Literature DB >> 23873234

United States hospital admissions for lumbar spinal stenosis: racial and ethnic differences, 2000 through 2009.

Richard L Skolasky1, Anica M Maggard, Roland J Thorpe, Stephen T Wegener, Lee H Riley.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of Nationwide Inpatient Sample and US Census data.
OBJECTIVE: To (1) document national trends in surgical hospitalizations with the primary diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis from 2000 through 2009; and (2) evaluate how those trends relate to race and ethnicity. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: In the United States, the rate of lumbar spinal stenosis surgery is increasing, and understanding how changing demographic trends impact hospitalization rates for this surgery is important.
METHODS: Multivariable regression models were used to determine associations between race and ethnicity and the rates of surgical hospitalization for lumbar spinal stenosis. All models were adjusted for age, sex, insurance, income status, geographical location, and comorbidities.
RESULTS: From 2000 through 2009, the overall surgical hospitalization rate increased by 30%. Surgical hospitalization rates for lumbar spinal stenosis in the United States varied substantially across racial and ethnic groups. In 2009, white, non-Hispanics had the highest rate (1.074 per 1000) compared with black, non-Hispanics (0.558 per 1000; P< 0.001), and Hispanics (0.339 per 1000; P< 0.001). The relative differences persisted across time.
CONCLUSION: There were substantial differences in rates of surgical hospitalization among individuals of different racial and ethnic groups. Possible causes were (1) differences in clinical decision making among spine care providers with regard to offering surgical care to minority populations; (2) differences in access to care because of financial, educational, or geographical barriers; and (3) differences in attitudes toward surgical care among those of different racial and ethnic groups. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23873234     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182a3d392

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  12 in total

1.  Editor's spotlight/take 5: longitudinal urban-rural discrepancies in the US orthopaedic surgeon workforce. Interview by Seth S. Leopold.

Authors:  Jonathan N Grauer; Michael C Fu
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-08-09       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  Exploring the expectation-actuality discrepancy: a systematic review of the impact of preoperative expectations on satisfaction and patient reported outcomes in spinal surgery.

Authors:  Christopher D Witiw; Alireza Mansouri; Francois Mathieu; Farshad Nassiri; Jetan H Badhiwala; Richard G Fessler
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 3.042

3.  Health behavior change counseling in surgery for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Part I: improvement in rehabilitation engagement and functional outcomes.

Authors:  Richard L Skolasky; Anica M Maggard; David Li; Lee H Riley; Stephen T Wegener
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2015-03-28       Impact factor: 3.966

4.  Evaluation of outcome measures for neurogenic claudication: A patient-centered approach.

Authors:  John D Markman; Jennifer S Gewandter; Maria E Frazer; Christine Pittman; Xueya Cai; Kushang V Patel; Babak S Jahromi; Robert H Dworkin; Laurie B Burke; John T Farrar
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 9.910

5.  Pediatric spondylolysis/spinal stenosis and disc herniation: national trends in decompression and discectomy surgery evaluated through the Kids' Inpatient Database.

Authors:  Tridu R Huynh; Carlito Lagman; Fadi Sweiss; Faris Shweikeh; Miriam Nuño; Doniel Drazin
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 1.475

6.  Outcomes Following Surgical Management of Cauda Equina Syndrome: Does Race Matter?

Authors:  Amit Jain; Emmanuel Menga; Addisu Mesfin
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2017-04-21

7.  National utilization and inpatient safety measures of lumbar spinal fusion methods by race/ethnicity.

Authors:  Angel M Reyes; Jeffrey N Katz; Andrew J Schoenfeld; James D Kang; Elena Losina; Yuchiao Chang
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2020-11-20       Impact factor: 4.166

8.  SpineCloud: image analytics for predictive modeling of spine surgery outcomes.

Authors:  Tharindu De Silva; S Swaroop Vedula; Alexander Perdomo-Pantoja; Rohan Vijayan; Sophia A Doerr; Ali Uneri; Runze Han; Michael D Ketcha; Richard L Skolasky; Timothy Witham; Nicholas Theodore; Jeffrey H Siewerdsen
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2020-02-18

Review 9.  Efficacy of epidural injections in the treatment of lumbar central spinal stenosis: a systematic review.

Authors:  Laxmaiah Manchikanti; Alan David Kaye; Kavita Manchikanti; Mark Boswell; Vidyasagar Pampati; Joshua Hirsch
Journal:  Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2015-02-01

10.  Superion(®) InterSpinous Spacer for treatment of moderate degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: durable three-year results of a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Vikas V Patel; Pierce D Nunley; Peter G Whang; Thomas R Haley; W Daniel Bradley; Raphael P Davis; Jon E Block; Fred H Geisler
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2015-10-03       Impact factor: 3.133

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.