Literature DB >> 23873736

Backcasting the decline of a vulnerable Great Plains reproductive ecotype: identifying threats and conservation priorities.

Thomas A Worthington1, Shannon K Brewer, Timothy B Grabowski, Julia Mueller.   

Abstract

Conservation efforts for threatened or endangered species are challenging because the multi-scale factors that relate to their decline or inhibit their recovery are often unknown. To further exacerbate matters, the perceptions associated with the mechanisms of species decline are often viewed myopically rather than across the entire species range. We used over 80 years of fish presence data collected from the Great Plains and associated ecoregions of the United States, to investigate the relative influence of changing environmental factors on the historic and current truncated distributions of the Arkansas River shiner Notropis girardi. Arkansas River shiner represent a threatened reproductive ecotype considered especially well adapted to the harsh environmental extremes of the Great Plains. Historic (n = 163 records) and current (n = 47 records) species distribution models were constructed using a vector-based approach in MaxEnt by splitting the available data at a time when Arkansas River shiner dramatically declined. Discharge and stream order were significant predictors in both models; however, the shape of the relationship between the predictors and species presence varied between time periods. Drift distance (river fragment length available for ichthyoplankton downstream drift before meeting a barrier) was a more important predictor in the current model and indicated river segments 375-780 km had the highest probability of species presence. Performance for the historic and current models was high (area under the curve; AUC > 0.95); however, forecasting and backcasting to alternative time periods suggested less predictive power. Our results identify fragments that could be considered refuges for endemic plains fish species and we highlight significant environmental factors (e.g., discharge) that could be manipulated to aid recovery. Published 2013. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the U.S.A.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arkansas River shiner; Notropis girardi; altered flow regime; fragmentation; landscape change; species distribution model

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23873736     DOI: 10.1111/gcb.12329

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Glob Chang Biol        ISSN: 1354-1013            Impact factor:   10.863


  5 in total

1.  Organizing Environmental Flow Frameworks to Meet Hydropower Mitigation Needs.

Authors:  Ryan A McManamay; Shannon K Brewer; Henriette I Jager; Matthew J Troia
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2016-06-25       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Advancing Environmental Flow Science: Developing Frameworks for Altered Landscapes and Integrating Efforts Across Disciplines.

Authors:  Shannon K Brewer; Ryan A McManamay; Andrew D Miller; Robert Mollenhauer; Thomas A Worthington; Tom Arsuffi
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 3.266

3.  Identifying monitoring information needs that support the management of fish in large rivers.

Authors:  Timothy D Counihan; Kristen L Bouska; Shannon K Brewer; Robert B Jacobson; Andrew F Casper; Colin G Chapman; Ian R Waite; Kenneth R Sheehan; Mark Pyron; Elise R Irwin; Karen Riva-Murray; Alexa J McKerrow; Jennifer M Bayer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 3.752

4.  Spatial sampling bias and model complexity in stream-based species distribution models: A case study of Paddlefish (Polyodon spathula) in the Arkansas River basin, USA.

Authors:  Andrew T Taylor; Thomas Hafen; Colt T Holley; Alin González; James M Long
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2019-12-25       Impact factor: 2.912

5.  Interacting effects of discharge and channel morphology on transport of semibuoyant fish eggs in large, altered river systems.

Authors:  Thomas A Worthington; Shannon K Brewer; Nicole Farless; Timothy B Grabowski; Mark S Gregory
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.