BACKGROUND: The self-presentation of suicidal acts in social media has become a public health concern. AIMS: This article centers on a Chinese microblogger who posted a wrist-cutting picture that was widely circulated in Chinese social media in 2011. This exploratory study examines written reactions of a group of Chinese microbloggers exposed to the post containing a self-harming message and photo. In addition, we investigate the pattern of information diffusion via a social network. METHODS: We systematically collected and analyzed 5,971 generated microblogs and the network of information diffusion. RESULTS: We found that a significant portion of written responses (36.6%) could help vulnerable netizens by providing peer-support and calls for help. These responses were reposted and diffused via an online social network with markedly more clusters of users--and at a faster pace-- than a set of randomly generated networks. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that social media can be a double-edged sword: While it may contagiously affect others by spreading suicidal thoughts and acts, it may also play a positive role by assisting people at risk for suicide, providing rescue or support. More research is needed to learn how suicidally vulnerable people interact with online suicide information, and how we can effectively intervene.
BACKGROUND: The self-presentation of suicidal acts in social media has become a public health concern. AIMS: This article centers on a Chinese microblogger who posted a wrist-cutting picture that was widely circulated in Chinese social media in 2011. This exploratory study examines written reactions of a group of Chinese microbloggers exposed to the post containing a self-harming message and photo. In addition, we investigate the pattern of information diffusion via a social network. METHODS: We systematically collected and analyzed 5,971 generated microblogs and the network of information diffusion. RESULTS: We found that a significant portion of written responses (36.6%) could help vulnerable netizens by providing peer-support and calls for help. These responses were reposted and diffused via an online social network with markedly more clusters of users--and at a faster pace-- than a set of randomly generated networks. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that social media can be a double-edged sword: While it may contagiously affect others by spreading suicidal thoughts and acts, it may also play a positive role by assisting people at risk for suicide, providing rescue or support. More research is needed to learn how suicidally vulnerable people interact with online suicide information, and how we can effectively intervene.
Entities:
Keywords:
China; attempted suicide; microblog; social media; social network analysis
Authors: Thomas Niederkrotenthaler; King-wa Fu; Paul S F Yip; Daniel Y T Fong; Steven Stack; Qijin Cheng; Jane Pirkis Journal: J Epidemiol Community Health Date: 2012-04-21 Impact factor: 3.710
Authors: Vincent M B Silenzio; Paul R Duberstein; Wan Tang; Naiji Lu; Xin Tu; Christopher M Homan Journal: Soc Sci Med Date: 2009-06-18 Impact factor: 4.634
Authors: Paul Wai-Ching Wong; King-Wa Fu; Rickey Sai-Pong Yau; Helen Hei-Man Ma; Yik-Wa Law; Shu-Sen Chang; Paul Siu-Fai Yip Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2013-01-11 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Isaac Chun-Hai Fung; Jingxian Cai; Yi Hao; Yuchen Ying; Benedict Shing Bun Chan; Zion Tsz Ho Tse; King-Wa Fu Journal: Western Pac Surveill Response J Date: 2015-07-09
Authors: Daniel M Low; Kelly L Zuromski; Daniel Kessler; Satrajit S Ghosh; Matthew Nock; Walter Dempsey Journal: Proc Conf Empir Methods Nat Lang Process Date: 2021-11
Authors: Isaac Chun-Hai Fung; Yi Hao; Jingxian Cai; Yuchen Ying; Braydon James Schaible; Cynthia Mengxi Yu; Zion Tsz Ho Tse; King-Wa Fu Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-05-06 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Qijin Cheng; Chi Leung Kwok; Tingshao Zhu; Li Guan; Paul S F Yip Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2015-09-11 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Ying-Yeh Chen; Paul Sf Yip; Carmen Km Lee; David Gunnell; Kevin Chien-Chang Wu Journal: Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol Date: 2014-06-10 Impact factor: 4.328