Literature DB >> 23875574

Components of working memory and visual selective attention.

Bryan R Burnham1, Matthew Sabia1, Catherine Langan1.   

Abstract

Load theory (Lavie, N., Hirst, A., De Fockert, J. W., & Viding, E. [2004]. Load theory of selective attention and cognitive control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 339-354.) proposes that control of attention depends on the amount and type of load that is imposed by current processing. Specifically, perceptual load should lead to efficient distractor rejection, whereas working memory load (dual-task coordination) should hinder distractor rejection. Studies support load theory's prediction that working memory load will lead to larger distractor effects; however, these studies used secondary tasks that required only verbal working memory and the central executive. The present study examined which other working memory components (visual, spatial, and phonological) influence visual selective attention. Subjects completed an attentional capture task alone (single-task) or while engaged in a working memory task (dual-task). Results showed that along with the central executive, visual and spatial working memory influenced selective attention, but phonological working memory did not. Specifically, attentional capture was larger when visual or spatial working memory was loaded, but phonological working memory load did not affect attentional capture. The results are consistent with load theory and suggest specific components of working memory influence visual selective attention. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2014 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23875574     DOI: 10.1037/a0033753

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  10 in total

Review 1.  Twenty years of load theory-Where are we now, and where should we go next?

Authors:  Gillian Murphy; John A Groeger; Ciara M Greene
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-10

2.  Mindfulness improves verbal learning and memory through enhanced encoding.

Authors:  Adam Lueke; Niloufar Lueke
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2019-11

3.  Selective memory disrupted in intra-modal dual-task encoding conditions.

Authors:  Alexander L M Siegel; Shawn T Schwartz; Alan D Castel
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2021-03-24

4.  A computer-based selective visual attention test for first-grade school children: design, development and psychometric properties.

Authors:  Farzaneh Yazdani; Malahat Akbarfahimi; Afsoon Hassani Mehraban; Shohreh Jalaei; Mohammad Torabi-Nami
Journal:  Med J Islam Repub Iran       Date:  2015-02-23

5.  Symbiosis of executive and selective attention in working memory.

Authors:  André Vandierendonck
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-08-08       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  A Hierarchical Model of Inhibitory Control.

Authors:  Jeggan Tiego; Renee Testa; Mark A Bellgrove; Christos Pantelis; Sarah Whittle
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-08-02

7.  Inhibition continues to guide search under concurrent visual working memory load.

Authors:  Zachary Hamblin-Frohman; Stefanie I Becker
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Do cognitive load and ADHD traits affect the tendency to prioritise social information in scenes?

Authors:  Astrid Priscilla Martinez-Cedillo; Kevin Dent; Tom Foulsham
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 2.138

9.  Working memory load and distraction: dissociable effects of visual maintenance and cognitive control.

Authors:  Nikos Konstantinou; Eleanor Beal; Jean-Remi King; Nilli Lavie
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  Learning to suppress a distractor is not affected by working memory load.

Authors:  Ya Gao; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2020-02
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.