Literature DB >> 23872557

Transcriptome-based characterization of interactions between Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus in lactose-grown chemostat cocultures.

Filipa Mendes1, Sander Sieuwerts, Erik de Hulster, Marinka J H Almering, Marijke A H Luttik, Jack T Pronk, Eddy J Smid, Peter A Bron, Pascale Daran-Lapujade.   

Abstract

Mixed populations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeasts and lactic acid bacteria occur in many dairy, food, and beverage fermentations, but knowledge about their interactions is incomplete. In the present study, interactions between Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus, two microorganisms that co-occur in kefir fermentations, were studied during anaerobic growth on lactose. By combining physiological and transcriptome analysis of the two strains in the cocultures, five mechanisms of interaction were identified. (i) Lb. delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus hydrolyzes lactose, which cannot be metabolized by S. cerevisiae, to galactose and glucose. Subsequently, galactose, which cannot be metabolized by Lb. delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus, is excreted and provides a carbon source for yeast. (ii) In pure cultures, Lb. delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus grows only in the presence of increased CO2 concentrations. In anaerobic mixed cultures, the yeast provides this CO2 via alcoholic fermentation. (iii) Analysis of amino acid consumption from the defined medium indicated that S. cerevisiae supplied alanine to the bacterium. (iv) A mild but significant low-iron response in the yeast transcriptome, identified by DNA microarray analysis, was consistent with the chelation of iron by the lactate produced by Lb. delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus. (v) Transcriptome analysis of Lb. delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus in mixed cultures showed an overrepresentation of transcripts involved in lipid metabolism, suggesting either a competition of the two microorganisms for fatty acids or a response to the ethanol produced by S. cerevisiae. This study demonstrates that chemostat-based transcriptome analysis is a powerful tool to investigate microbial interactions in mixed populations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23872557      PMCID: PMC3811385          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.01115-13

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  60 in total

1.  Getting started with yeast.

Authors:  F Sherman
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.600

2.  Enhanced kefiran production by mixed culture of Lactobacillus kefiranofaciens and Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Benjamas Cheirsilp; Hiroshi Shimizu; Suteaki Shioya
Journal:  J Biotechnol       Date:  2003-01-09       Impact factor: 3.307

3.  Proteome analysis of recombinant xylose-fermenting Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Laura Salusjärvi; Marjo Poutanen; Juha-Pekka Pitkänen; Heini Koivistoinen; Aristos Aristidou; Nisse Kalkkinen; Laura Ruohonen; Merja Penttilä
Journal:  Yeast       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.239

Review 4.  Microbial ecology and activities in the rumen: part 1.

Authors:  P N Hobson; R J Wallace
Journal:  Crit Rev Microbiol       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 7.624

5.  Kefir: a symbiotic yeasts-bacteria community with alleged healthy capabilities.

Authors:  Fernando Lopitz-Otsoa; Aitor Rementeria; Natalia Elguezabal; Javier Garaizar
Journal:  Rev Iberoam Micol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.044

6.  Lactic acid bacteria and yeasts in kefir grains and kefir made from them.

Authors:  E Simova; D Beshkova; A Angelov; Ts Hristozova; G Frengova; Z Spasov
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.346

7.  Isolation of bacteria whose growth is dependent on high levels of CO2 and implications of their potential diversity.

Authors:  Kenji Ueda; Yudai Tagami; Yuka Kamihara; Hatsumi Shiratori; Hideaki Takano; Teruhiko Beppu
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2008-05-16       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Physiological and transcriptional responses of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to zinc limitation in chemostat cultures.

Authors:  Raffaele De Nicola; Lucie A Hazelwood; Erik A F De Hulster; Michael C Walsh; Theo A Knijnenburg; Marcel J T Reinders; Graeme M Walker; Jack T Pronk; Jean-Marc Daran; Pascale Daran-Lapujade
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2007-10-12       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Microbial dynamics and biodiversity in table olive fermentation: culture-dependent and -independent approaches.

Authors:  Cristian Botta; Luca Cocolin
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 5.640

10.  Exploiting combinatorial cultivation conditions to infer transcriptional regulation.

Authors:  Theo A Knijnenburg; Johannes H de Winde; Jean-Marc Daran; Pascale Daran-Lapujade; Jack T Pronk; Marcel J T Reinders; Lodewyk F A Wessels
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2007-01-22       Impact factor: 3.969

View more
  22 in total

1.  Food Spoilage-Associated Leuconostoc, Lactococcus, and Lactobacillus Species Display Different Survival Strategies in Response to Competition.

Authors:  Margarita Andreevskaya; Elina Jääskeläinen; Per Johansson; Anne Ylinen; Lars Paulin; Johanna Björkroth; Petri Auvinen
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  The production and biochemical characterization of α-carbonic anhydrase from Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG.

Authors:  Linda J Urbański; Silvia Bua; Andrea Angeli; Reza Zolfaghari Emameh; Harlan R Barker; Marianne Kuuslahti; Vesa P Hytönen; Seppo Parkkila; Claudiu T Supuran
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2022-05-25       Impact factor: 5.560

3.  Physiological and transcriptional responses of anaerobic chemostat cultures of Saccharomyces cerevisiae subjected to diurnal temperature cycles.

Authors:  Marit Hebly; Dick de Ridder; Erik A F de Hulster; Pilar de la Torre Cortes; Jack T Pronk; Pascale Daran-Lapujade
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Transcriptomic Responses of the Interactions between Clostridium cellulovorans 743B and Rhodopseudomonas palustris CGA009 in a Cellulose-Grown Coculture for Enhanced Hydrogen Production.

Authors:  Hongyuan Lu; Jiahua Chen; Yangyang Jia; Mingwei Cai; Patrick K H Lee
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2016-07-15       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Synergistic Effect in Core Microbiota Associated with Sulfur Metabolism in Spontaneous Chinese Liquor Fermentation.

Authors:  Jun Liu; Qun Wu; Peng Wang; Jianchun Lin; Ling Huang; Yan Xu
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Genomic expression program of Saccharomyces cerevisiae along a mixed-culture wine fermentation with Hanseniaspora guilliermondii.

Authors:  Catarina Barbosa; Arlete Mendes-Faia; Patrícia Lage; Nuno P Mira; Ana Mendes-Ferreira
Journal:  Microb Cell Fact       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 5.328

Review 7.  Fluorescence-based bioassays for the detection and evaluation of food materials.

Authors:  Kentaro Nishi; Shin-Ichiro Isobe; Yun Zhu; Ryoiti Kiyama
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2015-10-13       Impact factor: 3.576

8.  Growth-rate dependency of de novo resveratrol production in chemostat cultures of an engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain.

Authors:  Tim Vos; Pilar de la Torre Cortés; Walter M van Gulik; Jack T Pronk; Pascale Daran-Lapujade
Journal:  Microb Cell Fact       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 5.328

9.  Functional characterization of a Penicillium chrysogenum mutanase gene induced upon co-cultivation with Bacillus subtilis.

Authors:  Ishwar Bajaj; Tânia Veiga; Dino van Dissel; Jack T Pronk; Jean-Marc Daran
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 3.605

10.  Fine structure of Tibetan kefir grains and their yeast distribution, diversity, and shift.

Authors:  Man Lu; Xingxing Wang; Guowei Sun; Bing Qin; Jinzhou Xiao; Shuling Yan; Yingjie Pan; Yongjie Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.