Literature DB >> 2387507

Swallowed button batteries: is there a consensus on management?

J G Studley1, I P Linehan, A L Ogilvie, B L Dowling.   

Abstract

The optimum management of ingested button batteries was ascertained by postal questionnaire sent to 608 members of the endoscopic and paediatric sections of the British Society of Gastroenterology. Some 312 returns were suitable for analysis: 36.2% of the respondents were not concerned about ingested button batteries and gave no treatment, 6.4% used medical treatment, 48.4% removed them under certain circumstances, and 9% did not know how to manage the problem. Emetics and H2 antagonists or antacids were often used for batteries in the oesophagus, stomach, and duodenum and laxatives were commonly prescribed for batteries in the small and large bowel. Of the 48.4% who felt batteries should be removed under certain circumstances, 78%, 72%, and 48% extracted them from the oesophagus, stomach, and duodenum respectively within 24 hours of ingestion. The main reason for operative removal from the small and large bowel was failure of the battery to progress. Current management is therefore variable. Heavy metal poisoning may be occurring more frequently than is suggested in the published reports.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2387507      PMCID: PMC1378611          DOI: 10.1136/gut.31.8.867

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gut        ISSN: 0017-5749            Impact factor:   23.059


  23 in total

1.  Fatal complication from an alkaline battery foreign body in the esophagus.

Authors:  D S Blatnik; R J Toohill; R H Lehman
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1977 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.547

2.  Ingestion of button batteries: hazards and management.

Authors:  B Kiely; D Gill
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1986-08-02

3.  Management of children who have swallowed button batteries.

Authors:  T J David; A P Ferguson
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 3.791

4.  Mercury battery ingestion.

Authors:  D T Reilly
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1979-03-31

5.  Mercury battery ingestion.

Authors:  E A D'Sa Barros; A A D'Sa Barros
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1979-05-05

6.  Perforation of Meckel's diverticulum by an alkaline hearing aid battery.

Authors:  G A Willis; W C Ho
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1982-03-01       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  Health risks following ingestion of mercury and zinc air batteries.

Authors:  M Nolan; I Tucker
Journal:  Scand Audiol       Date:  1981

8.  Re: danger of small children swallowing hearing aid batteries.

Authors:  L Katz; M T Cooper
Journal:  J Otolaryngol       Date:  1978-10

9.  Esophageal perforation secondary to alkaline battery ingestion.

Authors:  C L Shabino; A N Feinberg
Journal:  JACEP       Date:  1979-09

Review 10.  Button battery ingestion: a case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  K M Kost; R S Shapiro
Journal:  J Otolaryngol       Date:  1987-08
View more
  4 in total

1.  Button cell in oesophagus: An unusual destructive foreign body a case report.

Authors:  Sanjiv Kakkar; Jugesh Makker
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2006-04

Review 2.  Oesophageal perforation after button battery ingestion.

Authors:  A C Gordon; M H Gough
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  Aspiration pneumonia and esophagotracheal fistula secondary to button battery ingestion.

Authors:  Delecia R LaFrance; James G Traylor; Long Jin
Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 2.007

4.  Button battery induced traumatic tracheoesophageal fistula: Case report and review of literature.

Authors:  Insaf Abdulkareem; Omayma M Sabir; Abdelaziz Elamin
Journal:  Sudan J Paediatr       Date:  2011
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.