Literature DB >> 23874359

Diagnostic performance of electronic syndromic surveillance systems in acute care: a systematic review.

M Kashiouris1, J C O'Horo, B W Pickering, V Herasevich.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Healthcare Electronic Syndromic Surveillance (ESS) is the systematic collection, analysis and interpretation of ongoing clinical data with subsequent dissemination of results, which aid clinical decision-making.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate, classify and analyze the diagnostic performance, strengths and limitations of existing acute care ESS systems. DATA SOURCES: All available to us studies in Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, CINAHL and Scopus databases, from as early as January 1972 through the first week of September 2012. STUDY SELECTION: Prospective and retrospective trials, examining the diagnostic performance of inpatient ESS and providing objective diagnostic data including sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values. DATA EXTRACTION: Two independent reviewers extracted diagnostic performance data on ESS systems, including clinical area, number of decision points, sensitivity and specificity. Positive and negative likelihood ratios were calculated for each healthcare ESS system. A likelihood matrix summarizing the various ESS systems performance was created.
RESULTS: The described search strategy yielded 1639 articles. Of these, 1497 were excluded on abstract information. After full text review, abstraction and arbitration with a third reviewer, 33 studies met inclusion criteria, reporting 102,611 ESS decision points. The yielded I2 was high (98.8%), precluding meta-analysis. Performance was variable, with sensitivities ranging from 21% -100% and specificities ranging from 5%-100%.
CONCLUSIONS: There is significant heterogeneity in the diagnostic performance of the available ESS implements in acute care, stemming from the wide spectrum of different clinical entities and ESS systems. Based on the results, we introduce a conceptual framework using a likelihood ratio matrix for evaluation and meaningful application of future, frontline clinical decision support systems.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alert; EMR; IC; computer systems; computer-assisted; computerized medical records systems; decision support systems; diagnostic; false; medical informatics applications; monitor; sniffers; surveillance

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23874359      PMCID: PMC3716308          DOI: 10.4338/ACI-2012-12-RA-0053

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Clin Inform        ISSN: 1869-0327            Impact factor:   2.342


  41 in total

1.  The surveillance of communicable diseases of national importance.

Authors:  A D LANGMUIR
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1963-01-24       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 2.  Diagnostic tests 4: likelihood ratios.

Authors:  Jonathan J Deeks; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-07-17

3.  Using artificial neural networks for classifying ICU patient states.

Authors:  M van Gils; H Jansen; K Nieminen; R Summers; P R Weller
Journal:  IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag       Date:  1997 Nov-Dec

4.  An artificial neural network system for diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in the accident and emergency department: evaluation and comparison with serum myoglobin measurements.

Authors:  R L Kennedy; R F Harrison; A M Burton; H S Fraser; W G Hamer; D MacArthur; R McAllum; D J Steedman
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 5.428

5.  Planning a public health surveillance system.

Authors:  S M Teutsch; S B Thacker
Journal:  Epidemiol Bull       Date:  1995-03

6.  Prospective evaluation of an EDB-based diagnostic program to be used in patients admitted to hospital with acute chest pain.

Authors:  J Jonsbu; O Aase; A Rollag; K Liestøl; J Erikssen
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 29.983

7.  Clinical diagnosis of ventilator associated pneumonia revisited: comparative validation using immediate post-mortem lung biopsies.

Authors:  N Fàbregas; S Ewig; A Torres; M El-Ebiary; J Ramirez; J P de La Bellacasa; T Bauer; H Cabello
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 9.139

8.  Randomized trial of automated, electronic monitoring to facilitate early detection of sepsis in the intensive care unit*.

Authors:  Michael H Hooper; Lisa Weavind; Arthur P Wheeler; Jason B Martin; Supriya Srinivasa Gowda; Matthew W Semler; Rachel M Hayes; Daniel W Albert; Norment B Deane; Hui Nian; Janos L Mathe; Andras Nadas; Janos Sztipanovits; Anne Miller; Gordon R Bernard; Todd W Rice
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 7.598

9.  Evaluating alert fatigue over time to EHR-based clinical trial alerts: findings from a randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Peter J Embi; Anthony C Leonard
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 10.  No role for quality scores in systematic reviews of diagnostic accuracy studies.

Authors:  Penny Whiting; Roger Harbord; Jos Kleijnen
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2005-05-26       Impact factor: 4.615

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Data elements and validation methods used for electronic surveillance of health care-associated infections: a systematic review.

Authors:  Kenrick D Cato; Bevin Cohen; Elaine Larson
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.918

2.  Differentiating infectious and noninfectious ventilator-associated complications: A new challenge.

Authors:  John C O'Horo; Rahul Kashyap; Ronaldo Sevilla Berrios; Vitaly Herasevich; Priya Sampathkumar
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 2.918

3.  Automating Quality Metrics in the Era of Electronic Medical Records: Digital Signatures for Ventilator Bundle Compliance.

Authors:  Haitao Lan; Charat Thongprayoon; Adil Ahmed; Vitaly Herasevich; Priya Sampathkumar; Ognjen Gajic; John C O'Horo
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-06-08       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  An automated clinical alert system for newly-diagnosed atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  David A Cook; Felicity Enders; Pedro J Caraballo; Rick A Nishimura; Farrell J Lloyd
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Testing modes of computerized sepsis alert notification delivery systems.

Authors:  Mikhail A Dziadzko; Andrew M Harrison; Ing C Tiong; Brian W Pickering; Pablo Moreno Franco; Vitaly Herasevich
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 2.796

Review 6.  Automated detection of hospital outbreaks: A systematic review of methods.

Authors:  Brice Leclère; David L Buckeridge; Pierre-Yves Boëlle; Pascal Astagneau; Didier Lepelletier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.