Literature DB >> 23873347

High shear rheology and anisotropy in concentrated solutions of monoclonal antibodies.

Isidro E Zarraga1, Rosalynn Taing, Jonathan Zarzar, Jacob Luoma, Jenny Hsiung, Ankit Patel, Fredric J Lim.   

Abstract

The high shear rheology of three concentrated solutions of immunoglobulin G1 monoclonal antibodies (mAb1, mAb2, and mAb3), differing only in their complementarity determining regions, was characterized using rotary and capillary rheometry. The more viscous solutions (mAb1 and mAb3) showed non-Newtonian behavior at high shear rates exhibiting both shear thinning and appreciable normal stress differences (NSDs) in the shear rate range γ = 10 to 10(4) s(-1) . The rheograms were retraced after γ is increased and decreased, suggesting reversible self-associations under shear. In contrast, mAb2 solutions showed Newtonian behavior up to γ = 6 × 10(4) s(-1) . The critical shear stress τc , corresponding to the onset of the reduction in the viscosity η, is a measure of mAb equilibrium cluster strength and increased rapidly with concentration for the high viscosity mAb solutions above 100 mg/mL. In addition, decreasing the temperature from 20°C to 5°C increased η at low γ, but shear-thinning was enhanced and its onset occurred at a lower γc . Using an Arrhenius model η = A exp(Ea /kT), the activation energy for viscous flow Ea was found to decrease for mAb1 solutions as γ was increased from 10 to 10(4) s(-1) , suggesting mAb cluster disruption or rearrangement under shear. In contrast, for mAb2, this Ea remained constant in the γ range. Finally, mAb1 and mAb3 solutions showed appreciable NSDs, with their N1 > 0 scaling linearly with γ in the range 10(3) to 10(4) s(-1) , whereas their |N2 /N1 | was less than 0.25 in this region. These suggest anisotropy and deformation of their solution microstructure toward the extensional quadrant of the flow at high γ. In contrast, the NSDs for mAb2 were close to zero indicating that the solution microstructure under shear is practically isotropic.
Copyright © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anisotropy; antibody; cluster; colloid; concentrated solutions; formulation; injectables; proteins; relaxation time; viscosity

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23873347     DOI: 10.1002/jps.23647

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharm Sci        ISSN: 0022-3549            Impact factor:   3.534


  10 in total

1.  Viscosity Analysis of Dual Variable Domain Immunoglobulin Protein Solutions: Role of Size, Electroviscous Effect and Protein-Protein Interactions.

Authors:  Ashlesha S Raut; Devendra S Kalonia
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 4.200

2.  Rational design of viscosity reducing mutants of a monoclonal antibody: hydrophobic versus electrostatic inter-molecular interactions.

Authors:  Pilarin Nichols; Li Li; Sandeep Kumar; Patrick M Buck; Satish K Singh; Sumit Goswami; Bryan Balthazor; Tami R Conley; David Sek; Martin J Allen
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 5.857

3.  Contrasting the Influence of Cationic Amino Acids on the Viscosity and Stability of a Highly Concentrated Monoclonal Antibody.

Authors:  Barton J Dear; Jessica J Hung; Thomas M Truskett; Keith P Johnston
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 4.200

4.  Observation of small cluster formation in concentrated monoclonal antibody solutions and its implications to solution viscosity.

Authors:  Eric J Yearley; Paul D Godfrin; Tatiana Perevozchikova; Hailiang Zhang; Peter Falus; Lionel Porcar; Michihiro Nagao; Joseph E Curtis; Pradad Gawande; Rosalynn Taing; Isidro E Zarraga; Norman J Wagner; Yun Liu
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Cluster Formation and Entanglement in the Rheology of Antibody Solutions.

Authors:  Nelson Ramallo; Subhash Paudel; Jeremy Schmit
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2019-04-25       Impact factor: 2.991

6.  Protein intrinsic viscosity determination with the Viscosizer TD instrument: reaching beyond the initially expected applications.

Authors:  Sébastien Brûlé; Raffaele Leroux; Patrick England; Bertrand Raynal
Journal:  Eur Biophys J       Date:  2021-01-24       Impact factor: 1.733

7.  A Microfluidic Prototype for High-Frequency, Large Strain Oscillatory Flow Rheometry.

Authors:  Alfredo Lanzaro; Xue-Feng Yuan
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 2.891

Review 8.  Advancements in the co-formulation of biologic therapeutics.

Authors:  Veeren M Chauhan; Hongyu Zhang; Paul A Dalby; Jonathan W Aylott
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2020-08-14       Impact factor: 9.776

9.  A microfluidic approach to studying the injection flow of concentrated albumin solutions.

Authors:  Alfredo Lanzaro
Journal:  SN Appl Sci       Date:  2021-08-24

10.  Local retention of antibodies in vivo with an injectable film embedded with a fluorogen-activating protein.

Authors:  Wen Liu; Matthew J Saunders; Christina Bagia; Eric C Freeman; Yong Fan; Ellen S Gawalt; Alan S Waggoner; Wilson S Meng
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 9.776

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.