Literature DB >> 23873593

Meta-analysis for diagnostic accuracy studies: a new statistical model using beta-binomial distributions and bivariate copulas.

Oliver Kuss1, Annika Hoyer, Alexander Solms.   

Abstract

There are still challenges when meta-analyzing data from studies on diagnostic accuracy. This is mainly due to the bivariate nature of the response where information on sensitivity and specificity must be summarized while accounting for their correlation within a single trial. In this paper, we propose a new statistical model for the meta-analysis for diagnostic accuracy studies. This model uses beta-binomial distributions for the marginal numbers of true positives and true negatives and links these margins by a bivariate copula distribution. The new model comes with all the features of the current standard model, a bivariate logistic regression model with random effects, but has the additional advantages of a closed likelihood function and a larger flexibility for the correlation structure of sensitivity and specificity. In a simulation study, which compares three copula models and two implementations of the standard model, the Plackett and the Gauss copula do rarely perform worse but frequently better than the standard model. We use an example from a meta-analysis to judge the diagnostic accuracy of telomerase (a urinary tumor marker) for the diagnosis of primary bladder cancer for illustration.
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  beta-binomial distribution; copula; meta-analysis; sensitivity; specificity

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23873593     DOI: 10.1002/sim.5909

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  10 in total

1.  Meta-analysis of studies with bivariate binary outcomes: a marginal beta-binomial model approach.

Authors:  Yong Chen; Chuan Hong; Yang Ning; Xiao Su
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2015-08-24       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  A simple and robust method for multivariate meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy.

Authors:  Yong Chen; Yulun Liu; Haitao Chu; Mei-Ling Ting Lee; Christopher H Schmid
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Bayesian mixed treatment comparisons meta-analysis for correlated outcomes subject to reporting bias.

Authors:  Yulun Liu; Stacia M DeSantis; Yong Chen
Journal:  J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat       Date:  2017-03-17       Impact factor: 1.864

4.  Meta-analysis of Proportions of Rare Events-A Comparison of Exact Likelihood Methods with Robust Variance Estimation.

Authors:  Yan Ma; Haitao Chu; Madhu Mazumdar
Journal:  Commun Stat Simul Comput       Date:  2014-09-11       Impact factor: 1.118

5.  An improved method for bivariate meta-analysis when within-study correlations are unknown.

Authors:  Chuan Hong; Richard D Riley; Yong Chen
Journal:  Res Synth Methods       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 5.273

6.  A Bayesian multivariate meta-analysis of prevalence data.

Authors:  Lianne Siegel; Kyle Rudser; Siobhan Sutcliffe; Alayne Markland; Linda Brubaker; Sheila Gahagan; Ann E Stapleton; Haitao Chu
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Multivariate meta-analysis using individual participant data.

Authors:  R D Riley; M J Price; D Jackson; M Wardle; F Gueyffier; J Wang; J A Staessen; I R White
Journal:  Res Synth Methods       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 5.273

8.  A double SIMEX approach for bivariate random-effects meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies.

Authors:  Annamaria Guolo
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 4.615

9.  Model-based methods for case definitions from administrative health data: application to rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Kristine Kroeker; Jessica Widdifield; Saman Muthukumarana; Depeng Jiang; Lisa M Lix
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 10.  When should meta-analysis avoid making hidden normality assumptions?

Authors:  Dan Jackson; Ian R White
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2018-07-30       Impact factor: 2.207

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.