| Literature DB >> 23873295 |
Ewa Kurzeja1, Agnieszka Synowiec-Wojtarowicz, Małgorzata Stec, Marek Glinka, Stanisław Gawron, Katarzyna Pawłowska-Góral.
Abstract
The results of studies on the biological influence of magnetic fields are controversial and do not provide clear answers regarding their impact on cell functioning. Fluoride compounds are substances that influence free radical processes, which occur when the reactive forms of oxygen are present. It is not known whether static magnetic fields (SMF) cause any changes in fluoride assimilation or activity. Therefore, the aim of this work was to determine the potential relationship between magnetic field exposure to, and the antioxidant system of, fibroblasts cultured with fluoride ions. Three chambers with static magnetic fields of different intensities (0.4, 0.6, and 0.7 T) were used in this work. Fluoride ions were added at a concentration of 0.12 mM, which did not cause the precipitation of calcium or magnesium. The results of this study show that static magnetic fields reduce the oxidative stress caused by fluoride ions and normalize the activities of antioxidant enzymes, including superoxide dismutase (SOD), glutathione peroxidase (GPx), and catalase (CAT). Static magnetic fields modify the energy state of fibroblasts, causing an increase in the ATP concentration and a decrease in the MDA concentration. These results suggest that exposure to fluoride and an SMF improves the tolerance of cells to the oxidative stress induced by fluoride ions.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23873295 PMCID: PMC3742285 DOI: 10.3390/ijms140715017
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Effects of the static magnetic fields (SMF) and fluoride on antioxidative defense parameters in fibroblasts.
| SOD [U/106 cells] | GPx [U/106 cells] | CAT [nM/min/106 cells] | GST [nM/min/106 cells] | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 0.78 ± 0.024 | 627.6 ± 2.07 | 10.36 ± 0.86 | 68.73 ± 3.07 |
| SMF0 + F | 0.56 ± 0.018 | 503.6 ± 24.05 | 8.66 ± 0.89 | 70.15 ± 2.67 |
| SMF1 + F | 0.56 ± 0.024 | 541.7 ± 2.77 | 8.72 ± 0.87 | 74.78 ± 1.06 |
| SMF2 + F | 0.58 ± 0.013 | 615.4 ± 26.12 | 10.06 ± 0.59 | 76.54 ± 1.69 |
| SMF3 + F | 0.63 ± 0.010 | 695.2 ± 4.28 | 10.69 ± 0.85 | 83.16 ± 1.12 |
Results are presented as mean ± S.D. (n = 5);
p < 0.05 vs. Control;
p < 0.05 vs. SMF0 + F; Control, control culture without magnet (flux density 0T) and without fluoride ions; SMF0 + F, control culture with fluoride ions (0.12 mM) and without magnet (flux density 0 T); SMF1 + F, culture with fluoride ions (0.12 mM) and with magnet (flux density 0.4 T); SMF2 + F, culture with fluoride ions (0.12 mM) and with magnet (flux density 0.6 T); SMF3 + F, culture with fluoride ions (0.12 mM) and with magnet (flux density 0.7 T).
Figure 1Effects of the static magnetic fields (SMF) and fluoride on adenosine triphosphate (ATP) concentration in fibroblasts. Results are presented as mean ± S.D. (n = 5); ap < 0.05 vs. Control; bp < 0.05 vs. SMF0 + F. Experimental conditions as per that described in Table 1.
Figure 2Effects of the static magnetic fields (SMF) and fluoride on malondialdehyde (MDA) concentration in fibroblasts. Results are presented as mean ± S.D. (n = 5); ap < 0.05 vs. Control; bp < 0.05 vs. SMF0 + F. Experimental conditions as per that described in Table 1.
Figure 3Effects of the static magnetic fields (SMF) and fluoride on antioxidant status (ABTS) in fibroblasts. Results are presented as mean ± S.D. (n = 5); ap < 0.05 vs. Control; bp < 0.05 vs. SMF0 + F. Experimental conditions as per that described in Table 1.