Literature DB >> 23872122

Part I: The application of the h-index to groups of individuals and departments in academic neurosurgery.

Nickalus Khan1, Clinton J Thompson, Asim F Choudhri, Frederick A Boop, Paul Klimo.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The h-index was introduced as a means of quantifying the contribution a researcher makes to the scientific literature. We evaluated the h-index for academic neurosurgeons to assess the various methods of calculation and to determine whether the h-index can be used to differentiate groups of individuals by various classifications.
METHODS: The h-index was calculated for all neurosurgeons from 10 institutions ranked highly by 2012 U.S. News & World Report plus the authors' institution via Scopus. The h-index also was calculated manually to evaluate its accuracy. The average h-index was calculated for groups on the basis of sex, academic rank, years in practice, institution, and subspecialty. Cumulative and mean h-indices were calculated for each department.
RESULTS: The median h-index for the 188 neurosurgeons was 16 (mean, 19.71; range, 0-61). There was a positive association between the h-index, academic rank, and years posttraining. There was a significant difference between the "manually calculated" and automated h-indices, particularly for more senior physicians. The difference in h-index between men and women was not statistically significant. Among subspecialties, vascular surgeons had the greatest average h-index and general neurosurgeons had the lowest. There were significant shifts in departmental rankings when the cumulative or mean departmental indices were compared with the U.S. News & World Report rankings.
CONCLUSION: Application of the h-index as a bibliometric in neurosurgery can distinguish academic productivity on the basis of academic rank, years posttraining, and neurosurgical subspecialties. The application of the h-index to compare departments is problematic and, at this time, not reliable.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ANOVA; Academic neurosurgery; Analysis of variance; Bibliometrics; Citations; Department; Impact; Individual; Subspecialty; h-index

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23872122     DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2013.07.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World Neurosurg        ISSN: 1878-8750            Impact factor:   2.104


  8 in total

1.  Bibliometric Analyses of Physical and Occupational Therapy Faculty across Canada Indicate Productivity and Impact of Rehabilitation Research.

Authors:  Joy C MacDermid; Eunice H Fung; Mary Law
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 1.037

2.  Participation of the hospitals in the Republic of Ireland in international research over more than a decade: a bibliometric analysis.

Authors:  Ahmed Abdelaal Ahmed Mahmoud; Mohamed I Younis; Christopher Holmes; Amr Sallam; Mohamed Gomaa Kamel; Eugene Dempsey; Orla Mulhern
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 1.568

3.  An application of Bradford's law: identification of the core journals of pediatric neurosurgery and a regional comparison of citation density.

Authors:  Garrett T Venable; Brandon A Shepherd; Mallory L Roberts; Douglas R Taylor; Nickalus R Khan; Paul Klimo
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 1.475

4.  Academic productivity in surgical oncology: Where is the bar set for those training the next generation?

Authors:  Christopher J LaRocca; Paul Wong; Oliver S Eng; Mustafa Raoof; Susanne G Warner; Laleh G Melstrom
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-08-19       Impact factor: 3.454

5.  Surgical research in Colombia part 1: Scientific and academic productivity of the Colombian research groups in surgery.

Authors:  Ivan David Lozada-Martinez; Jeremías Carvajal-Bautista; Yelson Alejandro Picón-Jaimes; Gonzalo Dominguez-Alvarado; Luis Felipe Cabrera-Vargas; Lilian Torregrosa-Almonacid; Oscar Guevara-Cruz; Alexis Rafael Narvaez-Rojas
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2022-04-28

6.  An Assessment of the Academic Impact of Shock Society Members.

Authors:  Daniel P Milgrom; Leonidas G Koniaris; Nakul P Valsangkar; Neha Lad; Teresa M Bell; Brandon Wojcik; Teresa A Zimmers
Journal:  Shock       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 3.454

7.  Survey of h-index for neurosurgeons in Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Abdulhakim B Jamjoom
Journal:  Neurosciences (Riyadh)       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 0.906

8.  c-index and Subindices of the h-index: New Variants of the h-index to Account for Variations in Author Contribution.

Authors:  Alex Post; Adam Y Li; Jennifer B Dai; Akbar Y Maniya; Syed Haider; Stanislaw Sobotka; Tanvir F Choudhri
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2018-05-15
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.