Literature DB >> 23872495

A low-frequency oscillatory neural signal in humans encodes a developing decision variable.

Jan Kubanek1, Lawrence H Snyder, Bingni W Brunton, Carlos D Brody, Gerwin Schalk.   

Abstract

We often make decisions based on sensory evidence that is accumulated over a period of time. How the evidence for such decisions is represented in the brain and how such a neural representation is used to guide a subsequent action are questions of considerable interest to decision sciences. The neural correlates of developing perceptual decisions have been thoroughly investigated in the oculomotor system of macaques who communicated their decisions using an eye movement. It has been found that the evidence informing a decision to make an eye movement is in part accumulated within the same oculomotor circuits that signal the upcoming eye movement. Recent evidence suggests that the somatomotor system may exhibit an analogous property for choices made using a hand movement. To investigate this possibility, we engaged humans in a decision task in which they integrated discrete quanta of sensory information over a period of time and signaled their decision using a hand movement or an eye movement. The discrete form of the sensory evidence allowed us to infer the decision variable on which subjects base their decision on each trial and to assess the neural processes related to each quantum of the incoming decision evidence. We found that a low-frequency electrophysiological signal recorded over centroparietal regions strongly encodes the decision variable inferred in this task, and that it does so specifically for hand movement choices. The signal ramps up with a rate that is proportional to the decision variable, remains graded by the decision variable throughout the delay period, reaches a common peak shortly before a hand movement, and falls off shortly after the hand movement. Furthermore, the signal encodes the polarity of each evidence quantum, with a short latency, and retains the response level over time. Thus, this neural signal shows properties of evidence accumulation. These findings suggest that the decision-related effects observed in the oculomotor system of the monkey during eye movement choices may share the same basic properties with the decision-related effects in the somatomotor system of humans during hand movement choices.
© 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23872495      PMCID: PMC3815962          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.06.085

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  48 in total

Review 1.  Event-related EEG/MEG synchronization and desynchronization: basic principles.

Authors:  G Pfurtscheller; F H Lopes da Silva
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 3.708

2.  Separate signals for target selection and movement specification in the superior colliculus.

Authors:  G D Horwitz; W T Newsome
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-05-14       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Evidence for a decision variable in the human motor system.

Authors:  Jan Kubanek; David M Kaplan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 4.  Neural mechanisms underlying brain waves: from neural membranes to networks.

Authors:  F Lopes da Silva
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1991-08

Review 5.  The diffusion decision model: theory and data for two-choice decision tasks.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Gail McKoon
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.026

6.  Representation of the visual field in the lateral intraparietal area of macaque monkeys: a quantitative receptive field analysis.

Authors:  S Ben Hamed; J R Duhamel; F Bremmer; W Graf
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Functional mapping of human sensorimotor cortex with electrocorticographic spectral analysis. I. Alpha and beta event-related desynchronization.

Authors:  N E Crone; D L Miglioretti; B Gordon; J M Sieracki; M T Wilson; S Uematsu; R P Lesser
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 13.501

8.  Rats and humans can optimally accumulate evidence for decision-making.

Authors:  Bingni W Brunton; Matthew M Botvinick; Carlos D Brody
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-04-05       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Dorsal premotor cortex exerts state-dependent causal influences on activity in contralateral primary motor and dorsal premotor cortex.

Authors:  Sven Bestmann; Orlando Swayne; Felix Blankenburg; Christian C Ruff; Patrick Haggard; Nikolaus Weiskopf; Oliver Josephs; Jon Driver; John C Rothwell; Nick S Ward
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2007-10-26       Impact factor: 5.357

10.  Microstimulation of macaque area LIP affects decision-making in a motion discrimination task.

Authors:  Timothy D Hanks; Jochen Ditterich; Michael N Shadlen
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2006-04-09       Impact factor: 24.884

View more
  9 in total

1.  State-dependent architecture of thalamic reticular subnetworks.

Authors:  Michael M Halassa; Zhe Chen; Ralf D Wimmer; Philip M Brunetti; Shengli Zhao; Basilis Zikopoulos; Fan Wang; Emery N Brown; Matthew A Wilson
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  Reward and punishment act as distinct factors in guiding behavior.

Authors:  Jan Kubanek; Lawrence H Snyder; Richard A Abrams
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2015-03-28

3.  Instantaneous voltage as an alternative to power- and phase-based interpretation of oscillatory brain activity.

Authors:  Gerwin Schalk; Joshua Marple; Robert T Knight; William G Coon
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Beta oscillations reflect supramodal information during perceptual judgment.

Authors:  Saskia Haegens; José Vergara; Román Rossi-Pool; Luis Lemus; Ranulfo Romo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-12-11       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Within-subject reaction time variability: Role of cortical networks and underlying neurophysiological mechanisms.

Authors:  Sivylla E Paraskevopoulou; William G Coon; Peter Brunner; Kai J Miller; Gerwin Schalk
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  A general framework for dynamic cortical function: the function-through-biased-oscillations (FBO) hypothesis.

Authors:  Gerwin Schalk
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 7.  Beyond the Status Quo: A Role for Beta Oscillations in Endogenous Content (Re)Activation.

Authors:  Bernhard Spitzer; Saskia Haegens
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2017-08-02

8.  Cortical alpha activity predicts the confidence in an impending action.

Authors:  Jan Kubanek; N Jeremy Hill; Lawrence H Snyder; Gerwin Schalk
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 4.677

9.  Cortical Components of Reaction-Time during Perceptual Decisions in Humans.

Authors:  Jacek P Dmochowski; Anthony M Norcia
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.