Literature DB >> 23872805

Complications and outcomes of diaphyseal forearm fracture intramedullary nailing: a comparison of pediatric and adolescent age groups.

Jeffrey E Martus1, Ryan K Preston, Jonathan G Schoenecker, Steven A Lovejoy, Neil E Green, Gregory A Mencio.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Flexible intramedullary nailing (IMN) has become a popular technique for the management of unstable or open forearm fractures. Recent publications have suggested an increased incidence of delayed union and poor outcomes in older children and adolescents. The objective of this study was to review forearm fractures treated with IMN, comparing the rate of complications and outcomes between the 2 age groups. Our hypothesis was that IMN is an effective technique with a similar rate of complications in both age groups.
METHODS: An Institutional Review Board-approved retrospective review was conducted of pediatric forearm fractures treated from 1998 to 2008 at a single institution. Over the study time period, 4161 pediatric forearm fractures were managed nonoperatively (92%) and 353 were treated operatively with plate, cross-pin, or intramedullary fixation (8%). Patients with inadequate follow-up, cross-pin, or plate fixation were excluded. Medical records were reviewed for indications and complications. Complications were graded with a modification of the Clavien-Dindo classification. Outcomes were judged by a new grading system.
RESULTS: A total of 205 forearm fractures treated with IMN in 203 patients were identified. The mean age was 9.7 years (range, 1.7 to 16.2 y) and mean follow-up was 42 weeks. Operative indications were failure of closed treatment in 165 (80%) and open fracture in 40 (20%). Mean time from injury to IMN was 5.9 days (range, 0 to 25 d). Single bone IMN was performed in 40 of 185 both bone fractures (26%); there were 20 single-bone forearm fractures treated with IMN. Open reduction was required in 61/165 (37%) of closed fractures. Asymptomatic delayed union (grade 1 complication) was observed in 9 fractures (4%). More severe complications were noted in 17% (grade 2 to 4 complications). Postoperative compartment syndrome occurred in 3 isolated forearm fractures with a significant younger mean age (6.0 vs. 10 y, P=0.031). Overall, complications were significantly more frequent in children older than 10 years of age (25/101) as compared with younger children (13/104, P=0.031). In particular, delayed union was more common in children over the age of 10 years (9/101 vs. 1/104, OR=9.99, P=0.009). Outcomes were good or excellent in 91% of fractures. There was no statistical association of patient age with a fair or poor outcome.
CONCLUSIONS: IMN is an effective technique for pediatric forearm fractures with good to excellent outcomes in 91%. Complications are not infrequent with this technique, with complications of grade 2 to 4 severity in 17%. There was a 2-fold increase in the rate of complications in children over the age of 10 years. Compartment syndrome was more common in younger children. Patients and families should be counseled about the risks preoperatively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23872805     DOI: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e3182a11d3b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop        ISSN: 0271-6798            Impact factor:   2.324


  21 in total

1.  Reply to Letter to Editor Regarding the Article: Intramedullary Flexible Nailing for the Diaphyseal Fractures of Forearm Bones in Children.

Authors:  Balakrishnan M Acharya; Pramod Devkota; Abhishek K Thakur; Bidur Gyawali
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2020-05-29

Review 2.  Forearm diaphyseal fractures in the adolescent population: treatment and management.

Authors:  Jeremy Truntzer; Matthew L Vopat; Patrick M Kane; Melissa A Christino; Julia Katarincic; Bryan G Vopat
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2014-06-06

3.  Severe Neurovascular Compromise Associated with Plastic Deformation of Ulna Elastic Nail Following Forearm Re-fracture.

Authors:  Zakk M Borton; Simon Weil; Edward F Ibrahim; Callum Clark
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2019-03-28

4.  Etiology of trauma-related acute compartment syndrome of the forearm: a systematic review.

Authors:  Khalid I Khoshhal; Ehab F Alsaygh; Obaid F Alsaedi; Alwaleed A Alshahir; Ammar F Alzahim; Mohammad S Al Fehaid
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 2.677

5.  Clinical and financial impacts of flexible intramedullary nailing in pediatric diaphyseal forearm fractures: A case-control study.

Authors:  Aline Leuba; Dimitri Ceroni; Anne Tabard-Fougère; Nicolas Lutz
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 1.917

6.  Risk factors for re-fracture in children with diaphyseal fracture of the forearm treated with elastic stable intramedullary nailing.

Authors:  Marie Rousset; Mounira Mansour; Antoine Samba; Bruno Pereira; Federico Canavese
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2015-10-31

7.  Hybrid fixation for adolescent both-bones diaphyseal forearm fractures: Preliminary results of a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Ahmed S Elhalawany; Ahmed Afifi; Ashraf Anbar; Sherif Galal
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2019-05-09

8.  Elastic Intramedullary Nailing of Pediatric Both-Bone Forearm Fractures.

Authors:  Vidyadhar V Upasani; Ying Li
Journal:  JBJS Essent Surg Tech       Date:  2020-12-24

Review 9.  Treatment of diaphyseal forearm fractures in children.

Authors:  Matthew L Vopat; Patrick M Kane; Melissa A Christino; Jeremy Truntzer; Philip McClure; Julia Katarincic; Bryan G Vopat
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2014-06-24

10.  Rupture of the extensor pollicis longus tendon following dorsal entry flexible nailing of radial shaft fractures in children.

Authors:  Ben Brooker; P Christian Harris; Leo T Donnan; H Kerr Graham
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 1.548

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.