BACKGROUND: Abnormal atrial repolarization is important in the development of atrial fibrillation (AF), but no direct measurement is available in clinical medicine. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the QT interval, a marker of ventricular repolarization, could be used to predict incident AF. METHODS: We examined a prolonged QT interval corrected by using the Framingham formula (QT(Fram)) as a predictor of incident AF in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study. The Cardiovascular Health Study (CHS) and Health, Aging, and Body Composition (ABC) study were used for validation. Secondary predictors included QT duration as a continuous variable, a short QT interval, and QT intervals corrected by using other formulas. RESULTS: Among 14,538 ARIC study participants, a prolonged QT(Fram) predicted a roughly 2-fold increased risk of AF (hazard ratio [HR] 2.05; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.42-2.96; P < .001). No substantive attenuation was observed after adjustment for age, race, sex, study center, body mass index, hypertension, diabetes, coronary disease, and heart failure. The findings were validated in Cardiovascular Health Study and Health, Aging, and Body Composition study and were similar across various QT correction methods. Also in the ARIC study, each 10-ms increase in QT(Fram) was associated with an increased unadjusted (HR 1.14; 95% CI 1.10-1.17; P < .001) and adjusted (HR 1.11; 95% CI 1.07-1.14; P < .001) risk of AF. Findings regarding a short QT interval were inconsistent across cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: A prolonged QT interval is associated with an increased risk of incident AF.
BACKGROUND: Abnormal atrial repolarization is important in the development of atrial fibrillation (AF), but no direct measurement is available in clinical medicine. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the QT interval, a marker of ventricular repolarization, could be used to predict incident AF. METHODS: We examined a prolonged QT interval corrected by using the Framingham formula (QT(Fram)) as a predictor of incident AF in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study. The Cardiovascular Health Study (CHS) and Health, Aging, and Body Composition (ABC) study were used for validation. Secondary predictors included QT duration as a continuous variable, a short QT interval, and QT intervals corrected by using other formulas. RESULTS: Among 14,538 ARIC study participants, a prolonged QT(Fram) predicted a roughly 2-fold increased risk of AF (hazard ratio [HR] 2.05; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.42-2.96; P < .001). No substantive attenuation was observed after adjustment for age, race, sex, study center, body mass index, hypertension, diabetes, coronary disease, and heart failure. The findings were validated in Cardiovascular Health Study and Health, Aging, and Body Composition study and were similar across various QT correction methods. Also in the ARIC study, each 10-ms increase in QT(Fram) was associated with an increased unadjusted (HR 1.14; 95% CI 1.10-1.17; P < .001) and adjusted (HR 1.11; 95% CI 1.07-1.14; P < .001) risk of AF. Findings regarding a short QT interval were inconsistent across cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: A prolonged QT interval is associated with an increased risk of incident AF.
Authors: A C Zygmunt; G T Eddlestone; G P Thomas; V V Nesterenko; C Antzelevitch Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2001-08 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: Reto Auer; Douglas C Bauer; Pedro Marques-Vidal; Javed Butler; Lauren J Min; Jacques Cornuz; Suzanne Satterfield; Anne B Newman; Eric Vittinghoff; Nicolas Rodondi Journal: JAMA Date: 2012-04-11 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Elsayed Z Soliman; George Howard; Mary Cushman; Brett Kissela; Dawn Kleindorfer; Anh Le; Suzanne Judd; Leslie A McClure; Virginia J Howard Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2012-04-17 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Jonas Bille Nielsen; Claus Graff; Adrian Pietersen; Bent Lind; Johannes Jan Struijk; Morten Salling Olesen; Stig Haunsø; Thomas Alexander Gerds; Jesper Hastrup Svendsen; Lars Køber; Anders Gaarsdal Holst Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2013-04-12 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: John S Lowe; Dina Myers Stroud; Tao Yang; Lynn Hall; Thomas C Atack; Dan M Roden Journal: Cardiovasc Res Date: 2012-05-04 Impact factor: 10.787
Authors: Paulus Kirchhof; Lars Eckardt; Michael R Franz; Gerold Mönnig; Peter Loh; Horst Wedekind; Eric Schulze-Bahr; Günther Breithardt; Wilhelm Haverkamp Journal: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol Date: 2003-10
Authors: Kaylin T Nguyen; Rachel A Gladstone; Jonathan W Dukes; Babak Nazer; Eric Vittinghoff; Nitish Badhwar; Vasanth Vedantham; Edward P Gerstenfeld; Byron K Lee; Randall J Lee; Zian H Tseng; Jeffrey E Olgin; Melvin M Scheinman; Gregory M Marcus Journal: Pacing Clin Electrophysiol Date: 2016-11-10 Impact factor: 1.976
Authors: Nikhil Patel; Wesley T O'Neal; S Patrick Whalen; Elsayed Z Soliman Journal: Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol Date: 2017-06-29 Impact factor: 1.468
Authors: Wesley T O'Neal; Virginia J Howard; Dawn Kleindorfer; Brett Kissela; Suzanne E Judd; Leslie A McClure; Mary Cushman; George Howard; Elsayed Z Soliman Journal: Europace Date: 2015-10-20 Impact factor: 5.214
Authors: Wesley T O'Neal; Jimmy T Efird; Hooman Kamel; Saman Nazarian; Alvaro Alonso; Susan R Heckbert; W T Longstreth; Elsayed Z Soliman Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2015-03-10 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: Kaylin T Nguyen; Eric Vittinghoff; Thomas A Dewland; Mala C Mandyam; Phyllis K Stein; Elsayed Z Soliman; Susan R Heckbert; Gregory M Marcus Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2016-06-14 Impact factor: 2.778