year and 8% over 2 years later. The most frequently implanted cranioplasty material was titanium (53%), followed by autologous bone (26%) and acrylic (15%). Administration of prophylactic antibiotics was recorded in 97% of cases. Major complications occurred in 20% of patients, including 2 deaths (2%), 5 extradural haemorrhages (6%) and 9 infections (10%). A further 10% of cases experienced minor or cosmetic complications.
CONCLUSIONS: Cranioplasty is often considered as a low-risk procedure following craniectomy. In our cohort, a 20% risk of major complications, including death, was identified. These findings contribute to the literature, emphasising that cranioplasty is a high-risk procedure. Whilst compelling reasons may guide the undertaking of craniectomy, it is essential that consideration is given to the significant subsequent risks of cranioplasty.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23875882     DOI: 10.3109/02688697.2013.815319

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0268-8697            Impact factor:   1.596


  14 in total

Review 1.  The storage of skull bone flaps for autologous cranioplasty: literature review.

Authors:  Vicente Mirabet; Daniel García; Nuria Yagüe; Luis Roberto Larrea; Cristina Arbona; Carlos Botella
Journal:  Cell Tissue Bank       Date:  2021-01-09       Impact factor: 1.522

2.  A Retrospective Study of Complications in Cranioplasty: 7-Year Period.

Authors:  S K Roy Chowdhury; Ashok Kumar; Prashant Kumar
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2020-11-23

3.  Cranioplasty complications and risk factors associated with bone flap resorption.

Authors:  Tor Brommeland; Pål Nicolay Rydning; Are Hugo Pripp; Eirik Helseth
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 2.953

4.  Fenestration of bone flap during interval autologous cranioplasty.

Authors:  Ha Son Nguyen; Ninh Doan; Christopher Wolfla; Glen Pollock
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2015-12-24

5.  Sudden Death Following Cranioplasty.

Authors:  Stephen Honeybul
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2016-02-29

6.  Adhesion sutures for seroma reduction in cranial reconstructions with polymethyl methacrylate prosthesis in patients undergoing decompressive craniectomy: A clinical trial.

Authors:  Juan Pablo Borges Rodrigues Maricevich; Auricelio Batista Cezar; Edilson Xavier de Oliveira; Jose Arthur Morais Veras E Silva; Renata Souza Maricevich; Nivaldo Sena Almeida; Hildo Rocha Cirne Azevedo-Filho
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2018-08-22

7.  Functional and aesthetic evaluation after cranial reconstruction with polymethyl methacrylate prostheses using low-cost 3D printing templates in patients with cranial defects secondary to decompressive craniectomies: A prospective study.

Authors:  Juan Pablo Borges Rodrigues Maricevich; Auricelio B Cezar-Junior; Edilson Xavier de Oliveira-Junior; Jose Arthur Morais Veras E Silva; Jorge Vicente Lopes da Silva; Amanda Amorin Nunes; Nivaldo S Almeida; Hildo Rocha Cirne Azevedo-Filho
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2019-01-15

8.  Which One Is Better to Reduce the Infection Rate, Early or Late Cranioplasty?

Authors:  Jae-Sang Oh; Kyeong-Seok Lee; Jai-Joon Shim; Seok-Mann Yoon; Jae-Won Doh; Hack-Gun Bae
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2016-09-08

9.  Never say never again: A bone graft infection due to a hornet sting, thirty-nine years after cranioplasty.

Authors:  Rosario Maugeri; Roberto G Giammalva; Francesca Graziano; Luigi Basile; Carlo Gulì; Antonella Giugno; Domenico G Iacopino
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2017-08-10

10.  Determinants of 30-day Morbidity in Adult Cranioplasty: An ACS-NSQIP Analysis of 697 Cases.

Authors:  Rachel E Armstrong; Marco F Ellis
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2019-12-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.